Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Manhattan metrics

The matching is done in two steps. First, a so-called distance is computed between the single elements of Request and Offer Vectors. For that purpose, a set of rules was defined [265] to consider all roles which can be specified for one element. The result of this computation is a vector of differences between the client s demands on certain quality aspects and a server s capabilities. A number of distance functions on vectors are well-known in analysis, especially the maximum, Euclidean, and Manhattan metrics. Those were integrated to map the difference vectors to scalar values, assessing the usefulness of a service for the client s demands. Minimization over the values for all available service instances returns the best fitting service, and the client can start using this service directly. [Pg.410]

Bicego used the similarity-based representation of electronic nose measurements for odor classification with the SVM method.In the similarity-based representation, the raw data from sensors are transformed into pairwise (dis)similarities, i.e., distances between objects in the dataset. The electronic nose is an array of eight carbon black-polymer detectors. The system was tested for the recognition of 2-propanol, acetone, and ethanol, with 34 experiments for each compound. Two series of 102 experiments were performed, the first one with data recorded after 10 minutes of exposure, whereas in the second group of experiments, the data were recorded after 1 second of exposure. The one-versus-one cross-validation accuracy of the first group of experiments was 99% for similarity computed using the Euclidean metric. For the second group of experiments, the accuracy was 79% for the Euclidean metric and 80% for the Manhattan metric. [Pg.383]

Distances with C = 1 are especially useful in the classification of local data as simple as in Fig. 5-12, where simply d( 1, 2) = a + b. They are also known as Manhattan, city block, or taxi driver metrics. These distances describe an absolute distance and may be easily understood. With C = 2 the distance of Eq. 5-7, the EUCLIDean distance, is obtained. If one approaches infinity, C = oo, in the maximum metric the measurement pairs with the greatest difference will have the greatest weight. This metric is, therefore, suitable in outlier recognition. [Pg.154]

Minkowski metric with k = 1. The shortest path from a to b walking on a co-ordinate axis. Named for the streets of Manhattan, which resemble a co-ordinate axis... [Pg.543]

The entrance of the U.S. into World War II redirected quickly the pursuit of nuclear studies. Many of those afiiliated with Lawrence at Berkeley became attached to the Manhattan Project (17,18), Libby, on leave from Berkeley, interrupted his tenure as a Guggenheim Fellow at Princeton to join the Manhattan project group at Golumbia University. When not occupied with the principal matter at hand, he continued to investigate aspects of radiocarbon chemistry. One obvious issue was the question of the Kalf-life. The initial estimates were based on values which varied by an order of magnitude or more. Attempts to obtain more precise estimates were thus very much in order. Unfortunately, the values obtained (26,000 13,000 and 21,000 4,000 years) were, in retrospect, seriously in error (19), Only with the use of mass spectro-metric data to determine the isotopic composition of the samples used in the experiments would more accurate values become available. [Pg.37]

Two popular distance metrics are the Manhattan distance metric (r = 1), which represents the sum of the absolute descriptor differences, and the ultrametric (r = °o), which represents the maximum absolute descriptor difference. Both the Manhattan and Euclidean distance metrics obey all four metric properties. [Pg.138]

The experiment headed by Fermi attempted to stage the first controlled chain reaction. To produce the reaction, the Manhattan Project took over an indoor squash court located under the Sta Field stands, where the scientists constructed what they called Chicago Pile Number One (CP-1). CP-1 consisted of some 46 tons (42 metric tons) of... [Pg.36]

Uranium s highly volatile properties suggested to Fermi that neutrons in the uranium atom could be prompted to separate from their nuclei. However, because uranium can emit neutrons, it is very unstable. And so the Manhattan Project scientists enclosed the uranium in a mass of bricks made out of graphite—some 380 tons (345 metric tons) had to be employed. The graphite absorbed the uranium neutrons to a degree, essentially slowing them down. When it was ready for the eiqieriment, the CP-1 stood some 26 feet (8 m) high. [Pg.36]

One of the most intuitive ways to describe how cluster analysis works in practice is by referring to the agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) method. Beside the common preliminary steps already discussed, that is definition of the metric (Euclidean, Mahalanobis, Manhattan distance, etc.) and calculation of the distance matrix and the corresponding similarity matrix, the analysis continues according to a recursive procedure such as... [Pg.133]


See other pages where Manhattan metrics is mentioned: [Pg.3]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.40]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.154 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info