Multilayer phase change

The L-type, would follow the Langmuir model, which is site adsorption without any lateral interaction between the adsorbate molecules. The concavity of the curve, in normal scale, is always directed toward the concentration axis. The S-type would follow a more complex model in which lateral interactions between molecules are to be taken into account, using, e.g., the Bragg-Williams approximation [15]. A concavity of the adsorption isotherm directed toward the y-axis is a very strong indication of lateral interactions between molecules. If one looks at the lUPAC classification of gas adsorption isotherms [1], the same remark holds this type of concavity is related with phenomena involving interactions between adsorbate molecules capillary condensation, multilayer formation, 2-D phase changes, etc. 

In the development of the subject, certain concepts stand out as milestones on the road to understanding. I suppose that we may take the recognition of the two types of adsorption, physical and chemical, respectively, as one of fundamental importance. In the development of the concept of physical adsorption, we find practical application in the direct measurement and evaluation of other methods for determining specific surfaces, the concept of surface phase changes with their concomitant critical constants, surface mobility, a more detailed consideration of all that is embraced in the term porosity, the transition from monolayers through islands to multilayers, and the various types of isotherms. 

Ueha proposed a two-vibration-mode coupled type (Fig. 4.1.38), that is, a torsional Langevin vibrator was combined with three multilayer actuators to generate larger longitudinal and transverse surface displacements of the stator, as well as to control their phase difference [62]. The phase change can change the rotation direction. 

In addition,subsequent to building,phase changes occur in many monomer multilayers to yield their normal crystal structures (9,10,11). 

As has been previously indicated the solid state polymerization of these monomer multilayers does not fit neatly into any of the three categories of topochemical effects. In all of the multilayers, discussed above, polymerization occurs with solid solution formation(9,10, 11,12). At low conversions there exists solid solutions of polymer side chains in the monomer structure, while at higher conversions there is a phase change to a solid solution of monomer side chains in the order-disorder... 

PVA and TaM -for the 88%-hydrolyzed PVA. The same dependence was found for the adsorbed layer thickness measured by viscosity and photon correlation spectroscopy. Extension of the adsorption isotherms to higher concentrations gave a second rise in surface concentration, which was attributed to multilayer adsorption and incipient phase separation at the interface. The latex particle size had no effect on the adsorption density however, the thickness of the adsorbed layer increased with increasing particle size, which was attributed to changes in the configuration of the adsorbed polymer molecules. The electrolyte stability of the bare and PVA-covered particles showed that the bare particles coagulated in the primary minimum and the PVA-covered particles flocculated in the secondary minimum and the larger particles were less stable than the smaller particles. 

The experiments discussed above were all carried out with total pressures below 10-4 Torr. However, Hori and Schmidt (187) have also reported non-stationary state experiments for total pressures of approximately 1 Torr in which the temperature of a Pt wire immersed in a CO—02 mixture was suddenly increased to a new value within a second. The rate of C02 production relaxed to a steady-state value characteristic of the higher temperature with three different characteristic relaxation times that are temperature dependent and vary between 3 and 100 seconds between 600 and 1500 K. The extremely long relaxation time compared with the inverse gas phase collision rate rule out an explanation based on changes within the chemisorption layer since this would require unreasonably small sticking coefficients or reaction probabilities of less than 10-6. The authors attribute the relaxation times to characteristic changes of surface multilayers composed of Pt, CO, and O. The effects are due to phases that are only formed at high pressures and, therefore, cannot be compared to the other experiments described here. 

---