Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Memory Function Formalisms

Let us compare in detail the differential theory results with those obtained for rotational relaxation kinetics from the memory function formalism (integral theory). Using R(t) from Eq. (1.107) as a kernel of Eq. (1.71) we can see that in the low-density limit... [Pg.41]

S-matrix formalism 129 memory function formalism 30-8 Mori chain 5 methane... [Pg.298]

In order to apply the memory function formalism to the collective coordinates of Eq. (367), it is necessary to define the dimensionless normalized collective coordinates,... [Pg.136]

In this article the memory function formalism has been used to compute time-correlation functions. It has been shown that a number of seemingly disparate attempts to account for the dynamical behavior of time correlation functions, such as those of Zwanzig,33,34 Mori,42,43 and Martin,16 are... [Pg.152]

However, the very first attempt to justify DET starting from the general multiparticle approach to the problem led to a surprising result it revealed the integral kinetic equation rather than differential one [33], This equation constitutes the basis of the so-called integral encounter theory (IET), which is a kind of memory function formalism often applied to transport phenomena [34] or spectroscopy [35], but never before to chemical kinetics. The memory... [Pg.109]

The general IET equations for the reversible reaction (3.92) have a form typical of memory function formalism [49,50] ... [Pg.154]

They may be obtained by means of the matrix IET but only together with the kernel E(f) = F(t) specified by its Laplace transformation (3.244), which is concentration-independent. However, from the more general point of view, Eqs. (3.707) are an implementation of the memory function formalism in chemical kinetics. The form of these equations shows the essentially non-Markovian character of the reversible reactions in solution the kernel holds the memory effect, and the convolution integrals entail the prehistoric evolution of the process. In the framework of ordinary chemical kinetics S(/j = d(t), so that the system (3.707) acquires the purely differential form. In fact, this is possible only in the limit when the reaction is entirely under kinetic control. [Pg.365]

A Hankel determinant D is a function of 2n +1 independent parameters (the moments) yet when constructed explicitly it requires a matrix with (ra -fl) elements. The problem of finding efficient algorithms, which take into account the peculiar persymmetric structure of the Hankel matrices [left diagonals of (S.13) are formed with the same element], has been considered in the literature by several authors. We discuss here in detail a recent satisfactory solution of this problem, obtained within the memory function formalism, and then compare it with other algorithms. [Pg.105]

Out of the detailed mathematical aspects, some of them summarized in this section, there is a more general physical concept at the heart of the theory of error bounds. It is a fact that the memory function formalism provides in a natural manner a framework by which Ae short-time behavior, via the kernel of the integral equations, makes its effects felt in the long-time tail. The mathematical apparatus of continued fractions can adequately describe memory effects, and this explains the central role of this tool in the theory of relaxation. [Pg.130]

Finally, we wish to note that the chain of variables defined by Eqs. (3.21) form a complete set for describing the time evolution of the initial state /o). In fact, the time evolution in a successive infinitesimal interval is determined from knowledge of /q) and - /// /o> in the next step we also need ( — i/f) /o), and so on. This is the origin of the drep relationship between the recursion method and the memory function formalism that we are going to illustrate. [Pg.149]

To establish the relation between the memory function formalism and the moments, consider the Volterra integro-differential equations (3.44) for %it) ... [Pg.154]

The memory function formalism leads to several advantages, both from a formal point of view and from a practical point of view. It makes transparent the relationship between the recursion method, the moment method, and the Lanczos metfiod on the one hand and the projective methods of nonequiUbrium statistical mechanics on the other. Also the ad hoc use of Padd iqiproximants of type [n/n +1], often adopted in the literature without true justification, now appears natural, since the approximants of the J-frac-tion (3.48) encountered in continued fraction expansions of autocorrelation functions are just of the type [n/n +1]. The mathematical apparatus of continued fractions can be profitably used to investigate properties of Green s functions and to embody in the formalism the physical information pertinent to specific models. Last but not least, the memory function formaUsm provides a new and simple PD algorithm to relate moments to continued fraction parameters. [Pg.155]

The linearized transport equations (7), the equations for the equilibrium time correlation functions (13), and the equation for collective mode spectrum (14) form a general basis for the study of the dynamic behavior of a multicomponent fluid in the memory function formalism. [Pg.114]

