Numerical optimization techniques

Optimization is a complex and sometimes difficult topic. Many books and countless research papers have been written about it. This appendix section discusses parameter optimization. There is a function, F(p, p2.), called the objective function that depends on the parameters p, p2, The goal is to determine the best values for the parameters, best in the sense that these parameter 

Numerical optimization techniques find local optima. They will find the top of a hill or the bottom of a valley. In constrained optimizations, they may take you to 

The random search technique can be applied to constrained or unconstrained optimization problems involving any number of parameters. 

Start with a feasible set of values for the optimization variables. 

Apply a random change to each of the optimization variables. Note Change all the variables at once. 

---

Here equation (7.61) is used without modification and the air feed temperature Yre> is used as the manipulated variable to obtain the maximum gasoline yield. The term Yhd on the left-hand side of (7.61) can be moved so that the chosen variable Yrd appears only on the nonlinear right-hand side of equation (7.61), while the left-hand side of the equation (7.61) still contains YAf. This manipulation allows us to solve the equation without having to use numerical optimization techniques. 

Similarly to the parameter fitting to edl, in the case of the specific adsorption, the numerical optimization techniques allow to fit model calculations with sufficient number of parameters. The decision of the conformity of the description must be evidenced by the structure of the created compound. 

The methodologies used for fitting calibration curves depend on whether they are linear or nonlinear. Model fitting basically consists of finding values of the model parameters that minimize the deviation between the fitted curve and the observed data (i.e., to get the curve to fit the data as perfectly as possible). For linear models, estimates of the parameters such as the intercept and slope can be derived analytically. However, this is not possible for most nonlinear models. Estimation of the parameters in most nonlinear models requires computer-intensive numerical optimization techniques that require the input of starting values by the user (or by an automated program), and the final estimates of the model parameters are determined based on numerically optimizing the closeness of the fitted calibration curve to the observed measurements. Fortunately, this is now automated and available in most user-friendly software. 

The most advanced material model presently available for UHMWPE is the HM. This model focuses on creating a mathematical representation of the deformation resistance and flow characteristics for conventional and highly crosslinked UHMWPE at the molecular level. The physics of the deformation mechanisms establish the framework and equations necessary to model the behavior on the macroscale. As already mentioned, to use the constitutive model for a given material requires a calibration step where material-specific parameters are determined. A variety of numerical methods may be used to determine the material-specific parameters for a constitutive theory. In the previous section we employed a numerical optimization technique to identify the material parameters for the constitutive theory. 

The idea of RSM began in the early 1930s but was finally well established in 1951 by the work of Box and Wilson [38], RSM is defined as a collection of statistical design and numerical optimization techniques for empirical model building and model exploitation used to optimize processes and product design [39,40], For example, a chemical engineer wishes to find the levels of temperature (xi) and pressure (X2) that maximize the yield (T) of a process. The process yield is a function of the levels of temperature and pressure ... 

Figure 5.1 illustrates schematically the iterative procedure employed in a numerical optimization technique. As seen in the fignre, the optimizer invokes the model with a set of values of decision variables x. The model simulates the phenomena and calculates the objective function and constraints. This information is utilized by the optimizer to calculate a new set of decision variables. This iterative sequence is continued until the optimization criteria pertaining to the optimization algorithm are satisfied. 

Other examples of joint-end modifications for joint transverse stress reduction but using external tapers are those of Sancaktar and Nirantar (2003) and Kaye and Heller (2005). Kaye and Heller (2005) used numerical optimization techniques in order to optimize the shape of the adherends. This is especially relevant in the context of repairs using composite patches bonded to aluminum structures (see Sect. 27.5) due to the highly stressed edges. 

Vanderplaats, G. N., Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1984. 

This task may be performed using a number of numerical optimization techniques. Here (/) ( "o) simply computed and plotted over a range of appropriate values (ro > 0) and the minimum is found graphically. 

---