Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Multiple training-test

With the job-analysis information in hand, lOS developed the written examinations to measure the candidates job-related knowledge. For each test, lOS compiled a list of training manuals, department procedures, and other materials to use as sources for the test questions. lOS presented the proposed sources to the New Haven fire chief and assistant fire chief for their approval. Then, using the approved sources, lOS drafted a multiple-choice test for each position. Each 2666 test had 100 questions, as required by CSB rules, and was written below a lOth-grade reading level. After lOS prepared the tests, the City opened a 3-month study period. It gave candidates a list that identified the source material for the questions, including the specific chapters from which the questions were taken. [Pg.13]

Multiple linear regression analysis is a widely used method, in this case assuming that a linear relationship exists between solubility and the 18 input variables. The multilinear regression analy.si.s was performed by the SPSS program [30]. The training set was used to build a model, and the test set was used for the prediction of solubility. The MLRA model provided, for the training set, a correlation coefficient r = 0.92 and a standard deviation of, s = 0,78, and for the test set, r = 0.94 and s = 0.68. [Pg.500]

Motivation Unit tests require a substantial investment in time and resources to complete successfully. This is the case whether the test is a straightforward analysis of pump performance or a complex analysis of an integrated reactor and separation train. The uncertainties in the measurements, the likelihood that different underlying problems lead to the same symptoms, and the multiple interpretations of unit performance are barriers against accurate understanding of the unit operation. The goal of any unit test should be to maximize the success (i.e., to describe accurately unit performance) while minimizing the resources necessary to arrive at the description and the subsequent recommendations. The number of measurements and the number of trials should be selected so that they are minimized. [Pg.2562]

Aqueous solubility is selected to demonstrate the E-state application in QSPR studies. Huuskonen et al. modeled the aqueous solubihty of 734 diverse organic compounds with multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) approaches [27]. The set of structural descriptors comprised 31 E-state atomic indices, and three indicator variables for pyridine, ahphatic hydrocarbons and aromatic hydrocarbons, respectively. The dataset of734 chemicals was divided into a training set ( =675), a vahdation set (n=38) and a test set (n=21). A comparison of the MLR results (training, r =0.94, s=0.58 vahdation r =0.84, s=0.67 test, r =0.80, s=0.87) and the ANN results (training, r =0.96, s=0.51 vahdation r =0.85, s=0.62 tesL r =0.84, s=0.75) indicates a smah improvement for the neural network model with five hidden neurons. These QSPR models may be used for a fast and rehable computahon of the aqueous solubihty for diverse orgarhc compounds. [Pg.93]

Cabrera et al. [50] modeled a set of 163 drugs using TOPS-MODE descriptors with a linear discriminant model to predict p-glycoprotein efflux. Model accuracy was 81% for the training set and 77.5% for a validation set of 40 molecules. A "combinatorial QSAR" approach was used by de Lima et al. [51] to test multiple model types (kNN, decision tree, binary QSAR, SVM) with multiple descriptor sets from various software packages (MolconnZ, Atom Pair, VoSurf, MOE) for the prediction of p-glycoprotein substrates for a dataset of 192 molecules. Best overall performance on a test set of 51 molecules was achieved with an SVM and AP or VolSurf descriptors (81% accuracy each). [Pg.459]

Controlling the complexity of a model is called regularization. To this end, hold-out data is important. In order to benefit from a training set that is as large as possible and still to be able to measure the performance on unseen data, cross validation is used. It does multiple iterations of training and testing on different partitionings of the data. Leave-one-out is certainly the most prominent concept here [154] however, other ways to partition are in use as well. [Pg.76]

Another QSAR study utilizing 14 flavonoid derivatives in the training set and 5 flavonoid derivatives in the test set was performed by Moon et al. (211) using both multiple linear regression analysis and neural networks. Both statistical methods identified that the Hammett constant a, the HOMO energy, the non-overlap steric volume, the partial charge of C3 carbon atom, and the HOMO -coefficient of C3, C3, and C4 carbon atoms of flavonoids play an important role in inhibitory activity (Eqs. 3-5, Table 5). [Pg.476]

Reading comprehension tests are usually in a multiple-choice format and ask questions based on brief passages, much like the standardized tests that are offered in schools. For that matter, almost all standardized test questions test your reading skills. After all, you can t answer the question if you can t read it Similarly, you can t study your training materials or learn new procedures once you are on the job if you can t read well. So, reading comprehension is vital not only on the test but also for the rest of your career. [Pg.135]

Recommendation 5-4. The Army should develop and demonstrate methods of chemical analysis to confirm the destruction of VX in the hydrolysate at the Newport facility. These methods should include procedural specifications and provisions for training so that confirmation at the required detection limits can be confirmed by testing by different analysts at multiple laboratories. [Pg.20]


See other pages where Multiple training-test is mentioned: [Pg.333]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.1326]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.1035]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.505]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.43]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.333 ]




SEARCH



Multiple Trains

Multiple testing

Multiple testing multiplicity

© 2024 chempedia.info