Methane conclusions

Flame or Partial Combustion Processes. In the combustion or flame processes, the necessary energy is imparted to the feedstock by the partial combustion of the hydrocarbon feed (one-stage process), or by the combustion of residual gas, or any other suitable fuel, and subsequent injection of the cracking stock into the hot combustion gases (two-stage process). A detailed discussion of the kinetics for the pyrolysis of methane for the production of acetylene by partial oxidation, and some conclusions as to reaction mechanism have been given (12). 

Mcntasty el al. [35] and others [13, 36] have measured methane uptakes on zeolites. These materials, such as the 4A, 5A and 13X zeolites, have methane uptakes which are lower than would be predicted using the above relationship. This suggests that either the zeolite cavity is more attractive to 77 K nitrogen than a carbon pore, or methane at 298 K, 3.4 MPa, is attracted more to a carbon pore than a zeolite. The latter proposition is supported by the modeling of Cracknel et al. [37, 38], who show that methane densities in silica cavities will be lower than for the equivalent size parallel slit shaped pore of their model carbon. Results reported by Ventura [39] for silica xerogels lead to a similar conclusion. Thus, porous silica adsorbents with equivalent nitrogen derived micropore volumes to carbons adsorb and deliver less methane. For delivery of 150 V./V a silica based adsorbent would requne a micropore volume in excess of 0.70 ml per ml of packed vessel volume. 

In the application of Equation 3 to the methanation of CO by the reaction CO + 3H2 CH4 + H20, starting with a mixture of e.g. 90% CO and 10% H2 and using CO as X would lead to the erroneous conclusion that methanation is impossible under these conditions. The requirement is that Equation 3, operating on one constituent, can only be accurate (even when diffusion is strictly controlling) if X is present at a low concentration. To solve the 90% CO-10 % H2 case previously men-... 

Such is not the case, and furthermore, the presence of NHS does not alter product ratios in favor of the more highly deuterated species as it does in the methane systems. The additional observation that C2D6 is untouched in TD/D2 C2H6/C2D6 mixtures (Table III, System III) makes the evidence against ethanium ion-ethane proton transfer conclusive. 

Subsequently, the problem was investigated by Karpov and Severin [6]. They used closed vessels with a diameter of 10cm and 10, 5, and 2.5cm width, initially at atmospheric pressure. The vessels were filled with different lean hydrogen and methane/air mixtures and rotational speeds in the range of 130-4201/s were employed. They also included data from the study of Babkin et al. [3] in their analysis. Unfortunately, they did not observe the flame itself and measured only the pressure rise in the vessel, which was compared with pressure development in the vessel without rotahon, to draw a conclusion with respect to flame speeds and quenching. 

Controlled elimination of mass and heat transport resistances is an important prerequisite for obtaining intrinsic kinetic parameters of the fast exothermic reaction of partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas. It has been demonstrated that under conditions of strong transport limitations erroneous conclusions concerning the reaction scheme can be derived [7-9]. It was determined in this laboratory that transport limitations are practically absent over a wide range of operating conditions if one portion of the catalyst (< 40 pm) is diluted with -5 portions of an... 

With catalysts such as nickel and rhodium for which it has been shown that 1-2 hydrogenolysis is seriously competitive with 1-3 hydrogenolysis, there is no need to assume that ir-olefin/allyl hydrogenolysis occurs (but neither can it with certainty be excluded). This conclusion is likely to be true for other catalysts such as cobalt and iron which also favor complete hydrocarbon fragmentation to methane. 

The reason for this lies in the relatively high cost of gas compression, which depends on the ratio of the inlet and outlet pressures. The methane feed to the reformer will probably be available at a pressure much above 1 bar and similarly with the steam. Le Chatelier s principle indicates also that excess steam, as used in practice, will favour a higher conversion of methane compared with the stoichiometric proportions of the reactants. The same conclusion follows quantitatively from Kpi for which the equation involves the total pressure P. 

A similar conclusion, that the alternative pathways sometimes differ only slightly in the energy barrier, was reached in several more recent theoretical papers which investigated methane activation in ( N2 )PtCl2 systems relevant to the Catalytica process. It has been demonstrated experimentally that compared with (bipyrimidine)PtCl2,... 

An explosion demolishing an empty building was dubiously attributed to ignition of methane evolved from bat droppings [1]. There was much argument as to the probability of this [2], the eventual conclusion being that sewer gas from a septic tank was responsible. 

Drawing a Conclusion How does your experimental molar mass compare with the molar masses of methane, ethane, and propane Suggest which of these gases are in the burner gas in your laboratory. 

---