Mixed spin-state pairs

Garate-Morales et and Sanchez-Sandoval et al report the preparation and spectroscopic properties of new pinch porphyrins, which have as axial ligands a pair of pyridines joined by a flexible covalent linkage (hence the pinch ). The authors used chemical shifts of meso-C-H and methyl proton resonances to characterize the mixed spin states (S = 3/2, 5/2) of these compounds. 

C.M. Grunert, S. Reiman, H. Spiering, J.A. Kitchen, S. Brooker, P. Gutlich, Mixed spin-state [HS-LS] pairs in a dinuclear spin transition complex confirmation by variable-temperature Fe Mossbauer Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Inter. Ed. 47, 2997-2999 (2008)... 

More abstractly the condition Tr (p+p ) = iV implies that the part of the Hilbert space defined by the projection operator p should be fully contained in the part defined by the projection operator p+. If we now vary p slightly so that this condition is no longer fulfilled, Eq. II.GO shows that the pure spin state previously described by the Slater determinant becomes mixed up with states of higher quantum numbers S = m+1,. . . . The idea of the electron pairing in doubly occupied orbitals is therefore essential in the Hartree-Fock scheme in order to secure that the Slater determinant really represents a pure spin state. This means, however, that, in the calculation of the best spin orbitals y>k(x), there is a new auxiliary condition of the form... 

The origin of postulate (iii) lies in the electron-nuclear hyperfine interaction. If the energy separation between the T and S states of the radical pair is of the same order of magnitude as then the hyperfine interaction can represent a driving force for T-S mixing and this depends on the nuclear spin state. Only a relatively small preference for one spin-state compared with the other is necessary in the T-S mixing process in order to overcome the Boltzmann polarization (1 in 10 ). The effect is to make n.m.r. spectroscopy a much more sensitive technique in systems displaying CIDNP than in systems where only Boltzmann distributions of nuclear spin states obtain. More detailed consideration of postulate (iii) is deferred until Section II,D. 

If the radical pair had been created initially through the S manifold, T-S mixing would again select the j8 spin states. Thus the time development would yield T radical pairs and e-products enriched in j8 spin states whereas S radical pairs and c-products would be enriched in the spin state. CIDNP spectra can therefore distinguish between T and S precursors. 

OIDEP usually results from Tq-S mixing in radical pairs, although T i-S mixing has also been considered (Atkins et al., 1971, 1973). The time development of electron-spin state populations is a function of the electron Zeeman interaction, the electron-nuclear hyperfine interaction, the electron-electron exchange interaction, together with spin-rotational and orientation dependent terms (Pedersen and Freed, 1972). Electron spin lattice relaxation Ti = 10 to 10 sec) is normally slower than the polarizing process. 

The effect of magnetic field on a spin - dependent reactions in solids is valid, provided that [7] the time Tpair of particles staying in the paired state must be longer than the time needed for mixing the spin states tev, but shorter than the relaxation time rrei with the value typical for molecular crystals 10 6... 

To understand any coherence other than SQC, we need a new and more general definition of coherence. Coherence arises from the quantum mechanical mixing or overlap of spin states ( superposition ). In the two spin system (I, S = ll, 13C) we have four spin states (aa, up, pa, and PP), which are all stable states of defined energy. Let s talk about a single - C pair (one molecule). It is possible for this pair to be in any one of the four energy states, but it is also possible for the pair to be in a mixture or overlap or superposition of two states. This is one of the fundamental tenets of quantum mechanics Sometimes you cannot be sure which energy state a particle is in. Let s say that this particular pair is in a mixture of states aa and pp ... 

For a radical pair born in a triplet state, Cf(0) = 1 and the possibility of the pair being in the singlet state (via S-To mixing) for a nuclear spin state ab at time t can be obtained by substituting eq. 6 into eq. 4 ... 

Here, H is the spin Hamiltoniam of the radical ion pair (RIP), R is the relaxation super operator, and K is the reaction operator. In H, the effect of the Zeeman interaction within the Ru -moiety is most efficient in pair spin state mixing due to the strong anisotropy of the g-... 

---