Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Moller-Plesset, second-order computation

The more recent 1992 Maslen et al. force field for benzene (153) was computed by evaluating analytic derivatives through quartic terms at the SCF level. The DZP basis set was used in these studies. The derivatives were evaluated at the equilibrium geometry determined at the MP2 (Moller-Plesset second-order pertubation theory) level using a larger basis set, TZ2P (triple-zeta plus double polarization). It is significant that a complete ab initio force field at the quartic level has been computed for benzene. [Pg.104]

Watts, J. D., and M. Dupuis. Parallel computation of the Moller-Plesset second-order contribution to the electronic correlation energy. /. Comp. Chem. 9 158-170, 1988. [Pg.13]

Moller-Plesset second-order perturbation theory (MP2) is a common method used in computational chemistry to include electron correlation as an extension to Hartree-Fock (HF) theory which neglects Coulomb correlation and thus also misses all dispersion effects. The perturbation is the difference between the Fock-operator and the exact electronic Hamiltonian. [Pg.449]

A fundamental characteristic of the FPA is the dual extrapolation to the one-and n-particle electronic-structure limits. The process leading to these limits can be described as follows (a) use families of basis sets, such as the correlation-consistent (aug-)cc-p(wC)VnZ sets [51,52], which systematically approach completeness through an increase in the cardinal number n (b) apply lower levels of theory with extended [53] basis sets (typically direct Hartree-Fock (HF) [54] and second-order Moller-Plesset (MP2) [55] computations) (c) use higher-order valence correlation treatments [CCSD(T), CCSDTQ(P), even FCI] [5,56] with the largest possible basis sets and (d) lay out a two-dimensional extrapolation grid based on the assumed additivity of correlation increments followed by suitable extrapolations. FPA assumes that the higher-order correlation increments show diminishing basis set dependence. Focal-point [2,49,50,57-62] and numerous other theoretical studies have shown that even in systems without particularly heavy elements, account must also be taken for core correlation and relativistic phenomena, as well as for (partial) breakdown of the BO approximation, i.e., inclusion of the DBOC correction [28-33]. [Pg.160]

Correlation can be added as a perturbation from the Hartree-Fock wave function. This is called Moller-Plesset perturbation theory. In mapping the HF wave function onto a perturbation theory formulation, HF becomes a hrst-order perturbation. Thus, a minimal amount of correlation is added by using the second-order MP2 method. Third-order (MP3) and fourth-order (MP4) calculations are also common. The accuracy of an MP4 calculation is roughly equivalent to the accuracy of a CISD calculation. MP5 and higher calculations are seldom done due to the high computational cost (A time complexity or worse). [Pg.22]

CC) methods, which have largely superseded Cl methods, in the limit can also be used to give exact solutions but again with same prohibitive cost as full Cl. As with Cl, CC methods are often truncated, most commonly to CCSD (N cost), but as before these can still only be applied to systems of modest size. Finally, Moller-Plesset (MP) perturbation theory, which is usually used to second order (MP2 has a cost), is more computationally accessible but does not provide as robust results. [Pg.28]

Under some simplifications associated with the symmetry of fullerenes, it has been possible to perform calculations of type Hartree-Fock in which the interelec-tronic correlation has been included up to second order Mpller-Plesset (Moller et al. 1934 Purcell 1979 Cioslowski 1995), and calculations based on the density functional (Pople et al. 1976). However, given the difficulties faced by ab initio computations when all the electrons of these large molecules are taken into account, other semiempirical methods of the Hiickel type or tight-binding (Haddon 1992) models have been developed to determine the electronic structure of C60 (Cioslowski 1995 Lin and Nori 1996) and associated properties like polarizabilities (Bonin and Kresin 1997 Rubio et al. 1993) hyperpolarizabilities (Fanti et al. 1995) plasmon excitations (Bertsch et al. 1991) etc. These semiempirical models reproduce the order of monoelectronic levels close to the Fermi level. Other more sophisticated semiempirical models, like the PPP (Pariser-Parr-Pople) (Pariser and Parr 1953 Pople 1953) obtain better quantitative results when compared with photoemission experiments (Savage 1975). [Pg.5]

Intramolecular nucleophilic substitution to form thiiranes was studied by means of ab initio MO computations based on the 6-31G basis set <1997JCC1773>. Systems studied included the anions SCH2CH2F and CH2C(=S)CH2F which would afford thiirane and 2-methylenethiirane, respectively (Equations Z and 3). It was important to include electron correlation which was done with the frozen-core approximation at the second-order Moller-Plesset perturbation level. Optimized structures were confirmed by means of vibrational frequency calculations. The main conclusions were that electron correlation is important in lowering AG and AG°, that the displacements are enthalpy controlled, and that reaction energies are strongly dependent on reactant stabilities. [Pg.304]

Second-order Moller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) is the computationally least expensive and most popular ab initio electron correlation method [4,15]. Except for transition metal compounds, MP2 equilibrium geometries are of comparable accuracy to DFT. However, MP2 captures long-range correlation effects (like dispersion) which are lacking in present-day density functionals. The computational cost of MP2 calculations is dominated by the integral transformation from the atomic orbital (AO) to the molecular orbital (MO) basis which scales as 0(N5) with the system size. This four-index transformation can be avoided by introduction of the RI integral approximation which requires just the transformation of three-index quantities and reduces the prefactor without significant loss in accuracy [36,37]. This makes RI-MP2 the most efficient alternative for small- to medium-sized molecular systems for which DFT fails. [Pg.31]


See other pages where Moller-Plesset, second-order computation is mentioned: [Pg.105]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.647]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.734]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.551]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.208]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.28 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.28 ]




SEARCH



Moller

Moller second-order

Moller-Plesset

Moller-Plesset second-order

© 2024 chempedia.info