Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Noncompetitive immunoassays antibody specificity

Fig. 4. Classification of reported noncompetitive immunoassays for haptens based on the assay principle. (A) Assays that include a chemical modification of hapten to allow sandwich-type detection. (B1) Improved single-antibody immunometric assays that separate immune complex and excess labeled antibody, either by using a hapten-immobilized affinity column or based on differences in their physical properties. (B2) A variation of single-antibody immunometric assays based on masking of unoccupied antibody by an immunoreactive macromolecule followed by selective capture and detection of the hapten-occupied antibody. (C) Assays employing a probe molecule specific to a hapten-antibody complex. Fig. 4. Classification of reported noncompetitive immunoassays for haptens based on the assay principle. (A) Assays that include a chemical modification of hapten to allow sandwich-type detection. (B1) Improved single-antibody immunometric assays that separate immune complex and excess labeled antibody, either by using a hapten-immobilized affinity column or based on differences in their physical properties. (B2) A variation of single-antibody immunometric assays based on masking of unoccupied antibody by an immunoreactive macromolecule followed by selective capture and detection of the hapten-occupied antibody. (C) Assays employing a probe molecule specific to a hapten-antibody complex.
Using an antibody specifically recognizing the antigen-antibody complex, more direct noncompetitive hapten immunoassays, which can be regarded as semi two-site immunometric assay, could be established (S3). Figure 14 depicts two typical procedures of noncompetitive assays using anti-metatype antibodies, which are based on principle C in Fig. 4. [Pg.162]

The analytical detection limits of competitive and noncompetitive immunoassays are determined principally by the affinity of the antibody and the detection limit of the label used, respectively. Calculations have indicated that a lower limit of detection of lOfmol/L (Le., 600,000 molecules of analyte in a typical sample volume of 100 jiL) is possible in a competitive assay using an antibody with an affinity of iO L/mol. Table 9-2 illustrates the detection limits for isotopic and nonisotopic labels. A radioactive label, such as l, has low specific activity (7.5 million labels necessary for detection of 1 disintegration/s) compared with enzyme labels and chemiluminescent and fluorescent labels. Enzyme labels provide an amplification (each enzyme label produces many detectable product molecules), and the detection limit for an enzyme can be improved by replacing the conventional photometric detection reaction by a chemiluminescent or bioluminescent reaction. The combination of amplification and an ultrasensitive detection reaction makes noncompetitive chemiluminescent EIAs among the most sensitive types of immunoassay. Fluorescent labels also have... [Pg.233]

Noncompetitive (also known as two-site, sandwich, labeled antibody, or immunometric methods) (see Chapter 9) require two antibodies capable of simultaneously binding PTH (Figure 49-14) (1) a capture antibody immobilized to a solid phase, and (2) a signal or reporter antibody labeled with a measurable substance or an enzyme changing the concentration (substrate or product) of a measurable substance. Unlike competitive immunoassays, with noncompetitive methods, both antibodies are added in excess, ensuring that aU analyte is measured. After formation of the ternary complex or sandwich, excess labeled antibody is removed by washing before quantification of complexes. Noncompetitive immunoassays provide increased sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility, and convenience. [Pg.1916]

We (K1) attempted to develop a noncompetitive assay based on the anti-idiotype antibodies for a conjugated bile acid metabolite, ursodeoxycholic acid 7-A-acetyl-glucosaminide (UDCA 7-NAG), which is expected to serve as a diagnostic index for an autoimmune disease, primary biliary cirrhosis. In our assay, the hapten UDCA 7-NAG, a /3-type antibody, and a biotin-labeled a-type antibody were simultaneously added to a microtiter plate coated with an F(ab )2 fragment of a specific anti-UDCA 7-NAG antibody, then incubated at room temperature for 8 h. Bound biotin was then detected with HRP-labeled streptavidin, whose enzyme activity was measured using o-phenylenediamine/H202 as a substrate. This noncompetitive assay system provided a subfemtomole-order sensitivity (detection limit 118 amol) that was 7 times lower than the competitive immunoassay using the same anti-hapten antibody (K2), even with a common colorimetric detection (Fig. 13). Somewhat improved specificity was also obtained namely, better... [Pg.160]

Currently, one of the most sensitive EIA methods is the immune complex transfer immunoassay, which is a heterogeneous and noncompetitive EIA. This system can measure zeptomole per assay levels of protein antigens and antibodies as well as attomole per assay levels of several haptens. In this method, the primary immune reaction occurs on a solid support, after which the immune complexes are specifically... [Pg.2170]


See other pages where Noncompetitive immunoassays antibody specificity is mentioned: [Pg.320]    [Pg.953]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.1570]    [Pg.1983]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.2123]    [Pg.2170]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.98]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.50 , Pg.52 ]




SEARCH



Antibodies specificity

Antibodies, specific

Immunoassay noncompetitive

Immunoassay specificity

© 2024 chempedia.info