Nucleophilic attack solvation

A qualitative difference in the type of solvation (not simply in the strength of solvation) in a series of nucleophiles may contribute to curvature. Jencks has examined this possibility. " " An example is the reaction of phenoxide, alkoxide, and hydroxide ions with p-nitrophenyl thiolacetate, the Br insted-type plot showing Pnuc = 0.68 for phenoxide ions (the weaker nucleophiles) and Pnu = 0.17 for alkoxide ions. It is suggested that the need for desolvation of the alkoxide ions prior to nucleophilic attack results in their decreased nucleophilicity relative to the phenoxide ions, which do not require this desolvation step. 

In these solvents at sufficiently low Br2 concentration (< 10-3 m) the kinetics are first order both in the olefin and in Br2 and the main solvent effect consists of an electrophilic solvation of the departing Br ion. A nucleophilic assistance by hydroxylic solvents has also been recognized recently (ref. 26) (Scheme 10). So far, return during the olefin bromination in methanol had been admitted only for alkylideneadamantanes, and was ascribed to steric inhibition to nucleophilic attack at carbons of the bromonium ion (ref. 26). 

The EAN of iron in this complex is 34, but it may be a solvated ion. Treatment of the salt with water gives 2-butanone, which was presumed to have been formed via nucleophilic attack on the cation to give a TT-allyl alcohol complex. This complex was then assumed to rearrange via the tricarbonyl hydride to an enol complex, which collapses to the ketone ... 

Calculations were then refined by introducing electrophilic assistance by or Li", solvation of H by water, and optimization of the angle of nucleophilic attack. These conections are introduced either separately or simultaneously. It is found that the stereochemical influence of anion solvation is negligible, compared with that of the other two factors. In all cases, the shapes of the curves are only slightly modified, as can be seen by comparing Fig. 5 and 6 with Fig. 3 and 4. 

For substitution at a carbonyl carbon, the nucleophilicity order is not the same as it is at a saturated carbon, but follows the basicity order more closely. The reason is presumably that the carbonyl carbon, with its partial positive charge, resembles a proton more than does the carbon at a saturated center. That is, a carbonyl carbon is a much harder acid than a saturated carbon. The following nucleophilicity order for these substrates has been de-termmined 321 Me2C=NO- > EtO" > MeO > OH" > OAr- > N-f > F" > H20 > Br" I". Soft bases are ineffective at a carbonyl carbon.322 In a reaction carried out in the gas phase with alkoxide nucleophiles OR solvated by only one molecule of an alcohol R OH, it was found that both RO and R O" attacked the formate substrate (HCOOR") about equally, though in the unsolvated case, the more basic alkoxide is the better nucleophile.323 In this study, the product ion R"0 was also solvated by one molecule of ROH or R OH. 

Chemical reactivity is influenced by solvation in different ways. As noted before, the solvent modulates the intrinsic characteristics of the reactants, which are related to polarization of its charge distribution. In addition, the interaction between solute and solvent molecules gives rise to a differential stabilization of reactants, products and transition states. The interaction of solvent molecules can affect both the equilibrium and kinetics of a chemical reaction, especially when there are large differences in the polarities of the reactants, transition state, or products. Classical examples that illustrate this solvent effect are the SN2 reaction, in which water molecules induce large changes in the kinetic and thermodynamic characteristics of the reaction, and the nucleophilic attack of an R-CT group on a carbonyl centre, which is very exothermic and occurs without an activation barrier in the gas phase but is clearly endothermic with a notable activation barrier in aqueous solution [76-79]. 

A. Howard and P. A. Kollman, OH- versus SH- nucleophilic attack on amides dramatically different gas-phase and solvation energetics, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110 (1988) 7195-7200. 

Ozonolysis of 3-trimethylsilyloxyindene 1142 in the presence of methanol affords 3-hydroperoxy-3-phenyldihy-droisocoumarin via selective cleavage of the ozonide 1143 followed by an intramolecular nucleophilic attack onto the solvated carbonyl in the intermediate 1144 (Scheme 284) <1999JOC2137>. 

The photostimulated reactions of thiolate anions with 2-halo-2 -nitropropane derivatives yield both oc-nitrosulphides via an S l pathway and disulphides (equation 71a)282 284. In contrast with the case of the oxidative dimerisation products of the mono-enolates, the disulphides are formed via an ionic mechanism nucleophilic attack by the thiolate anion on the a-halogen and subsequent reaction of a second thiolate with the sulphenyl halide. As expected for such a process, disulphide formation is favoured (and thus a-nitrosulphide formation is disfavoured) the more nucleophilic the thiolate (i.e. derived from a less acidic thiol) and the easier the abstraction of the halo-substituent (i.e. I > Br > Cl). Use of the protic solvent methanol instead of the usual dipolar aprotic solvents for the reaction of equation 71a is detrimental to the yield of the S l substitution products exclusively disulphides are formed285 (equation 71b). Methanol solvation probably retards the dissociation of the radical anion intermediate in the SRN reaction, into radical and anion, and hence retards the chain reaction relative to the ionic reaction. The non-nucleophilic methylsulphinate ion gives only an S l reaction product with 2-bromo-2-nitropropane286. 

---