Macrophase separation, copolymer

Fig.49 Composition distribution dependence of reduced domain spacing, D/D0, of PS- -P2VP with single microphase-separated structure. Do = 60.8 nm is domain spacing of parent copolymer with Mn = 125 kg/mol. Hatched region macrophase separation. From [160], Copyright 2003 American Chemical Society...

The effect of blending an AB diblock copolymer with an A-type homopolymer has been the subject of many research activities. On a theoretical basis the subject was investigated e.g. by Whitmore and Noolandi [172] and Mat-sen [173]. If a diblock exhibiting lamellae morphology is blended with a homopolymer of high molecular weight, macrophase separation between the... 

Molecular architecture modifies the phase behavior of block copolymers. In block copolymers, macrophase separation is prevented by the connectivity of the polymer chains. The transition from a homogeneous melt to a heteroge-... 

In binary blends of A homopolymer and AB diblock copolymer, the interplay between microphase separation and macrophase separation is controlled mainly by the relative length of the chains, in addition to the composition of the mixture. Homopolymers shorter than the corresponding block tend to be solubilized within the corresponding domain of a microphase-separated structure. As the homopolymer molecular weight increases to approach that of the corresponding... 

In a blend of immiscible homopolymers, macrophase separation is favoured on decreasing the temperature in a blend with an upper critical solution temperature (UCST) or on increasing the temperature in a blend with a lower critical solution temperature (LCST). Addition of a block copolymer leads to competition between this macrophase separation and microphase separation of the copolymer. From a practical viewpoint, addition of a block copolymer can be used to suppress phase separation or to compatibilize the homopolymers. Indeed, this is one of the main applications of block copolymers. The compatibilization results from the reduction of interfacial tension that accompanies the segregation of block copolymers to the interface. From a more fundamental viewpoint, the competing effects of macrophase and microphase separation lead to a rich critical phenomenology. In addition to the ordinary critical points of macrophase separation, tricritical points exist where critical lines for the ternary system meet. A Lifshitz point is defined along the line of critical transitions, at the crossover between regimes of macrophase separation and microphase separation. This critical behaviour is discussed in more depth in Chapter 6. 

Turbidometry is simply the quantitative measurement of light transmission in turbid solutions, and is employed to locate the cloud point (i.e. onset of macrophase separation) in block copolymer solutions, as discussed in Chapter 3. 

In blends of two or more homopolymers with block copolymer, there is an interplay between macrophase separation of the homopolymers and microphase separation of the block copolymer. Which effect predominates depends on the relative lengths of the polymers, and on the composition of the blend. 

Binary blends of block copolymers can also macrophase separate if the mismatch in molecular weights is sufficient. In the other limit, blends of diblocks of... 

Fig. 6.2 Representative micrographs showing macrophase separation (Lowenhaupt and Hellmann 1991) (a) and (b) are bicontinuous structure, typical of those for spinodal decomposition (c) and (d) show discrete domains, consistent with a nucleation and growth process of macrophase separation. The diblock details are as Fig. 6.1, the homopolymer has A/w = 161 kg mol-1. Temperatures and volume fraction of copolymer are indicated.

Macrophase separation after microphase separation has been observed in an AB block copolymer/homopolymer C blend (Hashimoto et al 1995). Blends of a PS-PB starblock copolymer (75wt% PS) and PVME homopolymer were prepared by solvent casting. Binary blends of PS and PVME exhibit a lower critical solution temperature (LCST), i.e. they demix at high temperatures. The initial structure of a 50% mixture of a PS-PB diblock and PVME shown in Fig. 6.20(a) consists of worm-like micelles. Heating led to macrophase separation as evident... 

Until recently, very little quantitative information was available on blends of block copolymers. The literature is summarized in Table 6.3. Hoffman et al. (1970) reported microscopic demixing of blends of PS-PB diblocks, with two maxima in the domain size distribution, but with no evidence tor macrophase separation. These findings must be treated with caution in the light of more recent results. Hadziioannou and Skoulios (1982) used SAXS and SANS to investigate the morphology of binary blends of PS-PI diblocks, and binary PS-PI/PS-PI-PS or PS-PI/PI-PS-PI blends or blends of the two types of triblock. They found that the blends were microphase separated, and that the sharpness of the interface was not reduced in blends compared to neat copolymers. The transition between a lamellar and a cylindrical structure was shown to depend primarily on blend composition. In contrast, the transition from a lamellar to a disordered phase at... 

UsingTEM to identify blend morphology, two diblocks with/ps 0.8 that form cubic-packed spherical phases and cylindrical phases respectively in the pure copolymer were found not to macrophase separate in a blend with d = 2.2, but to form single domain structures (cylinders or spheres) in the blend (Koizumi et al. 1994c). Similarly, blending a diblock with fK = 0.26 with one with fK = 0.64 (d = 1.2) led to uniform microphase-separated structures, with a lamellar phase induced in the 50 50 blend. Vilesov et al. (1994) also observed that blending two PS-PB diblocks with approximately inverse compositions (i.e. 22wt% PS and 72 wt% PS) induces a lamellar phase in the 50 50 blend. These examples all correspond to case (i). 

The phase behaviour of blends of homopolymers containing block copolymers is governed by a competition between macrophase separation of the homopolymer and microphase separation of the block copolymers. The former occurs at a wavenumber q = 0, whereas the latter is characterized by q + 0. The locus of critical transitions at q, the so-called X line, is divided into q = 0 and q + 0 branches by the (isotropic) Lifshitz point. The Lifshitz point can be described using a simple Landau-Ginzburg free-energy functional for a scalar order parameter rp(r), which for ternary blends containing block copolymers is the total volume fraction of, say, A monomers. The free energy density can be written (Selke 1992)... 

A line of ordinary critical points for macrophase separation is shown as the line CA B in Fig. 6.42 for a ternary blend of two homopolymers with equal degrees of polymerization and a diblock copolymer at high temperature. Four regimes have been identified by Broseta and Fredrickson (1990) and are indicated in... 

---