MCSCF field

The Seetion on More Quantitive Aspects of Electronic Structure Calculations introduees many of the eomputational ehemistry methods that are used to quantitatively evaluate moleeular orbital and eonfiguration mixing amplitudes. The Hartree-Foek self-eonsistent field (SCF), eonfiguration interaetion (Cl), multieonfigurational SCF (MCSCF), many-body and Moller-Plesset perturbation theories. 

The multiconfigurational self-consistent field ( MCSCF) method in whiehthe expeetation value < T H T>/< T T>is treated variationally and simultaneously made stationary with respeet to variations in the Ci and Cy,i eoeffieients subjeet to the eonstraints that the spin-orbitals and the full N-eleetron waveflmetion remain normalized ... 

To illustrate how the above developments are earried out and to demonstrate how the results express the desired quantities in terms of the original wavefunetion, let us eonsider, for an MCSCF wavefunetion, the response to an external eleetrie field. In this ease, the Hamiltonian is given as the eonventional one- and two-eleetron operators to whieh the above one-eleetron eleetrie dipole perturbation V is added. The MCSCF wavefunetion P and energy E are assumed to have been obtained via the MCSCF proeedure with H=H0+ iV, where X ean be thought of as a measure of the strength of the applied eleetrie field. 

The first-order eorreetion ean be thought of as arising from the response of the wavefunetion (as eontained in its ECAO-MO and Cl amplitudes and basis funetions Xv) plus the response of the Hamiltonian to the external field. Beeause the MCSCF energy funetional has been made stationary with respeet to variations in the Cj and Ci a amplitudes, the seeond and third terms above vanish ... 

If, as is eommon, the atomie orbital bases used to earry out the MCSCF energy optimization are not explieitly dependent on the external field, the third term also vanishes beeause (9xv/3)i)o = 0. Thus for the MCSCF ease, the first-order response is given as the average value of the perturbation over the wavefunetion with X=0 ... 

A configuration interaction calculation uses molecular orbitals that have been optimized typically with a Hartree-Fock (FIF) calculation. Generalized valence bond (GVB) and multi-configuration self-consistent field (MCSCF) calculations can also be used as a starting point for a configuration interaction calculation. 

MCSCF (multiconfigurational self-consistent field) a correlated ah initio method... 

We recently proposed a new method referred to as RISM-SCF/MCSCF based on the ab initio electronic structure theory and the integral equation theory of molecular liquids (RISM). Ten-no et al. [12,13] proposed the original RISM-SCF method in 1993. The basic idea of the method is to replace the reaction field in the continuum models with a microscopic expression in terms of the site-site radial distribution functions between solute and solvent, which can be calculated from the RISM theory. Exploiting the microscopic reaction field, the Fock operator of a molecule in solution can be expressed by... 

Multiconfiguration self-consistent field (MCSCF) theory aims to optimize simultaneously the LCAO coefficients and the Cl expansion coefficients in a wavefunction such as... 

The Multi-configuration Self-consistent Field (MCSCF) method can be considered as a Cl where not only the coefficients in front of the determinants are optimized by the variational principle, but also the MOs used for constructing the determinants are made optimum. The MCSCF optimization is iterative just like the SCF procedure (if the multi-configuration is only one, it is simply HF). Since the number of MCSCF iterations required for achieving convergence tends to increase with the number of configurations included, the size of MCSCF wave function that can be treated is somewhat smaller than for Cl methods. 

A classical description of M can for example be a standard force field with (partial) atomic charges, while a quantum description involves calculation of the electronic wave function. The latter may be either a semi-empirical model, such as AMI or PM3, or any of the ab initio methods, i.e. HF, MCSCF, CISD, MP2 etc. Although the electrostatic potential can be derived directly from the electronic wave function, it is usually fitted to a set of atomic charges or multipoles, as discussed in Section 9.2, which then are used in the actual solvent model. 

The CCSD model gives for static and frequency-dependent hyperpolarizabilities usually results close to the experimental values, provided that the effects of vibrational averaging and the pure vibrational contributions have been accounted for. Zero point vibrational corrections for the static and the electric field induced second harmonic generation (ESHG) hyperpolarizability of methane have recently been calculated by Bishop and Sauer using SCF and MCSCF wavefunctions [51]. 

The Multi-Configuration Self-Consistent Field (MCSCF) method includes configurations created by excitations of electrons within an active space. Both the coefficients ca of the expansion in terms of CSFs and the expansion coefficients of the... 

The various response tensors are identified as terms in these series and are calculated using numerical derivatives of the energy. This method is easily implemented at any level of theory. Analytic derivative methods have been implemented using self-consistent-field (SCF) methods for a, ft and y, using multiconfiguration SCF (MCSCF) methods for ft and using second-order perturbation theory (MP2) for y". The response properties can also be determined in terms of sum-over-states formulation, which is derived from a perturbation theory treatment of the field operator — [iE, which in the static limit is equivalent to the results obtained by SCF finite field or analytic derivative methods. 

It is possible to divide electron correlation as dynamic and nondynamic correlations. Dynamic correlation is associated with instant correlation between electrons occupying the same spatial orbitals and the nondynamic correlation is associated with the electrons avoiding each other by occupying different spatial orbitals. Thus, the ground state electronic wave function cannot be described with a single Slater determinant (Figure 3.3) and multiconfiguration self-consistent field (MCSCF) procedures are necessary to include dynamic electron correlation. 

By calculating A.U (R) and Al/ (i ) separately, we can straightforwardly calculate the total adiabatic correction V (R) for any isotopes of A and B. The adiabatic corrections are calculated by numerical differentiation of the multi-configurational self-consistent field (MCSCF) wave functions calculated with Dalton [23]. The nurnerical differentiation was performed with the Westa program developed 1986 by Agren, Flores-Riveros and Jensen [22],... 

---