Newtonian, definition

The usual approach for non-Newtonian fluids is to start with known results for Newtonian fluids and modify them to account for the non-Newtonian properties. For example, the definition of the Reynolds number for a power law fluid can be obtained by replacing the viscosity in the Newtonian definition by an appropriate shear rate dependent viscosity function. If the characteristic shear rate for flow over a sphere is taken to be V/d, for example, then the power law viscosity function becomes... 

The traditional view of emulsion stability (1,2) was concerned with systems of two isotropic, Newtonian Hquids of which one is dispersed in the other in the form of spherical droplets. The stabilization of such a system was achieved by adsorbed amphiphiles, which modify interfacial properties and to some extent the colloidal forces across a thin Hquid film, after the hydrodynamic conditions of the latter had been taken into consideration. However, a large number of emulsions, in fact, contain more than two phases. The importance of the third phase was recognized early (3) and the lUPAC definition of an emulsion included a third phase (4). With this relation in mind, this article deals with two-phase emulsions as an introduction. These systems are useful in discussing the details of formation and destabilization, because of their relative simplicity. The subsequent treatment focuses on three-phase emulsions, outlining three special cases. The presence of the third phase is shown in order to monitor the properties of the emulsion in a significant manner. 

The flow of compressible and non-compressible liquids, gases, vapors, suspensions, slurries and many other fluid systems has received sufficient study to allow definite evaluation of conditions for a variety of process situations for Newtonian fluids. For the non-Newtonian fluids, considerable data is available. However, its correlation is not as broad in application, due to the significant influence of physical and rheological properties. This presentation is limited to Newtonian systems, except where noted. 

As indicated in Section 3.7.9, this definition of ReMR may be used to determine the limit of stable streamline flow. The transition value (R ur)c is approximately the same as for a Newtonian fluid, but there is some evidence that, for moderately shear-thinning fluids, streamline flow may persist to somewhat higher values. Putting n = 1 in equation 3,140 leads to the standard definition of the Reynolds number. 

Time is a fundamental property of the physical world. Because time encompasses the antinomic qualities of transience and duration, the definition of time poses a dilemma for the formulation of a comprehensive physical theory. The partial elimination of time is a common solution to this dilemma. In his mechanical philosophy, Newton appears to resort to the elimination of the transient quality of time by identifying time with duration. It is suggested, however, that the transient quality of time may be identified as the active component of the Newtonian concept of inertia, a quasi occult quality of matter that is correlated with change, and that is essential to defining duration. The assignment of the transient quality of time to matter is a necessary consequence of Newton s attempt to render a world system of divine mathematical order. Newton s interest in alchemy reflects this view that matter is active and mutable in nature... 

In the case of non-Newtonian flow, it is necessary to use an appropriate apparent viscosity. Although the apparent viscosity (ia is defined by equation 1.71 in the same way as for a Newtonian fluid, it no longer has the same fundamental significance and other, equally valid, definitions of apparent viscosities may be made. In flow in a pipe, where the shear stress varies with radial location, the value of fxa varies. As pointed out in Example 3.1, it is the conditions near the pipe wall that are most important. The value of /j.a evaluated at the wall is given by... 

The presentation in this chapter dwells rather heavily on the classification, measurement, and interpretation of non-Newtonian behavior. These rheological fundamentals have frequently been presented in literature which is unfamiliar to the engineer and have usually included much discussion of factors which at the present time are of minor engineering interest. Accordingly, it was felt that one of the primary needs in this field was a concise summary of these fundamentals and common definitions. It is hoped that thereby future developments may be undertaken in an orderly and rigorous manner, as contrasted to the relatively fruitless empiricism which has enveloped areas of this field in the past. 

By definition the term non-Newtonian encompasses all materials which do not obey the direct proportionality between shear stress and shear rate depicted by Eq. (1). 

The property concept may appear so generic as not to require special attention. However, for thermodynamic purposes, the considered set of properties differs significantly from that in other areas of science. Allowed thermodynamic properties are closely tied to specific experimental circumstances of the chosen system, including its quiescence and stability, and a number of the variables that are commonly assumed in a Newtonian mechanical description (such as position and momentum) play no thermodynamic role. The following definition may be adopted ... 

With this bold stroke, Boltzmann escaped the futile attempt to describe microscopic molecular phenomena in terms of then-known Newtonian mechanical laws. Instead, he injected an essential probabilistic element that reduces the description of the microscopic domain to a statistical distribution of microstates, i.e., alternative microscopic ways of partitioning the total macroscopic energy U and volume V among the unknown degrees of freedom of the molecular domain, all such partitionings having equal a priori probability in the absence of definite information to the contrary. 

---