Molecular Structure Using Valence Bond Concepts

Description of Molecular Structure Using Valence Bond Concepts 

These structural formulas were developed without detailed understanding of the nature of the chemical bond that is represented by the lines in the formulas. There was a key advance in the understanding of the origin of chemical bonds in 1916, when 

---

Several methods of quantitative description of molecular structure based on the concepts of valence bond theory have been developed. These methods employ orbitals similar to localized valence bond orbitals, but permitting modest delocalization. These orbitals allow many fewer structures to be considered and remove the need for incorporating many ionic structures, in agreement with chemical intuition. To date, these methods have not been as widely applied in organic chemistry as MO calculations. They have, however, been successfully applied to fundamental structural issues. For example, successful quantitative treatments of the structure and energy of benzene and its heterocyclic analogs have been developed. It remains to be seen whether computations based on DFT and modem valence bond theory will come to rival the widely used MO programs in analysis and interpretation of stmcture and reactivity. 

In Chapter 7, we used valence bond theory to explain bonding in molecules. It accounts, at least qualitatively, for the stability of the covalent bond in terms of the overlap of atomic orbitals. By invoking hybridization, valence bond theory can account for the molecular geometries predicted by electron-pair repulsion. Where Lewis structures are inadequate, as in S02, the concept of resonance allows us to explain the observed properties. 

Abstract The wave function of Coulson and Fischer is examined within the context of recent developments in quantum chemistry. It is argued that the Coulson-Fischer ansatz establishes a third way in quantum chemistry, which should not be confused with the traditional molecular orbital and valence bond formalisms. The Coulson-Fischer theory is compared with modern valence bond approaches and also modern multireference correlation methods. Because of the non-orthogonality problem which arises when wave functions are constructed from arbitrary orbital products, the application of the Coulson-Fischer method to larger molecules necessitates the introduction of approximation schemes. It is shown that the use of hierarchical orthogonality restrictions has advantages, combining a picture of molecular electronic structure which is an accord with simple, but nevertheless empirical, ideas and concepts, with a level of computational complexity which renders praetieal applications to larger molecules tractable. An open collaborative virtual environment is proposed to foster further development. 

The simplest molecular orbital method to use, and the one involving the most drastic approximations and assumptions, is the Huckel method. One str ength of the Huckel method is that it provides a semiquantitative theoretical treatment of ground-state energies, bond orders, electron densities, and free valences that appeals to the pictorial sense of molecular structure and reactive affinity that most chemists use in their everyday work. Although one rarely sees Huckel calculations in the resear ch literature anymore, they introduce the reader to many of the concepts and much of the nomenclature used in more rigorous molecular orbital calculations. 

Resonance theory [15] contains essentially three assumptions beyond those of the valence bond method. Perhaps the most serious assumption is the contention that only unexcited canonical forms, non-polar valence bond structures or classical structures need be considered. Less serious, but no more than intuitive, is the proposition that the molecular geometry will take on that expected for the average of the classical structures. This is extended to the measurement of stability being greater the greater the number of classical structures. These concepts are still widely used in chemistry in very qualitative ways. 

We have used the concepts of the resonance methods many times in previous chapters to explain the chemical behavior of compounds and to describe the structures of compounds that cannot be represented satisfactorily by a single valence-bond structure (e.g., benzene, Section 6-5). We shall assume, therefore, that you are familiar with the qualitative ideas of resonance theory, and that you are aware that the so-called resonance and valence-bond methods are in fact synonymous. The further treatment given here emphasizes more directly the quantum-mechanical nature of valence-bond theory. The basis of molecular-orbital theory also is described and compared with valence-bond theory. First, however, we shall discuss general characteristics of simple covalent bonds that we would expect either theory to explain. 

Most chemists still tend to think about the structure and reactivity of atomic and molecular species in qualitative terms that are related to electron pairs and to unpaired electrons. Concepts utilizing these terms such as, for example, the Lewis theory of valence, have had and still have a considerable impact on many areas of chemistry. They are particularly useful when it is necessary to highlight the qualitative similarities between the structure and reactivity of molecules containing identical functional groups, or within a homologous series. Many organic chemistry textbooks continue to use full and half-arrows to indicate the supposed movement of electron pairs or single electrons in the description of reaction mechanisms. Such concepts are closely related to classical valence-bond (VB) theory which, however, is unable to compete with advanced molecular orbital (MO) approaches in the accurate calculation of the quantitative features of the potential surface associated with a chemical reaction. 

---