Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Microscopic parameters evaluation

3 Analyses of predicted CLs microscopic structures 3.3.3.1 Microscopic parameters evaluation [Pg.79]

50 nm X 50 nm x 50 nm, analyzed by 3V method (Fermeglia and Pricl, 2007) (b) surface of the particles at the probe radius, p = 4 A (c) surface of the agglomerate at the probe radius, / = 4 nm and (d) a schematic drawing of the space difference between the agglomerate volume (Vo, marked in blue) and the particle volume (V, marked in pink), which constitutes the primary pore space of the CLs. [Pg.81]


The principal kiln conditions and microscopical parameters evaluated by Ono s technique are ... [Pg.46]

The microscopic polarity parameters evaluated with some guest molecules are listed in TABLE II, and APC(C2Lys2C 4)4 provides less polar microenvironments for these guests than APC(C101 )4. Relatively large fluorescence polarization (P) values were obtained for the probes incorporated into APC(C2Lys2C2 4)4 0.29, 0.31, and 0.21 for ANS, TNS, and PNA, respectively. Meanwhile, the P values are much smaller in ordinary media ... [Pg.44]

There are several standards that medical polymers must adhere to. One of the most common standards observed for polymeric materials is published by the United States Pharmacopeia (USP), which necessitates using animal models (in vivo) to test toxicity of elastomers, plastics, and other polymeric materials, prior to clinical use. The standard and forms of testing it outlines is considered in the medical industry as the minimum requirement for a polymeric material before it is considered for use in healthcare applications. According to the standard the biological response of the test animals are measured and determined via three main techniques (1) Systemic toxicity test Evaluates the effects of leachables of intravenously or intraperitoneally injected materials on systems such as the nervous or immune system (2) Intracutaneous test Evaluates local response to materials injected under the skin (3) Implantation test Both local tissue microscopic and macroscopic parameters evaluated at material implant sites. [Pg.383]

Inserting Eqs. 2 and 3, the inhomogeneous distribution (Eq. 1) can now be evaluated, resulting in expressions relating the experimentally accessible parameters, namely the solvent shift (spectral position of the band maximum with respect to its gas phase position) and the full width at half maximum Fs to the local number density p and to the microscopic parameters e, Ro, a, and [15]. [Pg.184]

Linear response theory is an example of a microscopic approach to the foundations of non-equilibrium thennodynamics. It requires knowledge of tire Hamiltonian for the underlying microscopic description. In principle, it produces explicit fomuilae for the relaxation parameters that make up the Onsager coefficients. In reality, these expressions are extremely difficult to evaluate and approximation methods are necessary. Nevertheless, they provide a deeper insight into the physics. [Pg.708]

Physical testing appHcations and methods for fibrous materials are reviewed in the Hterature (101—103) and are generally appHcable to polyester fibers. Microscopic analyses by optical or scanning electron microscopy are useful for evaluating fiber parameters including size, shape, uniformity, and surface characteristics. Computerized image analysis is often used to quantify and evaluate these parameters for quaUty control. [Pg.332]

Existing statistical methods permit prediction of macroscopic results of the processes without complete description of the microscopic phenomena. They are helpful in establishing the hydrodynamic relations of liquid flow through porous bodies, the evaluation of filtration quality with pore clogging, description of particle distributions and in obtaining geometrical parameters of random layers of solid particles. [Pg.80]

Ideally, a mathematical model would link yields and/or product properties with process variables in terms of fundamental process phenomena only. All model parameters would be taken from existing theories and there would be no need for adjusting parameters. Such models would be the most powerful at extrapolating results from small scale to a full process scale. The models with which we deal in practice do never reflect all the microscopic details of all phenomena composing the process. Therefore, experimental correlations for model parameters are used and/or parameters are evaluated by fitting the calculated process performance to that observed. [Pg.232]

It is usually unnecessary to obtain a microscopic examination on all urinalyses unless there are reasons to believe that important information and data may be lost. This is particularly true after it has been demonstrated that the test treatment does not affect the parameters measured in the microscopic evaluation of urine. [Pg.806]

Microscopic Subreactions and Macroscopic Proton Coefficients. The macroscopic proton coefficient may be used as a semi-empirical modeling variable when calibrated against major system parameters. However, x has also been used to evaluate the fundamental nature of metal/adsorbent interactions (e.g., 5). In this section, macroscopic proton coefficients (Xj and v) calculated from adsorption data are compared with the microscopic subreactions of the Triple-Layer Model ( 1 ) and their inter-relationships are discussed. [Pg.181]

Eqs. (4.140) and (4.150)-(4.152) are used to evaluate the response of the model composites in cyclic loading and the displacements 6 and 8, can be expressed as a function of the alternating stress, Aff, and the number of cycles, N. In experiments, degradation of the interface properties, e.g., the coefficient of friction, p or A(= 2pjfc/a), can also be expressed in terms of the cyclic loading parameters, Aoptical methods (with a microscope) or by means of more complicated instruments (see for example Naaman et al. (1992)) in fiber pull-out. Alternatively, they can be directly determined from the load and load-point displacement records in the case of fiber push-out. [Pg.160]

Changes in the specific properties of the polymer can also be taken as a hint of some form of degradation. Properties examined include different aspects of physical behaviour of the polymer, different microscopic images, or changes in simple parameters such as the total weight of the polymer in the test or an altered molecular mass of the polymer under evaluation. [Pg.146]

Cardiovascular effects have been evaluated in acute, intermediate, and chronic oral studies with experimental animals. Acute studies have been limited to histological examination of the heart following 1-day or 10-day gavage exposure of rats to doses as high as 198 mg barium/kg/day as barium chloride (Borzelleca et al. 1988). No microscopic lesions of the heart were observed. Other cardiovascular parameters were not evaluated. [Pg.30]


See other pages where Microscopic parameters evaluation is mentioned: [Pg.34]    [Pg.610]    [Pg.704]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.653]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.610]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.130]   


SEARCH



Microscope parameters

© 2024 chempedia.info