MOPAC method

Tl le popularity of the MNDO, AMI and PM3 methods is due in large part to their implementation i n the MOPAC and AMP AC programs. The programs are able to perform many kinds of calculation and to calculate many different properties. 

A valuable review of the MOPAC program and the semi-empirical methods MNDO, MINDO/3, AMI, and PM3. Of particular use are theoretical discussions of these semi-empirical methods and many tables validating the accuracy of the MOPAC program and its associated Hamiltonians. 

Semi-empirical methods, such as AMI, MINDO/3 and PM3, implemented in programs like MOPAC, AMPAC, HyperChem, and Gaussian, use parameters derived from experimental data to simplify the computation. They solve an approximate form of the Schrodinger equation that depends on having appropriate parameters available for the type of chemical system under investigation. Different semi-emipirical methods are largely characterized by their differing parameter sets. 

Semi-empirical methods are characterized by their use of parameters derived from experimental data in order to simplify the approximation to the Schrbdinger equation. As such, they are relatively inexpensive and can be practically applied to very, very large molecules. There are a variety of semi-empirical methods. Among the best known are AMI, PM3 and MNDO. Gaussian includes a variety of semi-empirical models, and they are also the central focus or present in many other programs including AMPAC, MOPAC, HyperChem and Spartan. 

Semi-empirical methods, such as those implemented in the MOPAC [9] program, simplify the equations considerably by neglecting many terms, but then compensate for this by parameterising some of them so that the calculations reproduce experimental information on, for example, the heat of formation. Once the various approximations are made, the molecular properties to which the parameters are fitted, and the molecules used in the fitting, define a model Hamiltonian, of which the most commonly used are the AMI and the PM3 Hamiltonians found in MOPAC. A major advantage of semi-empirical methods is... 

CAChe 5.0, available in 2002, includes a new, more powerful, semiempirical method that uses the PM5 Hamiltonian, a MOPAC 2002 offering, modeling of molecules with up to 20,000 atoms, the inclusion of all main group elements in one semiempirical method, and using MOPAC AMl-d, supports the transition metals Pt, Fe, Cu, Ag, Mo, V, and Pd. Researchers can now import and display, in 3D, proteins from the Protein Data Bank (PDB), optimize proteins, dock ligands, and model reactions on protein molecules. 

MOPAC is a general-purpose semiempirical molecular orbital program for the study of chemical structures and reactions. It is available in desktop PC running Windows, Macintosh OS, and Unix-based workstation versions. It uses semiempirical quantum mechanical methods that are based on Hartree-Fock (HF) theory with some parameterized functions and empirically determined parameters replacing some sections of the complete HF treatment. The approximations in... 

Bondi s calculation method is simple. The van der Waals volumes are the sum of the van der Waals volumes of fragments, as given in Table 6.3. The calculated van der Waals volumes are summarized in Table 6.4. However, these volumes are different from those calculated using the MOPAC-BlogP program, even though the correlation is excellent. 

The current status of the semiempirical methods pioneered by Michael J. S. Dewar is given. These methods are made available to non—theoreticians through the programs MOP AC and AMPAC. Some capabilities of MOPAC and the form of the data input to the program are outlined. 

A knowledge of the accuracy, strong points, and weak points, of each method is necessary in order to efficiently carry out computational chemistry research. We will first look at a summary of the three most accurate methods in MOPAC, and then at their strengths and weaknesses. 

---