Modeling semi-empirical

The Hartree-Fock approximation also provided the basis for what are now commonly referred to as semi-empirical models. These introduce additional approximations as well as empirical parameters to greatly simplify the calculations, with minimal adverse effect on the results. While this goal has yet to be fully realized, several useful schemes have resulted, including the popular AMI and PM3 models. Semi-empirical models have proven to be successful for the calculation of equilibrium geometries, including the geometries of transition-metal compounds. They are, however, not satisfactory for thermochemical calculations or for conformational assignments. Discussion is provided in Section n. 

Triplet methylene is known to be bent with a bond angle of approximately 136°. This is closely reproduced by all Hartree-Fock models (except for STO-3G which yields a bond angle approximately 10° too small), as well as local density models, BP, BLYP, EDFl and B3LYP density functional models and MP2 models. Semi-empirical models also suggest a bent structure, but with an HCH angle which is much too large. 

The second problem also reflects the exceptional difficulty of exploring complex conformational energy surfaces. Quite simply, only the lowest-cost methods are applicable to anything but molecules with only a few degrees of conformational freedom. In practice and at the present time, this translates to molecular mechanics models. (Semi-empirical quantum chemical models might also represent practical alternatives, except for the fact that they perform poorly in this role.) Whereas molecular mechanics models such as MMFF seem to perform quite well, the fact of the matter is, outside the range of their explicit parameterization, their performance is uncertain at best. 

Dipole moments for hypervalent molecules calculated from semi-empirical models are generally larger than experimental values (sometimes by a factor of two or more), suggesting descriptions which are too ionic. Figure 10-11 provides an overview for the PM3 model. Semi-empirical models should not be used. 

The proposed mechanisms of models to explain the drag reduction phenomenon are based on either a molecular approach or fluid dynamical continuum considerations, but these models are mainly empirical or semi-empirical in nature. Models constructed from the equations of motion (or energy) and from the constitutive equations of the dilute polymer solutions are generally not suitable for use in engineering applications due to the difficulty of placing numerical values on all the parameters. In the absence of a more generally accurate model, semi-empirical ones remain the most useful for applications. 

Pending the development of appropriate mechanistic theoretical modeling, semi-empirical models derived from dedicated constant amplitude and variable amplitude tests are the most likely to lead to engineering design rules. 

Although the macromolecules constituting the dissolved organic matter often contain a large number of complexing sites, the experimental titration curve is evaluated by simple interpretation models. Semi-empirical models are frequently sufficient for comparative purposes and to describe the environmental properties of the metals studied. 

It has long been recognized that the liquid-drop model semi-empirical mass equation cannot calculate the correct masses in the vicinity of neutron and proton magic numbers. More recently it was realized that it is less successful also for very deformed nuclei midway between closed nucleon shells. Introduction of magic numbers and deformations in the liquid drop model improved its predictions for deformed nuclei and of fission barrier heights. However, an additional complication with the liquid-drop model arose when isomers were discovered which decayed by spontaneous fission. Between uranium and... 

The most commonly used model for understanding the relationship between the hyperpolarizability P and molecular structure is the two-state model (Oudar and Chemla, 1977). This model provides only a rough description but it allows a qualitative understanding of the nonlinear optical properties of molecules. For push-pull compounds with electron donors and acceptors, the P value depends mainly on the intramolecular polarization, the oscillator strength, and the excited state of the material (Allis and Spencer, 2001). There are three different possibilities for a refinement of the two-state model semi-empirical, ab initio and density functional theory methods (Li et al., 1992 Kanis et al., 1994 Kurtz and Dudis, 1998). 

Ho , 8 is between zero and unity, and perturbation otpansions are avaOaUe ng S, and r as series in powers of AsMc. The parameter 8, which is zero in the treatment of Kuzuu and Doi [150,151], was added to the stress tensor by Lee in an ud hoc treatment [154] by analogy with work on related models. Semi-empirical representations of numerical calculations of S and r are given above, and the functions X and p may be represented by the semi-empirical expressions ... 

Functional fonns based on the above ideas are used in the FIFD [127] and Tang-Toeimies models [129], where the repulsion tenn is obtained by fitting to Flartree-Fock calculations, and in the XC model [92] where the repulsion is modelled by an ab initio Coulomb tenn and a semi-empirical exchange-repulsion tenn Cunent versions of all these models employ an individually damped dispersion series for the attractive... 

