Marcus electron transfer rate

Early studies showed tliat tire rates of ET are limited by solvation rates for certain barrierless electron transfer reactions. However, more recent studies showed tliat electron-transfer rates can far exceed tire rates of diffusional solvation, which indicate critical roles for intramolecular (high frequency) vibrational mode couplings and inertial solvation. The interiDlay between inter- and intramolecular degrees of freedom is particularly significant in tire Marcus inverted regime [45] (figure C3.2.12)). 

In the strong-coupling limit at high temperatures the electron transfer rate constant is given by the Marcus formula [Marcus 1964]... 

Both Marcus27 and Hush28 have addressed electron transfer rates, and have given detailed mathematical developments. Marcus s approach has resulted in an important equation that bears his name. It is an expression for the rate constant of a net electron transfer (ET) expressed in terms of the electron exchange (EE) rate constants of the two partners. The k for ET is designated kAS, and the two k s for EE are kAA and bb- We write the three reactions as follows ... 

Figure 42. Scheme comparing expected potential-independent charge-transfer rates from Marcus-Gerischer theory of interfacia) electron transfer (left) with possible mechanisms for explaining the experimental observation of potential-dependent electron-transfer rates (right) a potential-dependent concentration of surface states, or a charge-transfer rate that depends on the thermodynamic force (electric potential difference) in the interface. 

Figure 23. Arrhenius plot of the electron transfer rate. The electronic coupling strength is TIad = 0.0001 a.u. Solid line-Bixon-Jortner perturbation theory Ref. [109]. FuU-circle present results of Eq. (26 ). Dashed line-results of Marcus s high temperature theory [Eq.(129)]. Taken from Ref. [28].

According to the Marcus theory [9], the electron transfer rate depends upon the reaction enthalpy (AG), the electronic coupling (V) and the reorganization energy (A). By changing the electron donor and the bridge we measured the influence of these parameters on the charge transfer rate. The re-... 

In summary, to apply the Marcus theory of electron transfer, it is necessary to see if the temperature dependence of the electron transfer rate constant can be described by a function of the Arrhenius form. When this is valid, one can then determine the activation energy AEa only under this condition can we use AEa to determine if the parabolic dependence on AG/ is valid and if the reaction coordinate is defined. 

It has been shown so far that internal and external factors can be combined in the control of the electron-transfer rate. Although in most cases a simple theoretical treatment, e.g. by the Marcus approach, is prevented by the coincidence of these factors, it is clear that the observed features for the isoenergetic self-exchange differ by the electronic coupling and the free energy of activation. Then it is also difficult to separate the inner- and outer-sphere reorganization energies. 

Electron Transfer Far From Equilibrium. We have shown how the Marcus Theory of electron transfer provides a quantitative means of analysis of outer-sphere mechanisms in both homogeneous and heterogeneous systems. It is particularly useful for predicting electron transfer rates near the equilibrium potential,... 

In most cases, when the driving force is lower than the reorganization energy, the electron transfer rate increases when the driving force AG0 is increased. There is, however, the so-called Marcus inversion region (—AG0>A), such that the larger the driving force, the lower the electron transfer rate. 

Figure 6.24 Marcus theory predictions of the dependence of the electron-transfer rate on the thermodynamic driving force...

Fig. 1. The Marcus parabolic free energy surfaces corresponding to the reactant electronic state of the system (DA) and to the product electronic state of the system (D A ) cross (become resonant) at the transition state. The curves which cross are computed with zero electronic tunneling interaction and are known as the diabatic curves, and include the Born-Oppenheimer potential energy of the molecular system plus the environmental polarization free energy as a function of the reaction coordinate. Due to the finite electronic coupling between the reactant and charge separated states, a fraction k l of the molecular systems passing through the transition state region will cross over onto the product surface this electronically controlled fraction k l thus enters directly as a factor into the electron transfer rate constant...

In the previous section, we alluded to the Franck Condon factors (FCF) in controlling electron transfer rates. For this topic, detailed reviews of theory and experiment are provided elsewhere. In sum, it is now well known that the reaction free energy required to transfer charge can be reduced by the reaction free energy, AG°, as summarized in the famous Marcus equation AG = (AG° — where X, the reorganization energy, is related to the degree of... 

Early attempts at observing electron transfer in metalloproteins utilized redox-active metal complexes as external partners. The reactions were usually second-order and approaches based on the Marcus expression allowed, for example, conjectures as to the character and accessibility of the metal site. xhe agreement of the observed and calculated rate constants for cytochrome c reactions for example is particularly good, even ignoring work terms. The observations of deviation from second-order kinetics ( saturation kinetics) allowed the dissection of the observed rate constant into the components, namely adduct stability and first-order electron transfer rate constant (see however Sec. 1.6.4). Now it was a little easier to comment on the possible site of attack on the proteins, particularly when a number of modifications of the proteins became available. 

The further improvement of the product yield (100%) was achieved by employing AcrPh + instead of AcrH + and this can also be ascribed to the slower back-electron transfer rate for the former than the latter [109]. In the Marcus-inverted region, the back-electron transfer becomes slower with increasing the driving force. Because the EZx value of AcrPh" (E°x versus SCE = - 0.55 V)... 

The inverted region was initially predicted by Marcus and the decrease in the electron transfer rate constant with —AG° has been observed experimentally many times.18 This is an important and remarkable result both for natural and artificial photosynthesis and energy conversion it predicts that, following electron transfer quenching of the excited A -B, the back electron transfer in the inverted region for the charge-separated state A + -B becomes slower as the energy stored increases. 

Figure 11 Plot of the log of the electron transfer rate as a function of the driving force. Also shown is a Marcus theory curve calculated from Eq. (8), taking V = 2.12 cm and X = 3225 cm . ...

Probably the most important outcome of the Marcus theory is the relationship between homogeneous homonuclear (fcs) and heterogeneous electron transfer rate coefficients (feei) after corrections for electrostatic work terms... 

---