Mass transfer penetration model

Other Models for Mass Transfer. In contrast to the film theory, other approaches assume that transfer of material does not occur by steady-state diffusion. Rather there are large fluid motions which constantiy bring fresh masses of bulk material into direct contact with the interface. According to the penetration theory (33), diffusion proceeds from the interface into the particular element of fluid in contact with the interface. This is an unsteady state, transient process where the rate decreases with time. After a while, the element is replaced by a fresh one brought to the interface by the relative movements of gas and Uquid, and the process is repeated. In order to evaluate a constant average contact time T for the individual fluid elements is assumed (33). This leads to relations such as... 

The predictions of correlations based on the film model often are nearly identical to predictions based on the penetration and surface-renewal models. Thus, in view of its relative simphcity, the film model normally is preferred for purposes of discussion or calculation. It should be noted that none of these theoretical models has proved adequate for maldug a priori predictions of mass-transfer rates in packed towers, and therefore empirical correlations such as those outlined later in Table 5-28. must be employed. 

In 1963 and in 1965, Huang and Kuo (H18, H19) applied the film penetration model to the mechanism of simultaneous mass transfer and chemical reaction. 

For mass transfer with irreversible and reversible reactions, the film-penetration model is a more general concept than the film or surface renewal models which are its limiting cases. 

As an example, it may be supposed that in phase 1 there is a constant finite resistance to mass transfer which can in effect be represented as a resistance in a laminar film, and in phase 2 the penetration model is applicable. Immediately after surface renewal has taken place, the mass transfer resistance in phase 2 will be negligible and therefore the whole of the concentration driving force will lie across the film in phase 1. The interface compositions will therefore correspond to the bulk value in phase 2 (the penetration phase). As the time of exposure increases, the resistance to mass transfer in phase 2 will progressively increase and an increasing proportion of the total driving force will lie across this phase. Thus the interface composition, initially determined by the bulk composition in phase 2 (the penetration phase) will progressively approach the bulk composition in phase 1 as the time of exposure increases. 

HARRIOTT 25 suggested that, as a result of the effects of interfaeial tension, the layers of fluid in the immediate vicinity of the interface would frequently be unaffected by the mixing process postulated in the penetration theory. There would then be a thin laminar layer unaffected by the mixing process and offering a constant resistance to mass transfer. The overall resistance may be calculated in a manner similar to that used in the previous section where the total resistance to transfer was made up of two components—a Him resistance in one phase and a penetration model resistance in the other. It is necessary in equation 10.132 to put the Henry s law constant equal to unity and the diffusivity Df in the film equal to that in the remainder of the fluid D. The driving force is then CAi — CAo in place of C Ao — JPCAo, and the mass transfer rate at time t is given for a film thickness L by ... 

Kishinev ski/23 has developed a model for mass transfer across an interface in which molecular diffusion is assumed to play no part. In this, fresh material is continuously brought to the interface as a result of turbulence within the fluid and, after exposure to the second phase, the fluid element attains equilibrium with it and then becomes mixed again with the bulk of the phase. The model thus presupposes surface renewal without penetration by diffusion and therefore the effect of diffusivity should not be important. No reliable experimental results are available to test the theory adequately. 

In a process where mass transfer takes place across a phase boundary, the same theoretical approach can be applied to each of the phases, though it does not follow that the same theory is best applied to both phases. For example, the film model might be applicable to one phase and the penetration model to the other. This problem is discussed in the previous section. 

Given that, from the penetration theory for mass transfer across an interface, the instantaneous rale ol mass transfer is inversely proportional to the square root of the time of exposure, obtain a relationship between exposure lime in the Higbie mode and surface renewal rate in the Danckwerts model which will give the same average mass transfer rate. The age distribution function and average mass transfer rate from the Danckwerts theory must be deri ved from first principles. 

In calculating Ihe mass transfer rate from the penetration theory, two models for the age distribution of the surface elements are commonly used — those due to Higbie and to Danckwerts, Explain the difference between the two models and give examples of situations in which each of them would be appropriate. 

In the Danckwerts model, it is assumed that elements of the surface have an age distribution ranging from zero to infinity. Obtain the age distribution function for this model and apply it to obtain the average, mass Iransfer coefficient at the surface, given that from the penetration theory the mass transfer coefficient for surface of age t is VlD/(7rt, where D is the diffusivity. 

It may be assumed that the penetration model may be used to represent the mass transfer process. The depth of penetration is small compared with the radius of the droplets and the effects of surface curvature may he neglected. From the penetration theory, the concentration C, at a depth y below the surface at time r is given by ... 

The experimental results imply that the main reaction (eq. 1) is an equilibrium reaction and first order in nitrogen monoxide and iron chelate. The equilibrium constants at various temperatures were determined by modeling the experimental NO absorption profile using the penetration theory for mass transfer. Parameter estimation using well established numerical methods (Newton-Raphson) allowed detrxmination of the equilibrium constant (Fig. 1) as well as the ratio of the diffusion coefficients of Fe"(EDTA) andNO[3]. 

On the basis of the simplified view of the flow patterns just described, a model for predicting mass transfer rates can be developed using penetration theory and the fact that mass is transferred simultaneously from both the nip and the wiped film. We can therefore write that the total molar mass transfer rate from an element of fluid over a length dk in the extruder is... 

