Keplerian motion

The application in [24] is to celestial mechanics, in which the reduced problem for consists of the Keplerian motion of planets around the sun and in which the impulses account for interplanetary interactions. Application to MD is explored in [14]. It is not easy to find a reduced problem that can be integrated analytically however. The choice /f = 0 is always possible and this yields the simple but effective leapfrog/Stormer/Verlet method, whose use according to [22] dates back to at least 1793 [5]. This connection should allay fears concerning the quality of an approximation using Dirac delta functions. 

For instance let us consider first the limit and two-body case g = v. For a negative energy h, we obtain an elliptic Keplerian motion with the period T = 27rv/(a3//i). The successive pericenter and apocenter distances gm and Qm verify ... 

This equation apparently contradicts the statements made that r is the heliocentric radius vector and pi is the barycentric linear momentum. However, this only means that the variation of rj in the reference Kep-lerian motion is not the actual relative velocity of the ith body but Pi/Pi-This means that, at variance with other formulations, the Keplerian motions defined by equations (12) are not tangent to the actual motions. To distinguish them from heliocentric osculating , when necessary, we will use the term heliocentric canonical . 

Tail When comets get closer to the Sun, a tail forms which always points in the direction opposite to the Sun because of the influence of solar wind and solar radiation pressure. There are two types of tails that point to slightly different directions. The ion tail consists of gas (plasma) points directly away from the Sun, because it is more strongly affected by the solar wind (and magnetic field since the particles are charged) than dust that is affected by the radiation pressure. The ion tail has a blueish appearance, the dust tail is brighter and curved (because of the Keplerian motion of particles). The cometary tails might become very spectacular and extend more than 1 AU (150 million km) (see Fig. 5.4). 

Solids in a gas-free orbit around a star will follow Keplerian orbits, meaning that their orbital velocity is found by balancing the centrifugal force of their motions with the central force of gravity from the star, or ... 

While a purely hydrodynamic source for turbulence has not yet been demonstrated, the situation is much different when MHD effects are considered in a shearing, Keplerian disk. In this case, the Rayleigh criterion for stability can be shown to be irrelevant provided only that the angular velocity of the disk decreases with radius, even an infinitesimal magnetic field will grow at the expense of the shear motions. 

In many cases there is only one massive body whose gravitational attraction provides the dominant force this is the case with a planetary system, where the Sun is the main attracting body, or a planet surrounded by satellites. In this case the motion of the small bodies (planets or satellites) follow Keplerian orbits, perturbed by the gravitational interaction between the small bodies. This is a nearly integrable dynamical system. In these systems resonances exist between the small bodies in their motion around the massive body. These correspond to periodic motion, and this makes clear the importance of the resonances in the dynamical properties of a nearly integrable system. 

The restricted three-body problem Two bodies of finite masses, called primaries, revolve around their common center of mass in circular orbits and a third body with negligible mass moves under their gravitational attraction, but does not affect the orbits of the two primaries. In most astronomical applications the second primary has a small mass compared to the first primary, and consequently the motion of the third, massless, body is a perturbed Keplerian orbit. This is a model for the study of an asteroid (Jupiter being the second primary), a trans-Neptunian object (Neptune being the second primary) or an Earth-like planet in an extrasolar planetary system. 

We shall apply the above described theory to the motion of a small body (asteroid, Kuiper belt object, satellite) moving around the Sun in a nearly Keplerian, elliptic, orbit, and perturbed by a major planet. 

Within one and the same theoretical mood, different specific applications of the concept of force can still be tried, as illustrated by the Keplerian and Newtonian schemes. Within each scheme, deviations from the assumed influence-free motion provide motives to construct a theory that succeeds in accounting for the deviations but because there are no guarantees that one will be able to do so, a rivalry arises between the two schemes. Their relative merits must be evaluated in the light of a shared commitment to the usual epistemic virtues associated with their fundamental aspirations, such as those of strict empirical adequacy and unification (cf. Nagel, 1979, section 7.II, for further discussion of the status of laws of motion). 

These are purely geometric relations, having only a kinematic basis. It is one of the results of classical celestial mechanics to provide a firm dynamical foundation for these relations, especially the Keplerian equal areas law and the harmonic law. For more complex orbits, those often found in multiple systems, it is usually best to calculate the motion of the body exactly. However, the relative ephemeris of an object can be expressed in terms of these orbital elements, which may change in time depending on the orbital stability. For instance, earth satellite orbits (e.g., the space shuttle or the Hubble Space Telescope) are referred to the earth s equatorial plane, while deep space satellites (like Voyager) are referred back to the ecliptic. 

---