Matrix explained

These criteria lead to different numeric transformation algorithms. The main distinction between them is orthogonal and oblique rotation. Orthogonal rotations save the structure of independent factors. Typical examples are the varimax, quartimax, and equi-max methods. Oblique rotations can lead to more useful information than orthogonal rotations but the interpretation of the results is not so straightforward. The rules about the factor loadings matrix explained above are not observed. Examples are oblimax and oblimin methods. 

Fig. 2.20. Schematic diagram showing (a) losses in the matrix explained in the text...

Discuss the elements of a time management matrix. Explain the important of this matrix. Discuss the problem of not speaking the language of the organization. 

Often the a priori knowledge about the structure of the object under restoration consists of the knowledge that it contains two or more different materials or phases of one material. Then, the problem of phase division having measured data is quite actual. To explain the mathematical formulation of this information let us consider the matrix material with binary structure and consider the following potentials ... 

We are now in a position to explain the results of Table I. As a consequence of the degeneracy of , at a conical intersection there are four degenerate functions tl/f, tb and Ttbf = Ttb = tb j. By using Eq. (Ic), an otherwise arbitrary Flermitian matrix in this four function time-reversal adapted basis has the form... 

The D matrix plays an important role in the forthcoming theory because it contains all topological features of an electronic manifold in a region surrounded by a contour F as will be explained next. 

The aim of PCA is to create a set of latent variables which is smaller than the set of original variables but still explains all the variance in the matrix X of the original variables. 

In conjunction with the discrete penalty schemes elements belonging to the Crouzeix-Raviart group arc usually used. As explained in Chapter 2, these elements generate discontinuous pressure variation across the inter-element boundaries in a mesh and, hence, the required matrix inversion in the working equations of this seheme can be carried out at the elemental level with minimum computational cost. 

Pd(II) was shown to be separated from Ni(II), Cr(III) and Co(III) by ACs completely, and only up to 3 % of Cu(II) and Fe(II) evaluate from solution together with Pd(II), this way practically pure palladium may be obtained by it s sorption from multi-component solutions. The selectivity of Pd(II) evaluation by ACs was explained by soi ption mechanism, the main part of which consists in direct interaction of Pd(II) with 7t-conjugate electron system of carbon matrix and electrons transfer from carbon to Pd(II), last one can be reduced right up to Pd in dependence on reducing capability of AC. 

Many fibrous composites are made of strong, brittle fibres in a more ductile polymeric matrix. Then the stress-strain curve looks like the heavy line in Fig. 25.2. The figure largely explains itself. The stress-strain curve is linear, with slope E (eqn. 25.1) until the matrix yields. From there on, most of the extra load is carried by the fibres which continue to stretch elastically until they fracture. When they do, the stress drops to the yield strength of the matrix (though not as sharply as the figure shows because the fibres do not all break at once). When the matrix fractures, the composite fails completely. 

A variation on the exact soiutions is the so-caiied seif-consistent modei that is explained in simpiest engineering terms by Whitney and Riiey [3-12]. Their modei has a singie hollow fiber embedded in a concentric cylinder of matrix material as in Figure 3-26. That is, only one inclusion is considered. The volume fraction of the inclusion in the composite cylinder is the same as that of the entire body of fibers in the composite material. Such an assumption is not entirely valid because the matrix material might tend to coat the fibers imperfectiy and hence ieave voids. Note that there is no association of this model with any particular array of fibers. Also recognize the similarity between this model and the concentric-cylinder model of Hashin and Rosen [3-8]. Other more complex self-consistent models include those by Hill [3-13] and Hermans [3-14] which are discussed by Chamis and Sendeckyj [3-5]. Whitney extended his model to transversely isotropic fibers [3-15] and to twisted fibers [3-16]. 

As an example of a multilayer system we reproduce, in Fig. 3, experimental TPD spectra of Cs/Ru(0001) [34,35] and theoretical spectra [36] calculated from Eq. (4) with 6, T) calculated by the transfer matrix method with M = 6 on a hexagonal lattice. In the lattice gas Hamiltonian we have short-ranged repulsions in the first layer to reproduce the (V X a/3) and p 2 x 2) structures in addition to a long-ranged mean field repulsion. Second and third layers have attractive interactions to account for condensation in layer-by-layer growth. The calculations not only successfully account for the gross features of the TPD spectra but also explain a subtle feature of delayed desorption between third and second layers. As well, the lattice gas parameters obtained by this fit reproduce the bulk sublimation energy of cesium in the third layer. 

One could assume that this characteristic behavior of the mobility of the polymers is also reflected by the typical relaxation times r of the driven chains. Indeed, in Fig. 28 we show the relaxation time T2, determined from the condition g2( Z2) = - g/3 in dependence on the field B evidently, while for B < B t2 is nearly constant (or rises very slowly), for B > Be it grows dramatically. This result, as well as the characteristic variation of with B (cf. Figs. 27(a-c)), may be explained, at least phenomenologically, if the motion of a polymer chain through the host matrix is considered as consisting of (i) nearly free drift from one obstacle to another, and (ii) a period of trapping, r, of the molecule at the next obstacle. If the mean distance between obstacles is denoted by ( and the time needed by the chain to travel this distance is /, then - (/ t + /), whereby from Eq. (57) / = /Vq — k T/ DqBN). This gives a somewhat better approximation for the drift velocity... 

Til explain later how we characterize such surfaces you might have noticed that (1.45) can be written as the determinant of a matrix H called the Hessian... 

---