Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Multiphase flows, types

These methods hardly take spatial distributions of velocity field and chemical species or transient phenomena into account, although most chemical reactors are operated in the turbulent regime and/or a multiphase flow mode. As a result, yield and selectivity of commercial chemical reactors often deviate from the values at their laboratory or pilot-scale prototypes. Scale-up of many chemical reactors, in particular the multiphase types, is still surrounded by a fame of mystery indeed. Another problem relates to the occurrence of thermal runaways due to hot spots as a result of poor local mixing effects. [Pg.209]

Many types of multiphase flow exist (i.e., gas-liquid, gas-solid, liquid-liquid, gas-liquid-solid) where within one type of flow several possible flow regimes exist. In Fig. 10 (Ishii, 1975) a classification is given for two-phase flow. [Pg.265]

For multiphase reactive systems of types (a) and (b), at least one of the reactants has to reach the reaction zone from a different phase. In such systems, generally mass transfer between these two different phases (and its interaction with chemical reactions) is of primary importance and turbulent mixing is often of secondary importance. For such systems, modeling multiphase flows as discussed in Chapter 4 is directly applicable. The only additional complexity is the possibility of interaction between mass transfer and chemical reactions. The typical interphase mass transfer source for component k between phases p and q can be written (for the complete species conservation equation, refer to Chapter 4) ... [Pg.144]

Flow in baffled stirred reactors has been modeled by employing several different approaches which can be classified into four types, and are shown schematically in Fig. 10.3. Most flow simulations of stirred vessels published before 1995 were based on steady-state analyses (reviewed by Ranade, 1995) using the black box approach. This approach requires boundary conditions (mean velocity and turbulence characteristics) on the impeller swept surface, which need to be determined experimentally. Although this approach is reasonably successful in predicting the flow characteristics in the bulk of the vessel, its usefulness is inherently limited by the availability of data. Extension of such an approach to multiphase flows and to industrial-scale reactors is not feasible because it is virtually impossible to obtain (from experiments) accurate... [Pg.290]

The list is merely suggestive. Complexity of reactive flows may greatly expand the list of issues on which further research is required. Another area which deserves mention here is modeling of inherently unsteady flows. Most flows in engineering equipment are unsteady (gas-liquid flow in a bubble column reactor, gas-solid flow in a riser reactor and so on). However, for most engineering purposes, all the details of these unsteady flows are not required to be known. Further work is necessary to evolve adequate representation of such flows within the CFD framework without resorting to full, unsteady simulations. This development is especially necessary to simulate inherently unsteady flows in large industrial reactors where full, unsteady simulations may require unaffordable resources (and therefore, may not be cost effective). Different reactor types and different classes of multiphase flows will have different research requirements based on current and future applications under consideration. [Pg.431]

In this section the application of multiphase flow theory to model the performance of fluidized bed reactors is outlined. A number of models for fluidized bed reactor flows have been established based on solving the average fundamental continuity, momentum and turbulent kinetic energy equations. The conventional granular flow theory for dense beds has been reviewed in chap 4. However, the majority of the papers published on this topic still focus on pure gas-particle flows, intending to develop closures that are able to predict the important flow phenomena observed analyzing experimental data. Very few attempts have been made to predict the performance of chemical reactive processes using this type of model. [Pg.915]

The main controlling parameters are relative permeabihty curves and types of microemulsion systems. Relative permeability curves control the multiphase flow, and the types of microemulsion systems dictate which relative permeability curves are sensitive. [Pg.370]


See other pages where Multiphase flows, types is mentioned: [Pg.181]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.941]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.588]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.2267]    [Pg.993]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.2250]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.25]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.86 ]




SEARCH



Flow types

Multiphase flows

Other Types of Multiphase Flows

Types of multiphase flows

© 2024 chempedia.info