Multicomponent distillation trays, minimum number

Example 8-25 Scheibel-Montross Minimum Reflux, 80 Minimum Number of Trays Total Reflux — Constant Volatility, 80 Chou and Yaws Method, 81 Example 8-26 Distillation with Two Sidestream Feeds, 82 Theoretical Trays at Operating Reflux, 83 Example 8-27 Operating Reflux Ratio, 84 Estimating Multicomponent Recoveries,... 

Multicomponent distillation, 393 absorption factor method, 398 azeotropic, 420-426 bubblepoint (BP) method, 406-409 computer program references. 404 concentration profiles, 394 distribution of non-kevs. 395 Edmister method, 398,399 extractive, 412, 417-422 feed tray location, 397 free variables, number of 395 Lewis-Matheson method 404 MESH eauations. 405-407 molecular, 425-427 nomenclature, 405 number of theoretical trays, 397 packed towers, 433-439 petroleum, 411-415 reflux, minimum, 397 reflux, operating, 397 SC (simultaneous correction) method, 408-411... 

If one or more unit operations have been given infeasible specifications, then the flowsheet will never converge. This problem also occurs with multicomponent distillation columns, particularly when purity specifications or flow rate specifications are used, or when nonadjacent key components are chosen. A quick manual mass balance around the column can usually determine whether the specifications are feasible. Remember that all the components in the feed must exit the column somewhere. The use of recovery specifications is usually more robust, but care is still needed to make sure that the reflux ratio and number of trays are greater than the minimum required. A similar problem is encountered in recycle loops if a component accumulates because of the separation specifications that have been set. Adding a purge stream usually solves this problem. 

---