Non-correlated perturbation

Finally, we would like to mention Pople s (1986) recent work this treats the derivatives of the (MP) correlation energy as a double perturbation problem, with respect to a physical perturbation (e.g. nuclear coordinate change) and a non-physical perturbation (electron correlation). This provides a unified theory for the treatment of geometry and property derivatives at the correlated level. 

Matsunaga et al. [110] introduced VSCF-DPT2, a method that includes the effects of degeneracies in the anharmonic vibrational spectra. The essential extension is to use Degenerate Perturbation Theory (as opposed to Non-degenerate Perturbation Theory) in introducing correlation effects. Also this method was interfaced with electronic strucmre codes, and is incorporated in gamess. There have been several applications of ab initio spectroscopy calculations with this method. 

So what is wrong with it In this form it is still perturbative, implicitly assuming that the correlation perturbation is relatively small. For many problems we want more flexiblity than offered by perturbation theory. This leads to non-perturbative approaches where various categories of terms in MBPT are summed to all orders. One such method would be to make denominator shifts, so a denominator in perturbation theory like Si — Sa could be replaced by Si — — (aiWai). By adding the anti-symmetrized... 

In connection with the general problem of polyion counter-ion interaction some very important results have been published by Zundel [4]. An example is his work on the SO3 group in salts of polystyrene sulfonate. The unperturbed -SOJ group is expected to have C v symmetry and the SO stretching modes are therefore classified as A (symmetrical) and E (asymmetrical, degenerate). A non-symmetrical perturbation will be expected to split the degenerate E mode as may be seen from a correlation of the irreducible representations of and Q... 

Another approach to electron correlation is Moller-Plesset perturbation theory. Qualitatively, Moller-Plesset perturbation theory adds higher excitations to Hartree-Fock theory as a non-iterative correction, drawing upon techniques from the area of mathematical physics known as many body perturbation theory. 

General anaesthetics have been in use for the last 100 years, yet their mechanism of action are still not yet clearly defined. For many years it was thought that general anaesthetics exerted their effects by dissolving in cell membranes and perturbing the lipid environment in a non-specific manner. This theory derived from the observation that for a number of drugs which induced anaesthesia, their potency correlated with their oil-water partition coefficients. This Meyer-Oveiton correlation was accepted for a number of years, however in the last 15-20 years evidence has shown that a more likely theory is that of specific interactions of anaesthetics with proteins, particularly those within the CNS that mediate neurotransmission [1]. 

If we except the Density Functional Theory and Coupled Clusters treatments (see, for example, reference [1] and references therein), the Configuration Interaction (Cl) and the Many-Body-Perturbation-Theory (MBPT) [2] approaches are the most widely-used methods to deal with the correlation problem in computational chemistry. The MBPT approach based on an HF-SCF (Hartree-Fock Self-Consistent Field) single reference taking RHF (Restricted Hartree-Fock) [3] or UHF (Unrestricted Hartree-Fock ) orbitals [4-6] has been particularly developed, at various order of perturbation n, leading to the widespread MPw or UMPw treatments when a Moller-Plesset (MP) partition of the electronic Hamiltonian is considered [7]. The implementation of such methods in various codes and the large distribution of some of them as black boxes make the MPn theories a common way for the non-specialist to tentatively include, with more or less relevancy, correlation effects in the calculations. 

In order to systematically remedy the previous drawbacks, we recently proposed to perform a perturbation treatment, not on a wavefunction built iteratively, but on a wavefunction that already contains every components needed to properly account for the the chemistry of the problem under investigation [34], In that point of view, we mean that this zeroth-order wavefunction has to be at least qualitatively correct the quantitative aspects of the problem are expected to be recovered at the perturbation level that will include the remaining correlation effects that were not taken into account in the variational process any unbalanced error compensations or non-compensations between the correlation recovered for different states is thus avoided contrary to what might happen when using any truncated CIs. In this contribution, we will report the strategy developed along these lines for the determination of accurate electronic spectra and illustrate this process on the formaldehyde molecule H2CO taken as a benchmark. 

However, if this is not the case, the perturbations are large and perturbation theory is no longer appropriate. In other words, perturbation methods based on single-determinant wavefunctions cannot be used to recover non-dynamic correlation effects in cases where more than one configuration is needed to obtain a reasonable approximation to the true many-electron wavefunction. This represents a serious impediment to the calculation of well-correlated wavefunctions for excited states which is only possible by means of cumbersome and computationally expensive multi-reference Cl methods. 

---