Mesopore, definition

Adsorbents such as some silica gels and types of carbons and zeolites have pores of the order of molecular dimensions, that is, from several up to 10-15 A in diameter. Adsorption in such pores is not readily treated as a capillary condensation phenomenon—in fact, there is typically no hysteresis loop. What happens physically is that as multilayer adsorption develops, the pore becomes filled by a meeting of the adsorbed films from opposing walls. Pores showing this type of adsorption behavior have come to be called micropores—a conventional definition is that micropore diameters are of width not exceeding 20 A (larger pores are called mesopores), see Ref. 221a. 

According to their diameter, pores are conventionally classified as macropores (J>50nm), mesopores (2< J<50nm) and micropores (J<2nm). For nanometer-sized pores the term nanopores has been also used for some time (Handbook of Porous Solids, F. Schiith, K. Sing, J. Weitkamp (eds.), Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 2002) but the definition of nanopores is not fully established. In this chapter the term nanopore will be used for pores with 1 < J < 10 nm. 

The terminology is not yet homogeneous. The use of the prefix nano spread out in the 1990s. Until then, the common term used to be mesoscopic structures, which continues to be used. According to a definition by IUPAC of 1985, the following classification applies to porous materials microporous, < 2 nm pore diameter mesoporous, 2-50 nm macroporous, > 50 nm. 

Fig. 7. Size scale associated with soil mineral particles, organic components, pores and aggregations of mineral and organic components (Baldock 2002). The definitions of pore size have used those developed by IUPAC (micropores < 2 nm, mesopores 2-50 nm and macropores > 50 nm). Alternatively, the pore sizes corresponding to the lower ( /m = - 1500 kPa) and upper ( /m = - 100 kPa) limits of water availability to plants may be used to define the boundaries between the different classes of pore size. /m is soil water metric potential.

Pores are found in many solids and the term porosity is often used quite arbitrarily to describe many different properties of such materials. Occasionally, it is used to indicate the mere presence of pores in a material, sometimes as a measure for the size of the pores, and often as a measure for the amount of pores present in a material. The latter is closest to its physical definition. The porosity of a material is defined as the ratio between the pore volume of a particle and its total volume (pore volume + volume of solid) [1]. A certain porosity is a common feature of most heterogeneous catalysts. The pores are either formed by voids between small aggregated particles (textural porosity) or they are intrinsic structural features of the materials (structural porosity). According to the IUPAC notation, porous materials are classified with respect to their sizes into three groups microporous, mesoporous, and macroporous materials [2], Microporous materials have pores with diameters < 2 nm, mesoporous materials have pore diameters between 2 and 50 nm, and macroporous materials have pore diameters > 50 nm. Nowadays, some authors use the term nanoporosity which, however, has no clear definition but is typically used in combination with nanotechnology and nanochemistry for materials with pore sizes in the nanometer range, i.e., 0.1 to 100 nm. Nanoporous could thus mean everything from microporous to macroporous. 

The efiect is thus not related to geometrical constraints induced on complexes anchored in mesoporous charmels (sometimes also called as confinement efiect, even if this definition is not properly correct), neither to shape-selectivity effects as possible in zeolites, since the size of mesoporous charmels is much larger than those of micro-porous materials. Instead, an effective modification on the characteristics of the fluids is observed due to the electrostatic field generated by the charmel walls. This is an enthalpic effect versus an entropic effect as observed when the modification is instead related to limitations in the translation modes of molecules. Recently, it was also demonstrated that wall curvature influence the molecular orientation of the... 

N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and pore size distribution of sample II-IV are shown in Fig. 4. Its isotherm in Fig. 4a corresponds to a reversible type IV isotherm which is typical for mesoporous solids. Two definite steps occur at p/po = 0.18, and 0.3, which indicates the filling of the bimodal mesopores. Using the BJH procedure with the desorption isotherm, the pore diameter in Fig. 4a is approximately 1.74, and 2.5 nm. Furthermore, with the increasing of synthesis time, the isotherm in Fig. 4c presents the silicalite-1 material related to a reversible type I isotherm and mesoporous solids related to type IV isotherm, simultaneously. These isotherms reveals the gradual transition from type IV to type I. In addition, with the increase of microwave irradiation time, Fig. 4c shows a hysteresis loop indicating a partial disintegration of the mesopore structure. These results seem to show a gradual transformation... 

