Monomer reactivity ratio cationic chain copolymerization

For any specific type of initiation (i.e., radical, cationic, or anionic) the monomer reactivity ratios and therefore the copolymer composition equation are independent of many reaction parameters. Since termination and initiation rate constants are not involved, the copolymer composition is independent of differences in the rates of initiation and termination or of the absence or presence of inhibitors or chain-transfer agents. Under a wide range of conditions the copolymer composition is independent of the degree of polymerization. The only limitation on this generalization is that the copolymer be a high polymer. Further, the particular initiation system used in a radical copolymerization has no effect on copolymer composition. The same copolymer composition is obtained irrespective of whether initiation occurs by the thermal homolysis of initiators such as AIBN or peroxides, redox, photolysis, or radiolysis. Solvent effects on copolymer composition are found in some radical copolymerizations (Sec. 6-3a). Ionic copolymerizations usually show significant effects of solvent as well as counterion on copolymer composition (Sec. 6-4). 

We condude this section by stating that the field-accelerating effect on copolymerizations and the change of the monomer reactivity ratio with the field can be accounted for in terms of the interpretation proposed for cationic homopolymerizations, namely the field-facilitated dissociation of the growing chain ends. We should note that the observed field influence on the copolymerization excludes the possibility of the electroinitiated polymerization mechanism. 

Table III shows the increase of molecular weight of BCMO polymerization with conversion, although the polymer tends to precipitate. The monomer reactivity ratios of DOL-BCMO copolymerization were previously determined as rx (DOL) = 0.65 0.05, r2 (BCMO) = 1.5 0.1 at 0°C. by BF3 Et20 (8). Table IV shows a preparation of block copolymer of DOL, St, and BCMO. In the first step we polymerized DOL and St in the second step we added BCMO to this living system. The copolymer obtained showed an increase of molecular weight, and considerable BCMO was incorporated in the copolymer still remaining soluble in ethylene dichloride. The solubility behavior together with the increase of molecular weight with addition of BCMO shows that this polymer consists of block sequences of DOL-St and (St)-DOL-BCMO. This we call block and random copolymer of DOL-St—BCMO. We can deny the presence of BCMO, St, or DOL homopolymers in this system, but some chain-breaking reactions are unavoidable, leading to copolymer mixtures. Thus, the principle of formation of block copolymers by cationic system is partly substantiated.

VEs do not readily enter into copolymerization by simple cationic polymerization techniques instead, they can be mixed randomly or in blocks with the aid of living polymerization methods. This is on account of the differences in reactivity, resulting in significant rate differentials. Consequendy, reactivity ratios must be taken into account if random copolymers, instead of mixtures of homopolymers, are to be obtained by standard cationic polymeriza tion (50,51). Table 5 illustrates this situation for butyl vinyl ether (BVE) copolymerized with other VEs. The rate constants of polymerization (kp) can differ by one or two orders of magnitude, resulting in homopolymerization of each monomer or incorporation of the faster monomer, followed by the slower (assuming no chain transfer). 

In the copolymerization of trioxane with dioxolane, reactivity ratios of dissolved copolymer cations are quite different from those of active centers in the crystalline phase. The former strongly prefer addition of dioxolane. The difference in reactivity ratios between dissolved and precipitated active centers is attributed to the fact that in the solid phase, polymerization and crystallization of the copolymer are simultaneous. The cationic chain ends are assumed to be directly on the crystal surface. Determination of the equilibrium concentrations of formaldehyde confirms this conclusion dissolved copolymer has a higher tendency to cleave formaldehyde than crystalline polyoxymethylene. In the latter stages of copolymerization the soluble copolymer is degraded gradually to the dioxolane monomer which is incorporated into the crystalline copolymer in an almost random distribution. 

The reactivity ratios for pairs of given monomers can be very different for the different types of chain-growth copolymerization free-radical, anionic, cationic, and coordination copolymerization. Although the copolymer equation is valid for each of them, the copolymer composition can depend strongly on the mode of initiation (see Figure 10.8). 

The hrst section covers the basic principles and characteristics necessary for polymer preparation by polymerization, being either (a) stepwise polymerization of bifunctional monomers by polycondensation, stepwise polyaddition and ringopening processes, or (b) chain polymerization of vinyl monomers by free radical, cationic, anionic, and coordination addition processes. Both of these polymerization techniques are used for polymer preparation from monomer. The goal of the polymerization technique is to obtain polymers with specific structures and properties -this generally requires specialized polymerization conditions. Also described are the factors affecting the rates of homo- and copolymerizations and the reactivity ratios of different comonomers. 

Normally reactivity ratios lie between 0 and 1 (Table 2.9) and so there is usually a tendency toward alternation in most copolymerization reactions. It is found that for the same pair of monomer molecules the reactivity ratios can differ greatly depending upon the nature of the chain carrier used (i.e. free radical, cationic or anionic). Obviously the rate constants fcii, k 2, ki2 and k2 will be affected in different ways by the nature of the active centre and it is found that the relative reactivity of different monomers can be correlated with resonance stability, polarity and steric effects. Such correlations are beyond the scope of this book and the reader is directed towards more advanced texts. 

---