Multiple indicator dilution method

An alternative method to position two electrodes at nanometer distances apart is the mechanically-controlled, break junction (MCBJ) technique. An ultra-thin, notched Au wire on a flexible substrate can be broken reliably by pushing on the Au with a piezoelectric piston, cracking the Au (Fig. 4). This produces a gap between the Au shards whose size can be finely varied to 1 A by a piston or control rod [46, 47]. When UE molecules with thiol groups on both ends are present in a surrounding solution, the gap can be adjusted until the molecules can span it. A dilute solution means the number of spanning molecules will be small, and the least-common-multiple of current flow among many junctions indicates those spanned by a single molecule [47]. 

The chemist will pay particular attention to samples, which were diluted in the course of analysis. The concentrations of laboratory contaminants that may be present in the samples, as indicated by contaminated instrument or method blanks, will be magnified by the multiplication by the dilution factor and create false positive results of high concentration values. 

The diligent analyst would develop a robust method with rigorous matrix effect tests on multiple lots, including hemolyzed and lipidemic samples. An initial test would be a spike-recovery evaluation on at least six individual lots. Samples should be spiked at or near the LLOQ, and at a high level near the ULOQ. If matrix interference were indicated by unacceptable relative error (RE) percentage in certain lots, the spiked sample of the unacceptable lots should be diluted with the standard calibrator matrix to estimate the minimum dilution requirement (MDR) at and above which the spike-recovery is acceptable. The spike-recovery test should then be repeated with the test samples diluted at the MDR. Note that this approach will increase the LLOQ for a less sensitive assay. If sensitivity is an issue, then other venues will be required to address the matrix effect problem. For example, the method can be modified to include sample clean-up, antibodies and/or assay conditions may be changed, or the study purpose may be tolerable to acknowledge that the method may not be selective for a few patients (whose data may require special interpretation). 

In general, an emulsion exhibits the characteristics of its external phase. Several methods are available for identifying the emulsion type. Dilution tests are based on the fact that the emulsion is only miscible with the liquid that forms its continuous phase. Conductivity measurements rely on the poor conductivity of oil compared with water, and give low values in w/o emulsions where oil is the continuous phase. Staining tests in which a water-soluble dye is sprinkled onto the surface of the emulsion also indicate the nature of the continuous phase. With an o/w emulsion there is rapid incorporation of the dye into the system whereas with the w/o emulsion the dye forms microscopically visible clumps. The reverse happens on addition of an oil-soluble dye. These tests essentially identify the continuous phase and do not indicate whether a multiple emulsion has been produced. This can be resolved by microscopy. 

Too high concentrations (activities) are indicated by an error report or by a maximal value. The samples must then be diluted further and the analysis repeated. Pressing the DIL button causes automatic multiplication in the instrument, but the prescribed dilution must always be employed by the user. Samples of very low concentration (activity) will also cause an error report. These samples must then be measured by a different method. 

Dilute solution properties in water are very important for water-soluble polymers [27], not only in their characterization but also in determining their performance under actual use conditions. These polymers include the acrylamide polymers, namely polyacrylamide and its structural variants, whose range of applications encompasses their use as soil modifiers. The results of calculations [28] of the specific refractive index increments of random copolymers of acrylamide with N-benzyl methacrylamide and with N-methyl methacrylamide are shown in Figure 8.3. (See Section 17.E for the method used to calculate the properties of random copolymers.) The details of the calculations (not shown) indicate that (a) the specific volumes of the homopolymers are in the order polyacrylamide < poly(N-benzyl methacrylamide) < poly(N-methyl methacrylamide), and (b) the refractive indices are in the order polyacrylamide poly(N-methyl methacrylamide) poly(N-benzyl methacrylamide). The results shown for the copolymers in Figure 8.3 arise from the multiplicative combination of these trends. 

---