Null Space Methods

The null space N of a matrix A is a matrix such that 

It is very important to know the null space N of the underdimensioned matrix E for the following property. If we know a solution, z, of the underdimensioned system 

the constrained problem (11.16) and (11.17) is easily transformed into the following unconstrained problem  

Once the vector y is calculated, the vector xs is obtained from (11.35), vhereas the vector Is is evaluated from the system 

Solve the problem from Example 11.3 using the null space obtained through LQ factorization. 

---

The decomposition of the matrix using the null space method proceeds along the following steps ... 

To lessen experimental time, the null-point method may be employed by locating the pulse spacing, tnun, for which no magnetization is observed after the 180°-1-90° pulse-sequence. The relaxation rate is then obtained directly by using the relationship / , = 0.69/t n. In this way, a considerable diminution of measuring time is achieved, which is especially desirable in measurements of very low relaxation-rates, or for samples that are not very stable. In addition, estimates of relaxation rates for overlapping resonances can often be achieved. However, as the recovery curves for coupled spin-systems are, more often than not, nonexponential, observation of the null point may violate the initial-slope approximation. Hence, this method is best reserved for preliminary experiments that serve to establish the time scale for spin-lattice relaxation, and for qualitative conclusions. 

If the matrix Q is positive semidefinite (positive definite) when projected into the null space of the active constraints, then (3-98) is (strictly) convex and the QP is a global (and unique) minimum. Otherwise, local solutions exist for (3-98), and more extensive global optimization methods are needed to obtain the global solution. Like LPs, convex QPs can be solved in a finite number of steps. However, as seen in Fig. 3-57, these optimal solutions can lie on a vertex, on a constraint boundary, or in the interior. A number of active set strategies have been created that solve the KKT conditions of the QP and incorporate efficient updates of active constraints. Popular methods include null space algorithms, range space methods, and Schur complement methods. As with LPs, QP problems can also be solved with interior point methods [see Wright (1996)]. 

Null space. If the product of two matrices is a zero matrix (all zeros), ax = 0 is said to be a homogeneous equation. The matrix jc is said to be the null space of a. Tn Mathematica a basis for the null space of a can be calculated by use of Null Space [a]. There is a degree of arbitrariness in the null space in that it provides a basis, and alternative forms can be calculated from it, that are equivalent. See Equation 5.1-19 for a method to calculate a basis for the null space by hand. When a basis for the null space of a matrix needs to be compared with another matrix of the same dimensions, they are both row reduced. If the two matrices have the same row-reduced form, they are equivalent. 

Therefore, the linear inverse problem (10.4) can have an infinite number of equivalent solutions. All these nonradiating currents form a so-called null-space of the linear inverse problem (10.4). In principle, we can overcome this difficulty using a regularization method, which restricts the class of the inverse excess currents j in equation (10.4) to physically meaningful solutions only. We will discuss an approach to the solution of this problem below, considering a quasi-linear method. 

An alternative to the method of Lagrange multipliers for imposing the necessary constraints is sketched below. It derives a lower dimensional unconstrained problem from the original constrained problem by using an orthogonal basis for the null space of the constraint matrix. This method is well suited to the potentially rank-deficient problem at hand, where steps may be taken to... 

Maximum cardinality EFMA was implemented as a minimal invasive extension to Efmtool and fully utilizes the computational advantages of the binary null space implementation of the DD method. Both factors, the maximum cardinality EFMA strategy and the binary implementation, result in a major speedup that outperforms other, MlLP-based approaches by orders of magnitude. 

Since there is only one column in A (corresponding to a single reaction), rank(A) = 1. To compute the set of concentrations orthogonal to the stoichiometric subspace, we compute the null space of A . Hence, since the rank of A is one, we expect the rank of the null space to be (3 - 1) = 2. We may compute the null space using standard methods such as elementary row operations. It... 

We find that rank(A) = 3. Hence, exactly two vectors are expected to form the null space of A. Computing nuU(A ) by standard methods, it is possible to show the vectors... 

An alternative method for computing S exists that relies on computing a basis for the null space of the stoichiometric matrix A. Vectors belonging to null (A ) are normal to S, and these vectors may be related to bounding hyperplane constraints that define S. This method is described in Feinberg (1987,2000a, 2000b). 

Lastly, it is also possible to use the method that exploits the null space of the constraints. Once again in this case, all the active bounds must first be removed from the problem. Only then it is possible to use either LQ factorization or a stable Gauss factorization of all the equality and active inequality constraints. This gives the KKT conditions for an unconstrained problem, as has already been demonstrated for equality constraints. 

If the null space is not obtained with LQ factorization, the point is not projected orthogonally in the space of constraints, although they are satisfied. This alternative is exploited in other methods discussed in Section 13.5. 

The main difference with projection methods is in the use of the null space of the active constraints obtained with Gauss factorization in spite of the projection matrix. 

Figure 2.1 Decomposition effort for null- and range space method (flops=number of floating point operations)...

In this section we extend the null-field method to the case of an arbitrary nrnnber of particles by using the translation properties of the vector spherical wave functions. Taking into account the geometric restriction that the particles do not overlap in space, we derive the expression of the transition matrix for restricted values of translations. Our treatment closely follows the original derivation given by Peterson and Strom [187,188]. 

The null-field method is used to compute the T matrix of each individual particle and the T-matrix formalism is employed to analyze systems of particles. For homogeneous, composite and layered, axisymmetric particles, the null-field method with discrete sources is applied to improve the munerical stability of the conventional method. Evanescent wave scattering and scattering by a half-space with randomly distributed particles are also discussed. To extend the domain of applicability of the method, plane waves and Gaussian laser beams are considered as external excitations. 

Fig. 3.6 Thomson s vibrating condenser method. A, space filled with an inert gas at low pressure P, potentiometer G, null instrument...

In conclusion, we present in this communication an alternative method for optimizing homogeneous catalysts. This concept is based on iterative modelling and synthesis steps. We do not claim to replace serendipity in catalyst discovery and optimization using this approach. Rather, we believe that this approach can complement serendipity by steering synthetic chemists clear from null regions of the catalyst space. 

---