Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Metal dissolution polarization

In the polarization curve for anodic dissolution of iron in a phosphoric acid solution without CP ions, as shown in Fig. 3, we can see three different states of metal dissolution. The first is the active state at the potential region of the less noble metal where the metal dissolves actively, and the second is the passive state at the more noble region where metal dissolution barely proceeds. In the passive state, an extremely thin oxide film called a passive film is formed on the metal surface, so that metal dissolution is restricted. In the active state, on the contrary, the absence of the passive film leads to the dissolution from the bare metal surface. The difference of the dissolution current between the active and passive states is quite large for a system of an iron electrode in 1 mol m"3 sulfuric acid, the latter value is about 1/10,000 of the former value.6... [Pg.222]

When such a polyfunctional electrode is polarized, the net current, i, will be given by ii - 4. When the potential is made more negative, the rate of cathodic hydrogen evolution will increase (Fig. 13.2b, point B), and the rate of anodic metal dissolution will decrease (point B ). This effect is known as cathodic protection of the metal. At potentials more negative than the metaTs equilibrium potential, its dissolution ceases completely. When the potential is made more positive, the rate of anodic dissolution will increase (point D). However, at the same time the rate of cathodic hydrogen evolution will decrease (point D ), and the rate of spontaneous metal dissolution (the share of anodic dissolution not associated with the net current but with hydrogen evolution) will also decrease. This phenomenon is known as the difference effect. [Pg.238]

Fig. 11-6. Polarization curves of anodic metal dissolution and of cathodic oxidant reduction at a corroding metallic electrode (mixed electrode) s equilibrium... Fig. 11-6. Polarization curves of anodic metal dissolution and of cathodic oxidant reduction at a corroding metallic electrode (mixed electrode) s equilibrium...
Figure 11-7 shows the polarization curve of an iron electrode in an acidic solution in which the anodic reaction is the anodic transfer of iron ions for metal dissolution (Tafel slope 40 mV/decade) the cathodic reaction is the cathodic transfer of electrons for reduction of hydrogen ions (Tafel slope 120 mV /decade) across the interface of iron electrode. [Pg.379]

Fig. 11-9. Anodic polarization curve of a metallic electrode for active dissolution, passivation, and transpassivation in aqueous acidic solution > u = anodic current of metal dissolution = passivation potential = transpassivation potential = maximum metal... Fig. 11-9. Anodic polarization curve of a metallic electrode for active dissolution, passivation, and transpassivation in aqueous acidic solution > u = anodic current of metal dissolution = passivation potential = transpassivation potential = maximum metal...
Fig. 11-10. Anodic polarization curves observed for metallic iron, nickel, and chromium electrodes in a sulfuric acid solution (0.5 M H 2SO 4) at 25°C solid curve = anodic metal dissolution current dot-dash curve s anodic oxygen evolution current [Sato-Okamoto, 1981.]... Fig. 11-10. Anodic polarization curves observed for metallic iron, nickel, and chromium electrodes in a sulfuric acid solution (0.5 M H 2SO 4) at 25°C solid curve = anodic metal dissolution current dot-dash curve s anodic oxygen evolution current [Sato-Okamoto, 1981.]...
As described in Sec. 11.3, the spontaneous corrosion potential of a corroding metal is represented by the intersection of the anodic polarization curve of metal dissolution with the cathodic polarization curve of oxidant reduction (Figs. 11—5 and 11-6). Then, whether a metal electrode is in the active or in the passive state is determined by the intersection of the anodic and cathodic polarization curves. [Pg.387]

This allows metal dissolution-deposition processes to occur at a relatively low overpotential. A typical example for such behavior is lithium in many polar aprotic systems. The nature of the surface films in these cases determines the following possibilities ... [Pg.301]

This is the case for magnesium and calcium electrodes whose cations are bivalent. The surface films formed on such metals in a wide variety of polar aprotic systems cannot transport the bivalent cations. Such electrodes are blocked for the metal deposition [28-30], However, anodic processes may occur via the breakdown and repair mechanism. Due to the positive electric field, which is the driving force for the anodic processes, the film may be broken and cracked, allowing metal dissolution. Continuous metal dissolution creates an unstable situation in the metal-film and metal-solution interfaces and prevents the formation of stable passivating films. Thus, once the surface films are broken and a continuous electrical field is applied, continuous metal dissolution may take place at a relatively low overpotential (compared with the high overpotential required for the initial breakdown of the surface films). Typical examples are calcium dissolution processes in several polar aprotic systems [31]. [Pg.303]

Metallic corrosion occurs because of the coupling of two different electrochemical reactions on the material surface. If, as assumed in the discussion of iron dissolution kinetics above, only iron oxidation and reduction were possible, the conservation of charge would require that in the absence of external polarization, the iron be in thermodynamic equilibrium. Under those conditions, no net dissolution would occur. In real systems, that assumption is invalid, and metallic dissolution occurs with regularity, keeping corrosionists employed and off the street. [Pg.41]

Figure 28 Polarization curves on Pt and Fe in alkaline sulfide solution at 65°C illustrating danger of interpreting all anodic current as due to metal dissolution. Above approximately —0.7 V(SCE), the anodic current on both Pt and Fe is dominated by sulfide oxidation. Figure 28 Polarization curves on Pt and Fe in alkaline sulfide solution at 65°C illustrating danger of interpreting all anodic current as due to metal dissolution. Above approximately —0.7 V(SCE), the anodic current on both Pt and Fe is dominated by sulfide oxidation.
An additional interpretation issue involves the presence of oxidation reactions that are not metal dissolution. Figure 28 shows polarization curves generated for platinum and iron in an alkaline sulfide solution (21). The platinum data show the electrochemistry of the solution species sulfide is oxidized above -0.8 V(SCE). Sulfide is also oxidized on the iron surface, its oxidation dominating the anodic current density on iron above a potential of approximately -0.7 V(SCE). Without the data from the platinum polarization scan, the increase in current on the iron could be mistakenly interpreted as increased iron dissolution. The more complex the solution in which the corrosion occurs, the more likely that it contains one or more electroactive species. Polarization scans on platinum can be invaluable in this regard. [Pg.47]

Corrosion control using external polarization usually operates by reducing the driving force for the metal dissolution reaction, as in cathodic protection. For passivating metals, an alternative is to reduce the kinetics of the dissolution process by raising the potential. This is known as anodic protection and has been... [Pg.69]

Concentration overpotential is also observed when the surface concentration is increased over the bulk concentration. The most common example is the anodic dissolution of a metal. Suppose that, after part of the metal ion has been plated out from the solution in the above example, the applied emf is decreased to a value below the reversible back emf. The ceU now will operate as a galvanic cell, with the metal-plated electrode acting as the anode. The metal ion concentration at the anode surface becomes greater thah the bulk concentration of metal ion. As anodic polarization is increased, however, there is no limit to the surface concentration of metal ion except that imposed by the solubility of a salt. Since the surface concentration would have to be 10 times the bulk concentration to produce a concentration overpotential of 0.059/n V, the anodic concentration overpotential for metal dissolution is generally small unless the bulk concentration is low. [Pg.262]


See other pages where Metal dissolution polarization is mentioned: [Pg.1945]    [Pg.2722]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.682]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.849]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.1115]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.81 ]




SEARCH



Metal dissolution

Polarization curve of anodic metal dissolution

Polarization curves pitting dissolution, metals

© 2024 chempedia.info