Metal exchange-current density

The anode and cathode corrosion currents, fcorr.A and fcorr,B. respectively, are estimated at the intersection of the cathode and anode polarization of uncoupled metals A and B. Conventional electrochemical cells as well as the polarization systems described in Chapter 5 are used to measure electrochemical kinetic parameters in galvanic couples. Galvanic corrosion rates are determined from galvanic currents at the anode. The rates are controlled by electrochemical kinetic parameters like hydrogen evolution exchange current density on the noble and active metal, exchange current density of the corroding metal, Tafel slopes, relative electroactive area, electrolyte composition, and temperature. 

Fig. 3. Hypothetical Evans diagram and polarization curve for a metal corroding in an acidic solution, where point A represents the current density, /q, for the hydrogen electrode at equiUbrium point B, the exchange current density at the reversible or equiUbrium potential, for M + 2e and point...

A metal when immersed in a solution of its cations may take up the reversible potential corresponding with the M exchange process, but whether or not this occurs in practice will depend on the magnitude of its exchange current density in relation to any others that are possible due to other exchange processes in the solution under consideration. In oxygenated solution the and 02 0H equilibria provide possible alterna-... 

Exchange. current.densities for several noble metals and a... 

Table 21.16 Exchange current densities for several noble metals and a platinum-rhodium alloy in the reduction of oxygen from perchloric acid solution ...

Little work has been done on bare lithium metal that is well defined and free of surface film [15-24], Odziemkowski and Irish [15] showed that for carefully purified LiAsF6 tetrahydrofuran (THF) and 2-methyltetrahydrofuran 2Me-THF electrolytes the exchange-current density and corrosion potential on the lithium surface immediately after cutting in situ, are primarily determined by two reactions anodic dissolution of lithium, and cathodic reduc-... 

Again the extent to which such parallel reactions contribute to the measured current is not very easy to quantify. However, fortunately, such a quantification is not necessary for the description of NEMCA. What is needed is only a measure of the overall electrocatalytic activity of the metal-solid electrolyte interface or, equivalently, of the tpb, and this can be obtained by determining the value of a single electrochemical parameter, the exchange current I0, which is related to the exchange current density i0 via ... 

Yet the view that the rates of electron transfer in simple reactions are principally independent of the electrode metal (which for some time had been current in the electrochemical literature) cannot be maintained in this strict form. Many experimental data relating to the exchange current densities of reactions involving simple cations (such as Fe and Fe ) provide evidence that the electrode metal does exert a rather strong influence on the reaction rates. 

It was demonstrated, however, in 1947 by John O M. Bockris that between the exchange current densities of the hydrogen reaction at different metals and the values of the electron work function (into vacuum), a definite correfation does exist. Many workers have confirmed this correlation. An example of this correlation is shown as a plot of log f vs. X° in Fig. 28.2. 

FIGURE 28.2 Relation between the exchange current densities of hydrogen evolution and ionization at different metals and the electron work functions. 

One of the many published correlations between the logarithms of exchange current density of the hydrogen reaction at different metals and the values of hydrogen-bond energy on the same metals is reported in Fig. 28.3. Considering all the points mentioned, one can certainly conclude that a certain bell shape does exist in this plot, but it would not be justified to draw any quantitative conclusions going beyond this assertion (Petrii and Tsirlina, 1994). 

It is clear from the calculated limiting-current curves in Fig. 3a that the plateau of the copper deposition reaction at a moderate limiting-current level like 50 mA cm 2 is narrowed drastically by the surface overpotential. On the other hand, the surface overpotential is small for reduction of ferri-cyanide ion at a nickel or platinum electrode (Fig. 3b). At noble-metal electrodes in well-supported solutions, the exchange current density appears to be well above 0.5 A/cm2 (Tla, S20b, D6b, A3e). At various types of carbon, the exchange current density is appreciably smaller (Tla, S17a, S17b). 

The exchange current density of Pt-metals is relatively small, but they have high stability. Very high cost does not permit to use them in the batteries of wide application. Noticeably higher activity, very good stability and lower costs are demonstrated by silver. The most inexpensive catalyst is activated carbon that has very high surface area. This type of catalyst is used in some batteries. Activity of carbon electrode can be improved by additive of oxide (e.g. Mn02) or pyropolymers. 

Another problem that is common for all membrane-based solid-state sensors is the ill-defined membrane-metal interface. A large exchange current density is required to produce a reversible interface for a stable potentiometric sensor response. One approach to improving this interface is to use conducting polymers. Conducting polymers are electroactive n-conjugated polymers with mixed ionic and electronic conductivity. They... 

Figure 9.4 Exchange current density for the hydrogen evolution reaction at various metals data taken from Trasatti [5].

---