Normalisation wavefunction

Denoting the unperturbed and perturbed normalised wavefunctions (usually for the ground state) by 0 and respectively, we have, for the uniform field,... 

T indicates that the integration is over all space. Wavefunctions which satisfy this condition re said to be normalised. It is usual to require the solutions to the Schrodinger equation to be rthogonal ... 

Vhen used in this context, the Kronecker delta can be taken to have a value of 1 if m equals n nd zero otherwise. Wavefunctions that are both orthogonal and normalised are said to be rthonormal. 

The normalisation factor is assumed. It is often convenient to indicate the spin of each electron in the determinant this is done by writing a bar when the spin part is P (spin down) a function without a bar indicates an a spin (spin up). Thus, the following are all commonly used ways to write the Slater determinantal wavefunction for the beryllium atom (which has the electronic configuration ls 2s ) ... 

VVc can now see why the normalisation factor of the Slater determinantal wavefunction is I v/N . If each determinant contains N terms then the product of two Slater determinants, ldeU rminant][determinant], contains (N ) terms. However, if the spin orbitals form an oi lhonormal set then oidy products of identical terms from the determinant will be nonzero when integrated over all space. We Ccm illustrate this with the three-electron example, k ljiiiidering just the first two terms in the expansion we obtain the following ... 

For a given set of nuclear coordinates R and a stationary electronic wavefunction CFel) normalised to 1 (i.e., (vPel f el) = 1 holds true), the electronic energy can be calculated in the Bom-Oppenheimer approximation as the expectation value of the electronic Hamiltonian operator as follows ... 

The only restriction for the gradient evaluation is that the wavefunction has to be normalised, i.e. 

In order to normalise the wavefunction, it needs to be multiplied by in order to ensure that... 

In this equation and k denote the standard Coulomb and exchange operators involving core orbital (pi, D and D(ji v) stand for the normalisation integral for the SC wavefunction and the elements of the first-order density matrix in the space of the SC orbitals, and and k, are generalised Coulomb and exchange operators with matrix elements = XikMq )AXp K u Xq) = At least Voutofthe Af... 

Psc Tf P j ), etc. It should be mentioned that eqn (3.26) is slightly more general than the expression reported in refs. 62-64 which is valid only if the reference SC wavefunction is normalised, i.e. for >Soo = 1- The optimal virtual orbitals are calculated through minimisation of E. The final SCVB wavefunction is constructed as a non-orthogonal Cl expansion including all single and double excitations l/ l/ ... 

Eqs. (27) and (28) have been developed and defined entirely within a. time-independent framework. These equations are identical to Eqs. 35 and 32 respectively of Ref. [39]. They differ only in that a different, more appropriate, normalisation has been used here for the continuum wavefunction and that the transition dipole moment function has not been expanded in terms a spherical harmonic basis of angular functions. AU the analysis jrreviously given in Ref. [39] continues to be valid. In particular, the details of the angular distributions of the various differential cross sections and the relationships between the OTious possible integral and differential cross sections have been described in that paper. 

The special significance of the ground state emerges as follows let ip be any wavefunction (not necessarily normalised) in the space of the exact solutions % of eigenenergies en. Expand ip = fTiinCn- Then the expectation value... 

The next point to note is the existence of so-called penetrating orbits,8 i.e. the occurrence of wavefunctions of the type shown in fig. 2.5. These are wavefunctions whose innermost loop penetrates the core, but which are otherwise quite hydrogenic, as expected in the outer reaches of the atom. For large enough n, such wavefunctions recapitulate as indeed do the radial wavefunctions of H this means that, apart from a normalisation factor, the inner part changes very slowly with increasing n beyond the first few values, as can be seen in fig. 2.5, and that the radial positions of all except the outermost nodes are stable. 

Fig. 3.1. Recapitulation of the inner nodes for radial Coulomb wavefunctions also shown are the near-threshold continuum function with delta function normalisation (dotted curve) and two continnum functions above the threshold (adapted from H. Friedrich [112]).

In fig. 3. 1, wavefunctions for bound states and for the continuum state lying near threshold (e —> 0) are shown. In order to compare them, one has to normalise the continuum functions, which are not square-integrable. This difficulty is resolved by requiring... 

The function u(r) is the product of r and the radial wavefunction, and its normalisation is chosen so that... 

Before deriving the explicit form of the matrix U in terms of the operator X it should be mentioned that the spectrum of the Dirac operator Hd is invariant under arbitrary similarity transformations, i.e., non-singular (invertible) transformations U, whether they are unitary or not. But only unitary transformations conserve the normalisation of the Dirac spinor and leave scalar products and matrix elements invariant. Therefore a restriction to unitary transformations is inevitable as soon as one is interested in properties of the wavefunction. Furthermore, the problem experiences a great technical simplification by the choice of a unitary transformation, since the inverse transformation U can in general hardly be accomplished if U was not unitary. 

For the photodissociation of a triatomic molecule, the asymptotic form of the final state, continuum wavefunction, correctly normalised on the energy scale[42], may be written as[39] ... 

E is a scalar and so can be taken outside the integral, thus leading to Equation (2.7). If the wavefunction is normalised then the denominator in Equation (2.7) will equal 1. 

A convenient way to express both the orthogonality of different wavefunctions and the normalisation conditions uses the Kronecker delta ... 

The factor (1/V ) ensures that the wavefunction is normalised. Of the three acceptable spatial forms that we have described so far, two are symmetric (i.e. do not change sign when the electron labels are exchanged) and one is antisymmetric (the sign changes when the electrons are exchanged) ... 

As before, xi (1) is used to indicate a fxmction that depends on the space and spin coordinates of the electron labelled 1. The factor l/ /M ensures that the wavefunction is normalised we shall see later why the normalisation factor has this particular value. This functional form of the wavefunction is called a Slater determinant and is the simplest form of an orbital wave-fxmction that satisfies the antisymmetry principle. The Slater determinant is a particularly convenient and concise way to represent the wavefunction due to the special properties of determinants. Exchanging any two rows of a determinant, a process which corresponds to exchanging two electrons, changes the sign of the determinant and therefore directly leads to the antisymmetry property. If any two rows of a determinant are identical, which would correspond to two electrons being assigned to the same spin orbital, then the determinant vanishes. This can be considered a manifestation of the Pauli principle, which states that no two electrons can have the same set of quantum numbers. The Pauli principle also leads to the notion that each spatial orbital can accommodate two electrons of opposite spins. 

A is the normalisation factor, whose value is not important in our present discussion. To calculate the energy of the groxmd state of the hydrogen molecule for a fixed intemuclear distance we first write the wavefunction as a 2 x 2 determinant ... 

In general, a quantum mechanical calculation provides molecular orbitals that are normalised but the total wavefunction is not. The normalisation constant for the wavefunction of the two-electron hydrogen molecule is 1/V and so the denominator in Equation (2.73) is equal to 2. 

We take a variational approach so that there is no question of requiring an exact solution of the Schrodinger equation for reference. Let J be a variational trial function for the valence electrons of a many-electron system and let h be the valence many-electron Hamiltonian. We seek a minimum in the mean value of H with respect to such (normalised) trial functions together with the constraint that be orthogonal to the wavefunction of a subset of the electrons (the core). We will then recast the equation into a pseudopotential form and examine this form with a view to modelling the pseudopotential. 

---