Molecular orbital model, wave function

Combination of n atomic orbitals (mathematically adding and subtracting wave functions) forms a set of n molecular orbitals (new wave functions) that is, the number of molecular orbitals formed is equal to the number of atomic orbitals combined. When only MO theory is used to model bonding in organic compounds the molecular orbitals are spread over all atoms in a molecule or ion whose atomic orbitals are properly aligned to overlap with one another. 

Valence bond and molecular orbital theory both incorporate the wave description of an atom s electrons into this picture of H2 but m somewhat different ways Both assume that electron waves behave like more familiar waves such as sound and light waves One important property of waves is called interference m physics Constructive interference occurs when two waves combine so as to reinforce each other (m phase) destructive interference occurs when they oppose each other (out of phase) (Figure 2 2) Recall from Section 1 1 that electron waves m atoms are characterized by their wave function which is the same as an orbital For an electron m the most stable state of a hydrogen atom for example this state is defined by the Is wave function and is often called the Is orbital The valence bond model bases the connection between two atoms on the overlap between half filled orbifals of fhe fwo afoms The molecular orbital model assembles a sef of molecular orbifals by combining fhe afomic orbifals of all of fhe atoms m fhe molecule... 

Several other molecular orbital models have been applied to the analysis of VCD spectra, primarily using CNDO wave functions. The nonlocalized molecular orbital model (NMO) is the MO analog of the charge flow models, based on atomic contributions to the dipole moment derivative (38). Currents are restricted to lie along bonds. An additional electronic term is introduced in the MO model that corresponds to s-p rehybridization effects during vibrational motion. 

The valence bond and molecular orbital theories differ in how they use the orbitals of two hydrogen atoms to describe the orbital that contains the electron pair in H2. Both theories assume that electron waves behave much like more familiar waves, such as sound and light waves. One property of waves that is important here is called interference in physics. Constructive interference occurs when two waves combine so as to reinforce each other ( in phase ) destructive interference occurs when they oppose each other ( out of phase ) (Figure 1.15). In the valence bond model constructive interference between two electron waves is seen as the basis for the shared electron-pair bond. In the molecular orbital model, the wave functions of molecules are derived by combining wave functions of atoms. 

Molecular orbitals are not unique. The same exact wave function could be expressed an infinite number of ways with different, but equivalent orbitals. Two commonly used sets of orbitals are localized orbitals and symmetry-adapted orbitals (also called canonical orbitals). Localized orbitals are sometimes used because they look very much like a chemist s qualitative models of molecular bonds, lone-pair electrons, core electrons, and the like. Symmetry-adapted orbitals are more commonly used because they allow the calculation to be executed much more quickly for high-symmetry molecules. Localized orbitals can give the fastest calculations for very large molecules without symmetry due to many long-distance interactions becoming negligible. 

It is important to realize that whenever qualitative or frontier molecular orbital theory is invoked, the description is within the orbital (Hartree-Fock or Density Functional) model for the electronic wave function. In other words, rationalizing a trend in computational results by qualitative MO theory is only valid if the effect is present at the HF or DFT level. If the majority of the variation is due to electron correlation, an explanation in terms of interacting orbitals is not appropriate. 

Because electrons have wave-like properties, orbital interactions involve similar addition or subtraction of wave functions. When two orbitals are superimposed, one result is a new orbital that is a composite of the originals, as shown for molecular hydrogen in Figure 10-2. This interaction is called orbital overlap, and it is the foundation of the bonding models described in this chapter. 

It is a truism that in the past decade density functional theory has made its way from a peripheral position in quantum chemistry to center stage. Of course the often excellent accuracy of the DFT based methods has provided the primary driving force of this development. When one adds to this the computational economy of the calculations, the choice for DFT appears natural and practical. So DFT has conquered the rational minds of the quantum chemists and computational chemists, but has it also won their hearts To many, the success of DFT appeared somewhat miraculous, and maybe even unjust and unjustified. Unjust in view of the easy achievement of accuracy that was so hard to come by in the wave function based methods. And unjustified it appeared to those who doubted the soundness of the theoretical foundations. There has been misunderstanding concerning the status of the one-determinantal approach of Kohn and Sham, which superficially appeared to preclude the incorporation of correlation effects. There has been uneasiness about the molecular orbitals of the Kohn-Sham model, which chemists used qualitatively as they always have used orbitals but which in the physics literature were sometimes denoted as mathematical constructs devoid of physical (let alone chemical) meaning. 

How well can continuum solvation models distinguish changes in one or another of these solvent properties This is illustrated in Table 2, which compares solvation energies for three representative solutes in eight test solvents. Three of the test solvents are those shown in Table 1, one is water, and the other four were selected to provide useful comparisons on the basis of their solvent descriptors, which are shown in Table 3. Notice that all four solvents in Table 3 have no acidity, which makes them more suitable, in this respect, than 1-octanol or chloroform for modeling biomembranes. Table 2 shows that the SM5.2R model, with gas-phase geometries and semiempirical molecular orbital theory for the wave function, does very well indeed in reproducing all the trends in the data. 

Although the MEG model is essentially ionic in nature, it may also be used to evaluate interactions in partially covalent compounds by appropriate choices of the wave functions representing interacting species. This has been exemplified by Tossell (1985) in a comparative study in which MEG treatment was coupled with an ab initio Self Consistent Field-Molecular Orbital procedure. In this way, Tossell (1985) evaluated the interaction of C03 with Mg in magnesite (MgC03). Representing the ion by a 4-31G wave function, holding its... 

---