Relatively straightforward is the definition of nanoscopic voids. Nanopores and nanocavities are elongated voids or voids of any shape, and nanomaterials can incorporate especially nanopores in an ordered or disordered way. The former is of crucial importance for many of the hybrid materials discussed in the book (e.g., in Chapters 16 or 18). Nanochannel is also frequently used instead of nanopore, often in biological or biochemical contexts. Besides nanoporous, the term mesoporous is often found in hybrid materials research. Interestingly, the IUPAC has defined the terms mesoporous (pores with diameters between 2 and 50 nm), microporous (pores with diameters <2 nm) and macroporous (pores with diameters >50 nm), yet has not given a definition of nanoporous in the IUPAC Recommendations on the Nomenclature of Structural and Compositional Characteristics of Ordered Microporous and... 

According to the IUPAC definition, porous materials ate divided into three different classes, depending on their pore sizes. Mesoporous materials are described as materials whose pore diameters lie in the range between 2 and 50 nm. Solids with a pore diameter below 2 nm or above 50 nm belong to the class of micro- and macroporous materials, respectively. 

PSD in the mesopore (2-50 nm) and macropore (>50nm) regions can be reasonably obtained by different methods based on the Kelvin equation (like BJH, see below), since this equation describes rather well the equilibrium adsorption in these pores. However, there are no definitive methods for... 

Silica is one of the most abundant chemical substances on earth. It can be both crystalline or amorphous. The crystalline forms of silica are quartz, cristobalite, and tridymite [51,52]. The amorphous forms, which are normally porous [149] are precipitated silica, silica gel, colloidal silica sols, and pyrogenic silica [150-156], According to the definition of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), porous materials can be classified as follows microporous materials are those with pore diameters from 3 to 20 A mesoporous materials are those that have pore diameters between 20 and 500 A and macroporous materials are those with pores bigger than 500 A [149],... 

The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry has adopted the following definitions of pores by width micropores, < 2nm mesopores, 2-50 nm macropores. > 50 nm. 

For the five mixtures, the cumulative mesoporous volume, Feds, and mesoporous surface area, S edB, and are both linear decreasing functions of the micropore content y (Figure 2b). The cumulative specific surface area SedB is definitely a better estimator of the mesoporous surface than the specific surface S xt computed Ifom the t-plot. The lUPAC classification states that mesopores are pores whose width is larger that 2 nm. In the case of the cylindrical pore model retained for the pore size distribution, this is equivalent to radii larger than 1 nm. It should however be stressed that the calculation of the cumulative surface and volume of the mesopores must not be continued at lower pressures than the closing of the hysteresis loop (gray zones of Figures 3a and 3b). If a black box analysis tool is used and if the calculation is systematically continued down to 1 nm, severe overestimation of the mesopores surface and volume may occur. 

The focus of this chapter is on electron-transfer processes occmring in porous media, with particular emphasis on zeolitic, mesoporous materials and sol-gel-derived materials. The definition of different classes of porous solids as specified by lUPAC is based on the pore diameter ... 

In fact, the pore sizes of some mesoporous materials discussed in this chapter are slightly smaller than 2 nm. However, we still call them mesoporous materials even though they are beyond that official IUPAC definition. 

Finally, Asaeda and co-workers [52,53,64] reported separation results using membranes which are modified in such a way that pore sizes below the mesopore range (<2 nm) are obtained no definitive pore characteristics are given however. 

Three groups of pores of different width, tv, were defined by Dubinin [9]. The classification, which was adopted in a revised form by the lUPAC [10], is as follows in micropores tv< 2nm in mesopores w 2-50nm in macropores IV > 50 nm. It also expedient [11] to subdivide the micropores into ultramicropores (iv < 1 nm) and supermicropores (iv 1—2 nm). However, all these dimensions are somewhat arbitrary and imprecise because the stages of pore filhng are dependent on the gas-solid system as well as the pore geometry [11]. Similarly, there is no precise definition of the currently popular term nanopore, which is often applied to a pore in the supermicropore or narrow mesopore range. 

---