Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Nuclear charge estimating

The interionic distance in crystalline KCl is 3.14 A. Use Slater s mles to determine the effective nuclear charge Z g, and hence deduce the ionic radii of K+ and Cl by assuming that ionic radius is inversely proportional to effective nuclear charge estimated from Slater s rules. [For a discussion of univalent radii and crystal radii, see L. Pauling, Nature of the Chemical Bond, 3rd edn., Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1960, pp. 511-9.]... [Pg.30]

H = di(Z—iy di are the potential parameters I is the orbital quantum number 3 characterizes the spin direction Z is the nuclear charge). Our experience has show / that such a model potential is convenient to use for calculating physical characteristics of metals with a well know electronic structure. In this case, by fitting the parameters di, one reconstructs the electron spectrum estimated ab initio with is used for further calculations. [Pg.142]

Using the more advanced quantum chemical computational methods it is now possible to determine the fundamental electronic properties of zeolite structural units. The quantum chemical basis of Loewenstein s "aluminum avoidance" rule is explored, and the topological features of energy expectation value functionals within an abstract "nuclear charge space" model yield quick estimates for energy relations for zeolite structural units. [Pg.145]

A series of episodes in the historical development of our view of chemical atoms are presented. Emphasis is placed on the key observations that drove chemists and physicists to conclude that atoms were real objects and to envision their stracture and properties. The kinetic theory of gases and measmements of gas transport yielded good estimates for atomic size. The discovery of the electrorr, proton and neutron strongly irtfluenced discttssion of the constitution of atoms. The observation of a massive, dertse nucleus by alpha particle scattering and the measrrrement of the nuclear charge resrrlted in an enduring model of the nuclear atom. The role of optical spectroscopy in the development of a theory of electronic stracture is presented. The actors in this story were often well rewarded for their efforts to see the atoms. [Pg.90]

For most elements, subtracting the total number of inner-shell electrons from the nuclear charge provides a convenient estimate of the effective nuclear charge, as Figure 5.30 illustrates. [Pg.170]

Such expansions are very useful while evaluating the relative contributions of separate terms of the Hamiltonian to the total energy. They are of particular importance for the estimation of the role of correlation and relativistic effects. Equation (21.17) shows that the correlation effects are proportional to the first, whereas the main relativistic effects (21.18) are proportional to the fourth power of the nuclear charge. Therefore, with the increase of Z the relativistic effects start to predominate very rapidly. [Pg.257]

Use the data in Table 5.1 to estimate effective nuclear charges and screening constants for the inner-shell orbitals in Na+ and Cl-. Comment on the trends in screening constants. [Pg.86]

We choose three test molecules formaldehyde, proline and 2-phenylphenoxide. The structure of these systems is shown in Figure 1.8. The calculations were performed in vacuo and in water solution, with the C and the D versions of PCM with the standard and the simultaneous approaches. Here we note that we used the same solute-shaped cavity for all the optimizations of each system. The force field we used for all the calculations, both in vacuo and in solution, is the UFF [35] and the nuclear charges at the initial point were estimated with the QEq [36] algorithm. As we are not interested in obtaining results comparable with experimental data or with other calculations, but only in the PCM results with the different optimization schemes, the choice of the force field is not a critical point. The only requirement is that we performed all the calculations with the same force field. [Pg.74]


See other pages where Nuclear charge estimating is mentioned: [Pg.410]    [Pg.657]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.679]    [Pg.827]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.646]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.550]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.550]    [Pg.637]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.3827]    [Pg.646]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.297]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.253 ]




SEARCH



Nuclear charge

© 2024 chempedia.info