A factor closely related to the catalyst loading is the efficiency or utilization of the electrode. This tells how much of the electrode is actually being used for electrochemical reaction and can also be seen as a kind of penetration depth. To examine ohmic and mass-transfer effects, sometimes an effectiveness factor, E, is used. This is defined as the actual rate of reaction divided by the rate of reaction without any transport (ionic or reactant) losses. With this introduction of the parameters and equations, the various modeling approaches can be discussed. 

Turbulent mass transfer near a wall can be represented by various physical models. In one such model the turbulent flow is assumed to be composed of a succession of short, steady, laminar motions along a plate. The length scale of the laminar path is denoted by x0 and the velocity of the liquid element just arrived at the wall by u0. Along each path of length x0, the motion is approximated by the quasi-steady laminar flow of a semiinfinite fluid along a plate. This implies that the hydrodynamic and diffusion boundary layers which develop in each of the paths are assumed to be smaller than the thickness of the fluid elements brought to the wall by turbulent fluctuations. Since the diffusion coefficient is small in liquids, the depth of penetration by diffusion in the liquid element is also small. Therefore one can use the first terms in the Taylor expansion of the Blasius expressions for the velocity components. The rate of mass transfer in the laminar microstructure can be obtained by solving the equation... 

In 1951,Danckwerts [4] proposed the surface renewal model as an extension ofthe penetration model. Instead of assuming a fixed contact time for all fluid elements, Danckwerts assumed a wide distribution of contact time, from zero to infinity, and supposed that the chance of an element ofthe surface being replaced with fresh liquid was independent of the length of time for which it has been exposed. Then, it was shown, theoretically, that the averaged mass transfer coefficient at the interface is given as... 

It can be seen that a theoretical prediction of values is not possible by any of the three above-described models, because none of the three parameters - the laminar film thickness in the film model, the contact time in the penetration model, and the fractional surface renewal rate in the surface renewal model - is predictable in general. It is for this reason that the empirical correlations must normally be used for the predictions of individual coefficients of mass transfer. Experimentally obtained values of the exponent on diffusivity are usually between 0.5 and 1.0. 

Penetration theory (Higbie, 1935)assumes that turbulent eddies travel from the bulk of the phase to the interface where they remain for a constant exposure time te. The solute is assumed to penetrate into a given eddy during its stay at the interface by a process of unsteady-state molecular diffusion. This model predicts that the mass-transfer coefficient is directly proportional to the square root of molecular diffusivity... 

Considering homogeneous RSPs, mass transfer at the gas/vapor/liquid-liquid interface can be described using different theoretical concepts (57,59). Most often the two-film model (87) or the penetration/surface renewal model (27,88) is used, in which the model parameters are estimated via experimental correlations. In this respect the two-film model is advantageous since there is a broad spectrum of correlations available in the literature, for all types of internals and systems. For the penetration/surface renewal model, such a choice is limited. 

Toor, R. L. and Marchello, J. M. (1958). Film-Penetration Model for Mass and Heat Transfer. AlChE J., 4,97. 

In most common separation processes, the main mass transfer is across an interface between a gas and a liquid or between two liquid phases. At fluid-fluid interfaces, turbulence may persist to the interface. A simple theoretical model for turbulent mass transfer to or from a fluid-phase boundary was suggested in 1904 by Nernst, who postulated that the entire resistance to mass transfer in a given turbulent phase lies in a thin, stagnant region of that phase at the interface, called a him, hence the name film theory.2 4,5 Other, more detailed, theories for describing the mass transfer through a fluid-fluid interface exist, such as the penetration theory.1,4... 

We studied these phenomena experimentally in a wetted wall column and two stirred cell reactors and evaluated the results with both a penetration and a film model description of simultaneous mass transfer accompanied by complex liquid-phase reactions [5,6], The experimental results agree well with the calculations and the existence of the third regime with its desorption against overall driving force is demonstrated in practice (forced desorption or negative enhancement factor). 

The removal of the acid components H2S and CO2 from gases by means of alkanolamine solutions is a well-established process. The description of the H2S and CO2 mass transfer fluxes in this process, however, is very complicated due to reversible and, moreover, interactive liquid-phase reactions hence the relevant penetration model based equations cannot be solved analytically [6], Recently we, therefore, developed a numerical technique in order to calculate H2S and CO2 mass transfer rates from the model equations [6]. 

In this investigation we carried out experiments with simultaneous absorption of H2S and CO2 into aqueous 2.0 M diisopropanol-amine (DIPA) solutions at 25 °C. The results are evaluated by means of our mathematical mass transfer model both in penetration and film theory form. The latter version has been derived from the penetration theory mass transfer model [5],... 

The mass transfer model. In our previous work [6] the mass transfer model equations and their mathematical treatment have been described extensively. The relevant differential equations, describing the process of liquid-phase diffusion and simultaneous reactions of the species according to the penetration theory, are summarized in table 1. Recently we derived from this penetration theory description a film model version, which is incorporated in the evaluation of the experimental results. Details on the film model version are given elsewhere [5]. 

---