Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Molecular systems description

The last idea has a huge importance for the molecular systems description this because the partitioning (2.99) even by producing a problem... [Pg.143]

As mentioned above, the correct description of the nuclei in a molecular system is a delocalized quantum wavepacket that evolves according to the Schrbdinger equation. In the classical limit of the single surface (adiabatic) case, when effectively 0, the evolution of the wavepacket density... [Pg.252]

The adiabatic picture developed above, based on the BO approximation, is basic to our understanding of much of chemistry and molecular physics. For example, in spectroscopy the adiabatic picture is one of well-defined spectral bands, one for each electronic state. The smicture of each band is then due to the shape of the molecule and the nuclear motions allowed by the potential surface. This is in general what is seen in absorption and photoelectron spectroscopy. There are, however, occasions when the picture breaks down, and non-adiabatic effects must be included to give a faithful description of a molecular system [160-163]. [Pg.276]

The principal idea behind the CSP approach is to use input from Classical Molecular Dynamics simulations, carried out for the process of interest as a first preliminary step, in order to simplify a quantum mechanical calculation, implemented in a subsequent, second step. This takes advantage of the fact that classical dynamics offers a reasonable description of many properties of molecular systems, in particular of average quantities. More specifically, the method uses classical MD simulations in order to determine effective... [Pg.367]

The Extended Iliickel method also allows the inclusion ofd orbitals for third row elements (specifically, Si. P, Sand CD in the basis set. Since there arc more atomic orbitals, choosing this option resn Its in a Ion ger calc ii 1 at ion. Th e m ajor reason to in cin de d orbitals is to improve the description of the molecular system. [Pg.118]

Electrostatics is the study of interactions between charged objects. Electrostatics alone will not described molecular systems, but it is very important to the understanding of interactions of electrons, which is described by a wave function or electron density. The central pillar of electrostatics is Coulombs law, which is the mathematical description of how like charges repel and unlike charges attract. The Coulombs law equations for energy and the force of interaction between two particles with charges q and q2 at a distance rn are... [Pg.8]

A Hamiltonian is the quantum mechanical description of an energy contribution. The exact Hamiltonian for a molecular system is ... [Pg.162]

Early in the twentieth century physicists established that molecules are composed of positively charged nuclei and negatively charged electrons. Given their tiny size and nonclassical behavior, exemplified by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, it is remarkable (at least to me) that Eq. (1) can be considered exact as a description of the electrostatic forces acting between the atomic nuclei and electrons making up molecules and molecular systems. Eor those readers who are skeptical, and perhaps you should be skeptical of such a claim, I recommend the very readable introduction to Jackson s electrodynamics book [1]. [Pg.95]

An important question is whether one can rigorously express such an average without referring explicitly to the solvent degrees of freedom. In other words. Is it possible to avoid explicit reference to the solvent in the mathematical description of the molecular system and still obtain rigorously correct properties The answer to this question is yes. A reduced probability distribution P(X) that depends only on the solute configuration can be defined as... [Pg.136]

Semi-empirical and ab initio methods differ in the trade-off made between computational cost and accuracy of result. Semi-empirical calculations are relatively inexpensive and provide reasonable qualitative descriptions of molecular systems and fairly accurate quantitative predictions of energies and structures for systems where good parameter sets exist. [Pg.6]

It is well established that GGA gives a better description of molecular systems, crystal surfaces and surface-molecule interactions. However, there are cases where the GGA results for solids are in much worse agreement with experiment than the LDA ones (e.g., 3-22 jj has been suggested that the effect of using GGA for solids is roughly equivalent to adding uniform tensile stress, and as a result lattice constants are frequently overestimated. [Pg.22]

These limitations, most urgently felt in solid state theory, have stimulated the search for alternative approaches to the many-body problem of an interacting electron system as found in solids, surfaces, interfaces, and molecular systems. Today, local density functional (LDF) theory (3-4) and its generalization to spin polarized systems (5-6) are known to provide accurate descriptions of the electronic and magnetic structures as well as other ground state properties such as bond distances and force constants in bulk solids and surfaces. [Pg.50]

The n molecular orbitals described so far involve two atoms, so the orbital pictures look the same for the localized bonding model applied to ethylene and the MO approach applied to molecular oxygen. In the organic molecules described in the introduction to this chapter, however, orbitals spread over three or more atoms. Such delocalized n orbitals can form when more than two p orbitals overlap in the appropriate geometry. In this section, we develop a molecular orbital description for three-atom n systems. In the following sections, we apply the results to larger molecules. [Pg.706]

The aim of the present article is to present a qualitative deseription of the optimised orbitals of molecular systems i.e. of the orbitals resulting from SCF calculations or from MCSCF calculations involving a valence Cl we do not present here a new formal development (although some formalism is necessary), nor a new computational method, nor an actual calculation of an observable quantity. .. but merely the description of the orbitals. [Pg.19]

This statement will be referred to here as the Valley theorem.lt constitutes the formal basis of our description of the optimum orbitals in molecular systems. [Pg.21]

We arrive now at the main purpose of the present work to find a qualitative description of the optimum orbitals (obtained by SCF or MCSCF calculations) of molecular systems. [Pg.27]

T-ZAlfA) appears in the eq.(lO) multiplied by < i i > when natural orbitals are used. Thus, if < i i > is small (< i i >very small volume around the nucleus of A. In the remaining part of the volume occupied by the molecular system the description of this orbital cannot be deduced from the Valley theorem. Therefore, we will consider here only strongly occupied orbitals with < > 1 or < i i > 2. [Pg.28]

This description results from the fact that the optimum orbitals are essentially determined in the region surrounding each atom by the compensation between the kinetic energy T of the electron and the Coulomb attraction of the electron by the nucleus of that atom. This compensation implies that the orbital is very weakly dependent of the environment of the atom in the molecular system so that it is essentially determined by atomic conditions (Valley theorem). [Pg.36]

We have checked, using as a test case, that the description of the optimum orbital of the molecular system is then complete in the sense that it allows (assuming that the orbital energy is known) to construct by a fit process an optimum orbital which is very close to the one obtained by a diagonalisation process in a gaussian basis. [Pg.36]

The main handicap of MD is the knowledge of the function [/( ). There are some systems where reliable approximations to the true (7( r, ) are available. This is, for example, the case of ionic oxides. (7( rJ) is in such a case made of coulombic (pairwise) interactions and short-range terms. A second example is a closed-shell molecular system. In this case the interaction potentials are separated into intraatomic and interatomic parts. A third type of physical system for which suitable approaches to [/( r, ) exist are the transition metals and their alloys. To this class of models belong the glue model and the embedded atom method. Systems where chemical bonds of molecules are broken or created are much more difficult to describe, since the only way to get a proper description of a reaction all the way between reactant and products would be to solve the quantum-mechanical problem at each step of the reaction. [Pg.663]


See other pages where Molecular systems description is mentioned: [Pg.120]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.1179]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.706]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.25]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.106 ]




SEARCH



Molecular description

System description

© 2024 chempedia.info