Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Mendelevium studies

These elements have all been named for famous scientists or for the places of their creation. For example, americium, berkelium, and californium were named after obvious geographical locations. Nobelium was named for the Nobel Institute, although later study proved it was not really created there. Curium was named for Marie Curie, the discoverer of radium. Einsteinium was named for the famous physicist, Albert Einstein. Fermium and lawrencium were named for Enrico Fermi and Ernest O. Lawrence, who made important discoveries in the field of radioactivity. Mendelevium was named for the discoverer of the periodic chart. [Pg.45]

The transeinsteinium actinides, fermium (Fm), mendelevium (Md), nobelium (No), and lawrencium (Lr), are not available in weighable (> ng) quantities, so these elements are unknown in the condensed bulk phase and only a few studies of their physicochemical behavior have been reported. Neutral atoms of Fm have been studied by atomic beam magnetic resonance 47). Thermochromatography on titanium and molybdenum columns has been employed to characterize some metallic state properties of Fm and Md 61). This article will not deal with the preparation of these transeinsteinium metals. [Pg.4]

Mendeleyev, Dmitri Ivanovich (1834-1907) A Russian chemist, teacher, and inventor, Mendeleyev studied the properties of liquids and the spectroscope before becoming a professor in Saint Petersburg and later serving as director of weights and measures. He created a periodic table of the sixty-three elements then known arranged by atomic mass and the similarity of properties (a revised form of which is still employed in modern science) and used the table to correctly predict the characteristics of elements and isotopes not yet found. Element 101, mendelevium, discovered in 1955, was named in his honor. [Pg.2011]

The discovery and identification of element 101 (mendelevium, Md) was a landmark experiment in many ways [ 1 ]. It was the first new transuranium element to be produced and identified on the basis of one-atom-at-a-time chemistry and it is also the heaviest element (to date) to be chemically identified by direct chemical separation of the element itself. All of the higher Z elements have been first identified by physical/nuclear techniques prior to study of their chemical properties. In fact, one of the criteria for chemical studies is that an isotope with known properties be used for positive identification of the element being studied. Due to relativistic effects [1] chemical properties cannot be reliably predicted and a meaningful study of chemical properties cannot be conducted with both unknown chemistry and unknown, non-specific nuclear decay properties ... [Pg.243]

In 1973, Mikheev et al. reported that a stable, monovalent Md ion could be produced in ethanol solutions and that it co-crystallized with CsQ [45]. However, Samhoun and co-workers studied the overall reduction of Md to the amalgam using controlled potential electrolysis they concluded that Md could not be considered a cesium-like element and no evidence was obtained consistent with a monovalent state [46,47]. Hulet et al. have recently repeated some of the co-crystallization experiments of Mikheev and performed a series of new experiments in an attempt to prepare Md by reduction with Sm in ethanol solutions and also in fused KQ media [37]. In these experiments, the behavior of Md was compared to tracer amounts of 3-i-, 2-i-, and 1-i-ions and Md consistently followed the 2 -i- ions. They concluded that Md cannot be reduced to a monovalent state with Sm as daimed by Mikheev. However, on the basis of the results of thermodynamic studies of the co-crystallization process of mendelevium with chlorides of alkali metals, the Russian investigators maintain that Md can be reduced to the monovalent state in water-ethanol solutions and that the co-crystallization of Md with salts of divalent ions can be explained as being due to the formation of mixed crystals [102,103]. An ionic radius of 1.17 A was calculated for Md from the results of the co-crystallization studies [104]. [Pg.222]

Samhoun K, David F, Hanh RL, O Kelley GD, Tarrant JR, Hobart DE (1979) Electrochemical study of mendelevium in aqueous solution no evidence of monovalent ions. J Inoig Nucl Chem 41 1749-1754... [Pg.209]


See other pages where Mendelevium studies is mentioned: [Pg.215]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.1126]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.662]    [Pg.654]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.706]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.641]    [Pg.736]    [Pg.712]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.757]    [Pg.700]    [Pg.734]    [Pg.654]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.240 ]




SEARCH



Mendelevium

© 2024 chempedia.info