Since its introduction in the f960s by Zwanzig and Mori [21, 22, 23], the memory-function formalism based on projection operators has pervaded many theoretical approaches dealing with the dynamics of strongly interacting systems. Indeed, the idea of describing a many-body system by a limited number of relevant variables characterized by a relatively simple dynamics appears to be extremely appealing. [Pg.279]

In the following we shall consider the application of the memory-function formalism to the calculation of the intermediate scattering function F k,t) for simple liquids. For this purpose a natural choice for the vector A is a set of conserved variables consisting of the microscopic density and the longitudinal current density ... [Pg.282]

As mentioned in Sec. 1.1, the memory-function formalism which leads to Eq. (5.23) is, in a sense, merely a formal rephrasing of the original Eq. (5.1), shifting the difficulty in determining F k,t) to that in evaluating the memory function K k,t). A priori, the only exact result that we know about the memory function is its initial value [18, 19, 20, 25]... [Pg.283]

As we have seen so far in this section, in the theoretical development for the time-correlation functions of liquids at wavelengths and frequencies of a molecular scale, the memory-function formalism based on projection operators has played a key role. By combining this convenient framework and the interaction-site representation of molecules. [Pg.294]

The rest of this chapter is organized as follows. Section 5.2 establishes the basic theoretical framework based on the memory-function formalism... [Pg.295]

In this section the generalized Langevin equation (GLE) for density correlation functions for molecular liquids is derived based on the memory-function formalism and on the interaction-site representation. In contrast to the monatomic liquid case, all functions appearing in the GLE for polyatomic fluids take matrix forms. Approximation schemes are developed for the memory kernel by extending the successful frameworks for simple liquids described in Sec. 5.1. [Pg.296]

In this chapter we have described a theory for dynamics of polyatomic fluids based on the memory-function formalism and on the interaction-site representation of molecular liquids. Approximation schemes for memory functions appearing in the generalized Langevin equation have been developed by assuming an exponential form for memory functions and by employing the mode-coupling approach. Numerical results were presented for longitudinal current spectra of a model diatomic liquid and water, and it has been discussed how the results can be interpreted in... [Pg.344]

One further approach to the understanding of orientational correlation functions is the memory function formalism 1, 39. A memory function K(t)is defined by the equation... [Pg.296]

More quantitatively, from a detailed analysis using the memory function formalism, the characteristic parameters D and u>c can be extracted from the lineshape (25). [Pg.147]

Apart from being used to construct contracted equations of motion, projection techniques have been used to develop powerful analytic and numerical tools that erable one to solve spectral and temporal problems without resorting to the solution of global equations of motion. In this respect, we mention Mori s memory function formalism and dual Lanczos transformation theory. [Pg.286]

Mori s memory function formalism provides a framework for determining the time evolution of equilibrinm antocorrelation functions (time correlation functions describing self-correlations) and their spectral transforms for the case of classical systems. The aforementioned ambi-gnity in the interpretation of the vectors Oj and 15 Oy) in Mori s treatment of autocorrelation functions for qnantnm systems leads to mathematical difficulties. [Pg.286]

Dual Lanczos transformation theory is a projection operator approach to nonequilibrium processes that was developed by the author to handle very general spectral and temporal problems. Unlike Mori s memory function formalism, dual Lanczos transformation theory does not impose symmetry restrictions on the Liouville operator and thus applies to both reversible and irreversible systems. Moreover, it can be used to determine the time evolution of equilibrium autocorrelation functions and crosscorrelation functions (time correlation functions not describing self-correlations) and their spectral transforms for both classical and quantum systems. In addition, dual Lanczos transformation theory provides a number of tools for determining the temporal evolution of the averages of dynamical variables. Several years ago, it was demonstrated that the projection operator theories of Mori and Zwanzig represent special limiting cases of dual Lanczos transformation theory. [Pg.286]


See other pages where Memory Function Formalisms is mentioned: [Pg.5]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.563]    [Pg.563]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.197]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.149 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.37 ]




SEARCH



Memory function

The memory function formalism

© 2024 chempedia.info