Mesoscale model Monte Carlo simulation

Mesoscale simulations model a material as a collection of units, called beads. Each bead might represent a substructure, molecule, monomer, micelle, micro-crystalline domain, solid particle, or an arbitrary region of a fluid. Multiple beads might be connected, typically by a harmonic potential, in order to model a polymer. A simulation is then conducted in which there is an interaction potential between beads and sometimes dynamical equations of motion. This is very hard to do with extremely large molecular dynamics calculations because they would have to be very accurate to correctly reflect the small free energy differences between microstates. There are algorithms for determining an appropriate bead size from molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations. 

In the last section, we discussed the use of QC calculations to elucidate reaction mechanisms. First-principle atomistic calculations offer valuable information on how reactions happen by providing detailed PES for various reaction pathways. Potential energy surfaces can also be obtained as a function of electrode potential (for example see Refs. [16, 18, 33, 38]). However, these calculations do not provide information on the complex reaction kinetics that occur on timescales and lengthscales of electrochemical experiments. Mesoscale lattice models can be used to address this issue. For example, in Refs. [25, 51, 52] kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) simulations were used to simulate voltammetry transients in the timescale of seconds to model Pt(l 11) and Pt(lOO) surfaces containing up to 256x256 atoms. These models can be developed based on insights obtained from first-principle QC calculations and experiments. Theory and/or experiments can be used to parameterize these models. For example, rate theories [22, 24, 53, 54] can be applied on detailed potential energy surfaces from accurate QC calculations to calculate electrochemical rate constants. On the other hand, approximate rate constants for some reactions can be obtained from experiments (for example see Refs. [25, 26]). This chapter describes the later approach. 

This chapter is organized as follows. In section 1.1, we introduce our notation and present the details of the molecular and mesoscale simulations the expanded ensemble-density of states Monte Carlo method,and the evolution equation for the tensor order parameter [5]. The results of both approaches are presented and compared in section 1.2 for the cases of one or two nanoscopic colloids immersed in a confined liquid crystal. Here the emphasis is on the calculation of the effective interaction (i.e. potential of mean force) for the nanoparticles, and also in assessing the agreement between the defect structures found by the two approaches. In section 1.3 we apply the mesoscopic theory to a model LC-based sensor and analyze the domain coarsening process by monitoring the equal-time correlation function for the tensor order parameter, as a function of the concentration of adsorbed nanocolloids. We present our conclusions in Section 1.4. 

The prediction of physical and chemical properties by computational methods is becoming more and more common in the research area, thanks in part to the computational power available at a low cost. Various computational methods exist to model amorphous materials (e.g., polymers) that are readily available to the modeler molecular dynamics (MD), Monte Carlo, transition state theory (TST), and mesoscale simulations, to name a few. For a complete review of these methods, see Refs. [5] and [6]. Recently, MD simulations of up to 3 ns have been performed to estimate the diffusivity of small gas molecules in amorphous m-l,4-polybutadiene (cis-PBD)J... 

---