Maximum shear stress distribution

Results of detailed pressure and flash temperature distributions from two sample cases can be found in Figure 4, in comparison with those from the smooth surface solution. Subsurface stresses can also be calculated with the present computer program, and, as an example. Figure 5 illustrates the maximum shear stress distribution for the shaved surfaces, compared with that for the smooth surfaces. It has been observed from these cases that the pressure, film thickness and flash temperature... 

Sandorf, 1980 Whitney, 1985 Whitney and Browning, 1985). According to the classical beam theory, the shear stress distribution along the thickness of the specimen is a parabolic function that is symmetrical about the neutral axis where it is at its maximum and decreases toward zero at the compressive and tensile faces. In reality, however, the stress field is dominated by the stress concentration near the loading nose, which completely destroys the parabolic shear distribution used to calculate the apparent ILSS, as illustrated in Fig 3.18. The stress concentration is even more pronounced with a smaller radius of the loading nose (Cui and Wisnom, 1992) and for non-linear materials displaying substantial plastic deformation, such as Kevlar fiber-epoxy matrix composites (Davidovitz et al., 1984 Fisher et al., 1986), which require an elasto-plastic analysis (Fisher and Marom, 1984) to interpret the experimental results properly. 

This expression reflects a parabohc distribution of the stresses whose maximum value rectangular section, / = M /12 and the maximum shear stress is given by... 

To explain the influence of stress components on the fonnation of microcracking and slip line patterns, observed in the ZrBa-SiC composite, the maximum principal stress component (<7,) and the maximum shear stress component ( ) have been computed. Figure 10 shows the distribution of the... 

Figure 11. Distribution of normalized maximum shear stress in the vicinity ofindenter tip.

Distribution of von Mises (effective) stress through the thickness of a tibiai component. Note that the location of the maximum von Mises stress, which aiso corresponds to the iocation of maximum shear stress, is located at a depth of 1-2 mm from the articulating surface. The slice is taken perpendicular to the contact surface of a tibiai component at heel strike during normal gait, using the model shown in Figures 8.3A and 8.4. 

Figure 3 shows the residual stress distributions of txg and in the matrix for the case where a/b is 1/5, 1/2, and 1/1.25. The matrix is assumed to be AI2O3 and the second-phase SiC. The material properties of polycrystalline A1203 and SiC are shown in Table 1. Figure 3 suggests that the matrix with smaller a/b value has higher stress on the particle/matrix boundary, but the distributions of the maximum shear stress are almost independent of a/b. 

Figure 50 Stress distribution over the half-length of 1 cm dice bonded to ceramic substrate. Curves (a) and (a represent the maximum shearing stress in the attachment for 25 and 100 xm IP 670 adhesive layer, while curves (b) and (b show the maximum normal stress in the die for the same thicknesses.

Considering that the maximum shear stress, Tmax> assumes a parabolic distribution, the horizontal shear force corresponding to the opening of shear cracks, H, is derived by Eq. 2, presenting the following expression ... 

According to this model, the shear stress distribution is linearly increasing up to the point of its limit value, while after that point the stress remains constant. The maximum shear stress point is calculated using Eq. 2. 

A similar model is presented in the Code of Structural Interventions (2012), where the shear stress distribution with the slip is defined using two different equations, before and after half of the maximum slip value Eq. 4 (Fig. 11) ... 

---