Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Normalization factor definition

This is easily shown by using a lattice in r-space to define the functional integral. Some necessary normalization factors are absorbed into the definition of the integration measure. A similar calculation yields... [Pg.122]

We now turn to the effective operator definitions produced by (2.14) with model eigenfunctions that incorporate the normalization factors of (2.16) so their true counterparts are unity normed. Equations (2.27) and (2.38) show these model eigenfunctions to be the a)o and ( that are defined in (2.33) and (2.34). Substituting Eqs. (2.27) and (2.38) into (2.14) and proceeding as in the derivation of the forms / = I-I1I, yields the state-independent definitions A, A" and A" of Table I. Notice that the effective Hamiltonian H is identically produced upon taking A = // in the effective operator A". Table I indicates that this convenient property is not shared by all the effective operator definitions. [Pg.483]

The effective operator A is the state-independent part of the definition AL/3, i = I-III. The operator A can thus be obtained by combining the perturbation expansions of its normalization factors and of A into a single expression [73] or by computing these normalization factors and A separately. These combined and noncombined forms of A[, may differ when computed approximately (see Section VI and paper II). The calculation of with the noncombined form is the same as with A since the model eigenvectors used with A are obtained by multiplying those utilized with A[,p by the above normalization factors. The operators and A are nevertheless different and, thus, do not have necessarily the same properties, for example, the conservation of commutation relations studied in Section IV. [Pg.483]

Complications arise here that are absent with state-independent effective operators. The effective operators in (4.16) cannot merely be replaced by their definitions from Table I since the latter may not be applied directly to any vector of the space Oq because of their normalization factors. These factors are associated with the model eigenvectors on which the operators act to produce the matrix elements A. Consequently, arbitrary bras and kets of flp must first be expanded in the basis of these eigenvectors before a state-dependent definition can be used with them. This represents a serious drawback with the use of state-dependent effective operators. [Pg.495]

Equation (B.15) also applies if the normalization factors are absorbed into new mapping operators. Proceeding similarly as in Section II.D, the definition... [Pg.526]

In all of the applications of the 2N Newton-Raphson method which follow, both the functions and the variables were normalized for the purpose of reducing roundoff error. The functions Fj and Gj are stated in a normalized form. The definition of the 0/s contains a normalizing factor, namely, (Lj/Vj)a. Temperatures were normalized by dividing each temperature by some base temperature. Although other more precise methods of normalization may be used such as the... [Pg.139]

If the function f(f) is derivable, the term between brackets vanishes and the relationship in Equation 9.120 is demonstrated. It can be remarked that the coefficient in front of the integral operator in the Fourier definition is indifferent in this demonstration it plays only the role of a normalizing factor for having a unitary transform, that is, which gives the same resnlt when using the inverse transform (which is written in a symmetrical expression by changing jnst the sign of the parameter co). [Pg.403]

The set made by the three p-type functions in a Gaussian type orbital (GTO) framework is sufQciently simple to be used as an example but at the same time provides a yet unexplored context, which can show how QS techniques can handle quantum system states, even degenerate ones. The set of p-type Gaussian functions can be collected into a vector, which can be associated in turn to three degenerate model wavefunctions Ip) = qr exp(-alrP) where q is a normalization factor, r = (x,y,z), and a is an arbitrary positive-definite parameter. The set of attached DF can be also written as a vector Id) = q (r r) exp (-2alrP), where the position vector product symbol is defined employing the inward product (r r) = Thus, the components... [Pg.355]

In some definitions of ttie correlation function (5,17), Q is used as a normalization factor, dividing equation 20. This normalization factor does not change the shape of the correlation fonction, affectii only fee scaling of fee y-axis if Q is used as a normalization fector, the correlation function will range between -1 and +1. The invariant is the total area under the scattering curve. [Pg.17]

While the above determination is being carried out, a blank determination is conducted in exactly the same manner. This is essential because changes in the acetic acid-iodine solution make it inadvisable to assign a definite normality factor to this solution. [Pg.171]

The form of the normalization factor used in Eq. (D.19) is more general. In the definition of the quantum ensembles we will not need to introduce factors of 1/2 as we did for the classical ensembles, because these factors come out naturally when we include in the averages the normalization factor mentioned above. [Pg.587]

Brightness temperature The definition is not unique great care is needed to decipher the intention of a given author. The temperature at which a blackbody radiator would radiate an intensity of electromagnetic radiation identical to that of the planet for a specific frequency, frequency bandwidth, and polarization under consideration is one definition of brightness temperature. A second definition is that it is the intensity of radiation under consideration divided (normalized) by the factor jlk). The normalization factor dimensionally scales... [Pg.245]

The mercury barometer (Fig. 10-11) indicates directly the absolute pressure of the atmosphere in terms of height of the mercuiy column. Normal (standard) barometric pressure is 101.325 kPa by definition. Equivalents of this pressure in other units are 760 mm mercury (at 0°C), 29.921 iuHg (at 0°C), 14.696 IbFin, and 1 atm. For cases in which barometer readings, when expressed by the height of a mercuiy column, must be corrected to standard temperature (usually 0°C), appropriate temperature correction factors are given in ASME PTC, op. cit., pp. 23-26 and Weast, Handbook of Chemistty and Physics, 59th ed., Chemical Rubber, Cleveland, 1978-1979, pp. E39-E41. [Pg.890]


See other pages where Normalization factor definition is mentioned: [Pg.172]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.591]    [Pg.2233]    [Pg.2751]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.640]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.911]    [Pg.972]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.611]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.661]    [Pg.449]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.6 ]




SEARCH



Factor normalized

Factor normalizing

Normal Definition

Normalization factor

Normalization, definition

© 2024 chempedia.info