To calculate N (E-Eq), the non-torsional transitional modes have been treated as vibrations as well as rotations [26]. The fomier approach is invalid when the transitional mode s barrier for rotation is low, while the latter is inappropriate when the transitional mode is a vibration. Hamionic frequencies for the transitional modes may be obtained from a semi-empirical model [23] or by perfomiing an appropriate nomial mode analysis as a fiinction of the reaction path for the reaction s potential energy surface [26]. Semiclassical quantization may be used to detemiine anliamionic energy levels for die transitional modes [27]. 

Molecular dipole moments are often used as descriptors in QPSR models. They are calculated reliably by most quantum mechanical techniques, not least because they are part of the parameterization data for semi-empirical MO techniques. Higher multipole moments are especially easily available from semi-empirical calculations using the natural atomic orbital-point charge (NAO-PC) technique [40], but can also be calculated rehably using ab-initio or DFT methods. They have been used for some QSPR models. 

The molecular electronic polarizability is one of the most important descriptors used in QSPR models. Paradoxically, although it is an electronic property, it is often easier to calculate the polarizability by an additive method (see Section 7.1) than quantum mechanically. Ah-initio and DFT methods need very large basis sets before they give accurate polarizabilities. Accurate molecular polarizabilities are available from semi-empirical MO calculations very easily using a modified version of a simple variational technique proposed by Rivail and co-workers [41]. The molecular electronic polarizability correlates quite strongly with the molecular volume, although there are many cases where both descriptors are useful in QSPR models. 

Breindl et. al. published a model based on semi-empirical quantum mechanical descriptors and back-propagation neural networks [14]. The training data set consisted of 1085 compounds, and 36 descriptors were derived from AMI and PM3 calculations describing electronic and spatial effects. The best results with a standard deviation of 0.41 were obtained with the AMl-based descriptors and a net architecture 16-25-1, corresponding to 451 adjustable parameters and a ratio of 2.17 to the number of input data. For a test data set a standard deviation of 0.53 was reported, which is quite close to the training model. 

The success of simple theoretical models m determining the properties of stable molecules may not carry over into reaction pathways. Therefore, ah initio calcii lation s with larger basis sets ni ay be more successful in locatin g transition structures th an semi-empir-ical methods, or even methods using minimal or small basis sets. 

Kurst G R, R A Stephens and R W Phippen 1990. Computer Simulation Studies of Anisotropic iystems XIX. Mesophases Formed by the Gay-Berne Model Mesogen. Liquid Crystals 8 451-464. e F J, F Has and M Orozco 1990. Comparative Study of the Molecular Electrostatic Potential Ibtained from Different Wavefunctions - Reliability of the Semi-Empirical MNDO Wavefunction. oumal of Computational Chemistry 11 416-430. 

In this section, the conceptual framework of molecular orbital theory is developed. Applications are presented and problems are given and solved within qualitative and semi-empirical models of electronic structure. Ab Initio approaches to these same matters, whose solutions require the use of digital computers, are treated later in Section 6. Semi-empirical methods, most of which also require access to a computer, are treated in this section and in Appendix F. 

Each of these tools has advantages and limitations. Ab initio methods involve intensive computation and therefore tend to be limited, for practical reasons of computer time, to smaller atoms, molecules, radicals, and ions. Their CPU time needs usually vary with basis set size (M) as at least M correlated methods require time proportional to at least M because they involve transformation of the atomic-orbital-based two-electron integrals to the molecular orbital basis. As computers continue to advance in power and memory size, and as theoretical methods and algorithms continue to improve, ab initio techniques will be applied to larger and more complex species. When dealing with systems in which qualitatively new electronic environments and/or new bonding types arise, or excited electronic states that are unusual, ab initio methods are essential. Semi-empirical or empirical methods would be of little use on systems whose electronic properties have not been included in the data base used to construct the parameters of such models. 

C. Semi-Empirical Models that Treat Electron-Electron Interactions 1. The ZDO Approximation... 

Model Builder to get a reasonable starting geometry, with the possibility of refining the geometry by semi-empirical calculations before submitting it to ab initio computation. 

---