Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Miscibility complete, requirement

Systems with Upper and Lower Critical Solution Temperature. In the case of some liquids which are only partially miscible, complete solution is possible both above an upper C.S.T. and below a lower C.S.T., giving rise to solubility curves of the type indicated in Fig. 2.3. Despite the several examples which have been discovered where apparently the composition of both upper and lower critical points are nearly the same, there is no requirement that this be the case. [Pg.8]

Type A. Component 1 is only partially miscible with components 2 through m, but components 2 through m are completely miscible with each other. Binary data only are required for this type of system ... [Pg.73]

Of course, LC is not often carried out with neat mobile-phase fluids. As we blend solvents we must pay attention to the phase behavior of the mixtures we produce. This adds complexity to the picture, but the same basic concepts still hold we need to define the region in the phase diagram where we have continuous behavior and only one fluid state. For a two-component mixture, the complete phase diagram requires three dimensions, as shown in Figure 7.2. This figure represents a Type I mixture, meaning the two components are miscible as liquids. There are numerous other mixture types (21), many with miscibility gaps between the components, but for our purposes the Type I mixture is Sufficient. [Pg.154]

In the previous sections, we indicated how, under certain conditions, pressure may be used to induce immiscibility in liquid and gaseous binary mixtures which at normal pressures are completely miscible. We now want to consider how the introduction of a third component can bring about immiscibility in a binary liquid that is completely miscible in the absence of the third component. Specifically, we are concerned with the case where the added component is a gas in this case, elevated pressures are required in order to dissolve an appreciable amount of the added component in the binary liquid solvent. For the situation to be discussed, it should be clear that phase instability is not a consequence of the effect of pressure on the chemical potentials, as was the case in the previous sections, but results instead from the presence of an additional component which affects the chemical potentials of the components to be separated. High pressure enters into our discussion only indirectly, because we want to use a highly volatile substance for the additional component. [Pg.194]

For pesticide residue immunoassays, matrices may include surface or groundwater, soil, sediment and plant or animal tissue or fluids. Aqueous samples may not require preparation prior to analysis, other than concentration. For other matrices, extractions or other cleanup steps are needed and these steps require the integration of the extracting solvent with the immunoassay. When solvent extraction is required, solvent effects on the assay are determined during assay optimization. Another option is to extract in the desired solvent, then conduct a solvent exchange into a more miscible solvent. Immunoassays perform best with water-miscible solvents when solvent concentrations are below 20%. Our experience has been that nearly every matrix requires a complete validation. Various soil types and even urine samples from different animals within a species may cause enough variation that validation in only a few samples is not sufficient. [Pg.647]

According to Flory-Huggins theory, in the limit of x the critical x parameter is 0.5.(H) Below this value the polymer and solvent will be miscible in all proportions. Above this value, the solvent will not dissolve the polymer, but will act only as a swelling solvent. Thus, the pure solvent may not dissolve the polymer even though it is not crosslinked. If x is not , the critical value of x is larger, but the same qualitative arguments regarding mutual solubility of the solvent and polymer hold. Thus, the application of Equation 1 does not require that the pure solvent be able to completely dissolve the polymer, only that the solvent dissolve into the polymer by an amount that can be measured. [Pg.138]

When more organic solvent power is needed, nonazeotropic mixtures of PFCs and HCs are also available. They are formulated to take advantage of the inerting ability of the PFCs and therefore do not have flash points. Although most hydrocarbons do not exhibit appreciable solubility in PFCs, numerous useful PFC/HC combinations do exist. Some PFC/HC mixtures exhibit complete miscibility and are thus limited only by flash points and flammability. To develop a mixture, the HC solvent(s) can be selected to provide the required solvency properties and substrate compatibility, then an appropriate PFC inerting solvent can be selected. Table 6.6 lists PFC/HC mixtures that have no flash point at the indicated concentrations. Some of these mixtures, or their recipes, are being offered on an experimental basis for evaluation purposes. [Pg.116]

The volume-related mixing power PIV presents an adequate scale-up criterion only in liquid/liquid dispersion processes and can be deduced from the pertinent process characteristics dpid We ° (dp is the particle or droplet diameter We is the Weber number). In the most common mixing operation, the homogenization of miscible liquids, where a macro- and back-mixing is required, this criterion fails completely [10] ... [Pg.22]

Tables IV to VIII present in concise form, though complete, the data from five papers (17, 106, 121, 211, 372), each giving miscibilities of a group of substances. The papers are in the form of triangular or rectangular charts similar to mileage charts on road maps. In each square is given M or S for miscible, I for immiscible, and usually R for reacts. This method is unsatisfactory for more than about 50 liquids because of the large area required. Since about 70% of the pairs are miscible, much of the space is largely wasted. Tables IV to VIII present in concise form, though complete, the data from five papers (17, 106, 121, 211, 372), each giving miscibilities of a group of substances. The papers are in the form of triangular or rectangular charts similar to mileage charts on road maps. In each square is given M or S for miscible, I for immiscible, and usually R for reacts. This method is unsatisfactory for more than about 50 liquids because of the large area required. Since about 70% of the pairs are miscible, much of the space is largely wasted.
Complete solid solubility requires that components have the same crystal structure, similar atomic size, electronegativity and valency. If any of these conditions are not met, a miscibility gap will occur in the solid state. [Pg.151]

A process requires the addition of a concentrated aqueous solution with a 1.4 specific gravity (1400 kg/m3) and a 15-cP (0.015 Pa s) viscosity to a polymer solution with a 1.0 specific gravity (1000 kg/m3) and an 18,000-cP (18 Pa s) viscosity. The two liquids are completely miscible and result in a final solution with a 1.1 specific gravity (1100 kg/m3) and a 15,000-cP (15 Pa s) viscosity. The final batch volume will be 8840 gal (33.5 m3), and the mixing will take place in a 9.5-ft-diameter (2.9-m) flat-bottom tank. Design the agitation system. [Pg.440]


See other pages where Miscibility complete, requirement is mentioned: [Pg.59]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.1294]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.693]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.618]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.1117]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.745]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.22 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info