Molecular internal space mechanism

The devolatilization of a component in an internal mixer can be described by a model based on the penetration theory [27,28]. The main characteristic of this model is the separation of the bulk of material into two parts A layer periodically wiped onto the wall of the mixing chamber, and a pool of material rotating in front of the rotor flights, as shown in Figure 29.15. This flow pattern results in a constant exposure time of the interface between the material and the vapor phase in the void space of the internal mixer. Devolatilization occurs according to two different mechanisms Molecular diffusion between the fluid elements in the surface layer of the wall film and the pool, and mass transport between the rubber phase and the vapor phase due to evaporation of the volatile component. As the diffusion rate of a liquid or a gas in a polymeric matrix is rather low, the main contribution to devolatilization is based on the mass transport between the surface layer of the polymeric material and the vapor phase. 

The simplified-kinetic-theory treatment of reaction rates must be regarded as relatively crude for several reasons. Numerical calculations are usually made in terms of either elastic hard spheres or hard spheres with superposed central attractions or repulsions, although such models of molecular interaction are better known for their mathematical tractability than for their realism. No account is taken of the internal motions of the reactants. The fact that every combination of initial and final states must be characterized by a different reaction cross section is not considered. In fact, the simplified-kinetic-theory treatment is based entirely on classical mechanics. Finally, although reaction cross sections are complicated averages of many inelastic cross sections associated with all possible processes by which reactants in a wide variety of initial states are converted to products in a wide variety of final states, the simplified kinetic theory approximates such cross sections by elastic cross sections appropriate to various transport properties, by cross sections deduced from crystal spacings or thermodynamic properties, or by order-of-magnitude estimates based on scientific experience and intuition. It is apparent, therefore, that the usual collision theory of reaction rates must be considered at best an order-of-magnitude approximation at worst it is an oversimplification that may be in error in principle as well as in detail. 

If desired, internal viscosity can be included by incorporating dashpots in parallel with the springs in the mechanical models. However, this introduces nonconservative forces into the problem. To avoid dealing with nonconservative forces, one can use momentum-space averages of the dashpot term as explained in DPL, Eq. 13C.2-2. We know of no molecular theory that can legitimize the use of dashpots in molecular models. 

---