Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Molecular orbital theory parameter

Substituent effects as evaluated on the basis of the Hammett equation and its extended forms, are - this has to be emphasized again — empirical results. Nevertheless, it is very soothing to know that theoretical approaches, i. e., calculations of substituent effects using ab initio molecular orbital theory (Topsom, 1976, 1981, 1983 Taft and Topsom, 1987, STO-3G and 4-31G level), give results that are consistent with the experimental data. However, it is not recommended to use only theoretically calculated substituent constants and values for F, R, and other parameters for the interpretation of experimental data. [Pg.150]

These relations highlight the fact that the formalism of DFT-based chemical reactivity built by Parr and coworkers, captures the essence of the pre DFT formulation of reactivity under frontier molecular orbital theory (FMO). Berkowitz showed that similar to FMO, DFT could also explain the orientation or stereoselectivity of a reaction [12]. In addition, DFT-based reactivity parameters are augmented by more global terms expressed in the softness. [Pg.166]

The g-values and A values of Table IV reveal that the particular layer silicate has more effect on ESR parameters of adsorbed Cu " - than saturation of exchange sites with different cations such as Na+ and Ca +. Also, the smectites as a group have lower g and higher A values than vermiculite. From the perspective of molecular orbital theory, low g and high A values correspond to more covalent bonds between Cu + and the ligand (19). Thus,... [Pg.386]

The application of ab initio molecular orbital theory to suitable model systems has led to theoretical scales of substituent parameters, which may be compared with the experimental scales. Calculations (3-21G or 4-31G level) of energies or electron populations were made by Marriott and Topsom in 1984164. The results are well correlated with op (i.e. 07) for a small number of substituents whose op values on the various experimental scales (gas phase, non-polar solvents, polar solvents) are concordant. The nitro group is considered to be one of these, with values 0.65 in the gas phase, 0.65 in non-polar solvents and 0.67 in polar solvents. The regression equations are the basis of theoretical op values for about fifty substituents. The nitro group is well behaved and the derived theoretical value of op is 0.66. [Pg.506]

Topsom, 1976) and to treat them separately. In this review we will be concerned solely with polar or electronic substituent effects. Although it is possible to define a number of different electronic effects (field effects, CT-inductive effects, jt-inductive effects, Jt-field effects, resonance effects), it is customary to use a dual substituent parameter scale, in which one parameter describes the polarity of a substituent and the other the charge transfer (resonance) (Topsom, 1976). In terms of molecular orbital theory, particularly in the form of perturbation theory, this corresponds to a separate evaluation of charge (inductive) and overlap (resonance) effects. This is reflected in the Klopman-Salem theory (Devaquet and Salem, 1969 Klop-man, 1968 Salem, 1968) and in our theory (Sustmann and Binsch, 1971, 1972 Sustmann and Vahrenholt, 1973). A related treatment of substituent effects has been proposed by Godfrey (Duerden and Godfrey, 1980). [Pg.132]

Resonance integrals of bonds between atoms X and Y, XY, are expressed as defined in Eq. (2), where kXY depends on the bond length. There has been considerable variation in the values taken for the Coulomb and resonance integrals for heterocyclic molecules. One of the best available set of parameters is still that originally suggested by A. Streitwieser (Molecular orbital theory. J. Wiley Sons, Inc., N.Y.-L., 1961) ... [Pg.21]

Hiickel and extended Huckel methods are termed semi-empirical because they rely on experimental data for the quantification of parameters. There are other semi-empirical methods, such as CNDO, MINDO, INDO, in which experimental data are still used, but more care is taken in evaluating the Htj. These methods are self-consistent field procedures based on 3 SCF. They are discussed in various works on molecular orbital theory.4... [Pg.56]

Semiempirical molecular orbital methods23-25 incorporate parameters derived from experimental data into molecular orbital theory to reduce the time-consuming calculation of two-electron integrals and correlation effects. Examples of semiempirical molecular orbital methods include Dewar s AMI, MNDO, and MINDO/3. Of the three quantum chemical types, the semiempirical molecular orbital methods are the least sophisticated and thus require the least amount of computational resources. However, these methods can be reasonably accurate for molecules with standard bond types. [Pg.154]

However, in sulphides and related minerals, the effects of covalent bonding predominate and orbital overlap must be taken into account. Thus, concepts of molecular orbital theory are described in chapter 11 and applied to aspects of the sulfide mineralogy of transition elements. Examples of computed energy diagrams for molecular clusters are also presented in chapter 11. There, it is noted that the fundamental 3d orbital energy splitting parameter of crystal field theory, A, receives a similar interpretation in the molecular orbital theory. [Pg.5]

Lykos, P. G. The parameters used in semiempirical molecular orbital theory for conjugated hydrocarbons. J. Chem. Phys. 35, 1249 (1961). [Pg.56]

A useful development has been the hybridization of molecular orbital theory and density functional theory.46 The latter uses a relatively simple equation to estimate the electron correlation as a function of the electronic density. With the electronic density described by the basis sets discussed above, a quicker approximation for electron correlation can be attained. There are numerous exchange and correlation functional pairs, but a commonly used set is the Becke 3-parameter exchange functional and the Lee-Yang-Parr correlation functional.47-43 This approximation for electron exchange and correlation is simply designated B3LYP in Gaussian 98 46... [Pg.129]

Some of the first applications of molecular-orbital theory in mass spectrometry were in calculations of ionization potentials of n-alkanes (see Streitwieser, 1961, for leading references). Strictly, these ionization potentials are a property of both the molecule and the ion produced, but often the effect of electron correlation in the ion is ignored (Koopmans, 1933) and resort is then made to adjustment of parameters to give good agreement between theory and practice. In the absence of experimental confirmation, such calculations must be viewed cautiously. [Pg.255]

Gonzalez-Lafont, A. Truong, T. N. Truhlar, D. G. Direct dynamics calculations with neglect of diatomic differential overlap molecular orbital theory with specific reaction parameters, J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95,4618-4627. [Pg.562]


See other pages where Molecular orbital theory parameter is mentioned: [Pg.12]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.113]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.5 ]




SEARCH



Molecular Orbitals Theory

Molecular orbit theory

Molecular orbital parameters

Molecular orbital theory

Molecular parameters

Orbital parameters

© 2024 chempedia.info