Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Linear VSEPR structure

A molecule with only two atoms attached to the central atom is BeCl2. The Lewis structure is CI — Be — CE, and there are no lone pairs on the central atom. To be as far apart as possible, the two bonding pairs lie on opposite sides of the Be atom, and so the electron arrangement is linear. Because a Cl atom is attached by each bonding pair, the VSEPR model predicts a linear shape for the BeCL molecule, with a bond angle of 180° (4). That shape is confirmed by experiment. [Pg.221]

According to VSEPR theory, the most stable arrangement of the three lone pairs of electrons would be in the equatorial position, as shown in (1), where they would be less crowded. Therefore, a linear structure is the correct molecular geometry of the molecule. [Pg.117]

The final cu-bonded formulas (3.213), (3.214), and (3.219)-(3.221) bear an obvious resemblance to the usual VSEPR representations of these hypervalent species. Indeed, each cu-bonded structure has the same number of formal bond pairs (bp) and lone pairs (lp) as the VSEPR representation. Furthermore, the predicted angular geometries of the two models are essentially identical, with the linear (or near-linear) cu-bonded ligands occupying axial positions in the SN2-like trigonal bipyramidal motif. [Pg.297]

D—SiC, is tetrahedral. BrF4 is square planar. C2H2 is linear. TeF6 is octahedral. N03 is trigonal planar. If you are uncertain about any of these, Lewis structures and VSEPR are needed. [Pg.161]

The CNN unit is linear in A and B, but bent in C according to VSEPR. This is an example of how VSEPR can fail when comparing resonance structures. [Pg.12]

The Lewis structure reveals a VSEPR number of 5 for the central iodine atom, two bonded neighbors and three unshared pairs. To determine which corners of the trigonal bipyramid are occupied by the terminal iodine atoms, find the arrangement which maximizes the angles between the unshared pairs. The preferred arrangement, Fig. 9-45(a), must be the one in which the unshared pairs are all at 120° because any other alternative [Fig. 9-45(b) and (c)] would have two sets of pairs at 90°. Therefore, the two terminal iodine atoms must occupy the axial positions (180° to each other), making the molecule linear. [Pg.155]

Now, what about carbon dioxide Well, when we draw a Lewis structure of carbon dioxide, and consider VSEPR theory, we arrive at a linear molecule, as illustrated in Figure 7.15. Each C-O bond is polarized towards the oxygen. However, the two bond dipoles are pointing in exactly opposite directions, and cancel each other out. Therefore, carbon dioxide is a nonpolar molecule. [Pg.165]

The VSEPR model for predicting structure does not work for complex ions. However, we can safely assume that a complex ion with a coordination number of 6 has an octahedral arrangement of ligands, and that complexes with two ligands are linear. On the other hand, complex ions with a coordination number of 4 can be either tetrahedral or square planar there is no reliable way to predict which will occur in a particular case. [Pg.956]

Several of these compounds and ions have interesting structures which have provided tests for models of bonding. For example, structures of the xenon fluorides have been interpreted on the basis of the VSEPR model (Figure 8-31). Xep2 and Xep4 have structures entirely in accord with their VSEPR descriptions Xep2 is linear (three lone pairs on Xe) and Xep4 is planar (two lone pairs). [Pg.293]

When we are to determine how many electron groups that surround an atom, the Lewis structure can be of great help (see the previous section 2.23 Lewis structure). From the Lewis structure of a given molecule you can simply count how many bonds and lone pairs that surround an atom. That way you have the number of electron groups. The VSEPR theoiy tells us that these electron groups will be placed as far apart as possible. In the following example we will use the VSEPR theory to predict the molecular geometries of a water molecule and a carbon dioxide molecule. That way we will discover why a carbon dioxide molecule is linear and why a water molecule is V-shaped. [Pg.67]

The VSEPR theory has thus served as a tool that enabled us to explain why a carbon dioxide molecule is linear and why a water molecule is V-shaped. The VSEPR theory is a simple and usable tool to predict geometries of molecules when the Eewis structure is already available giving us the number of electron groups. [Pg.69]

When structures are determined by diffraction methods, atom positions are located. Thus, in terms of a structural descriptor XeF2 is linear and [XeF5] is pentagonal planar. In the diagrams above we show two representations of each species, one with the lone pairs to emphasize the origin of the prediction from the VSEPR model. [Pg.47]


See other pages where Linear VSEPR structure is mentioned: [Pg.89]    [Pg.5331]    [Pg.5330]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.956]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.1122]    [Pg.956]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.944]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.841]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.496]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.6]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.21 ]




SEARCH



Linear structure

Structure VSEPR

VSEPR

VSEPR model linear structures

© 2024 chempedia.info