Lewis acids chelating reagents

An excess of Grignard reagent (4 equivalents) or the addition of strong Lewis acids promotes the preference for chelation-controlled. vvn-products (Table 20)22 21 u. In addition, the use of diethyl ether or dichloromethane instead of tetrahydrofuran improves the yield of the chelation-derived syn-product24. 

Allyltrialkoxy- or -tris(dialkylamino)titanium reagents are not capable of chelation-controlled addition reactions with oxy- or amino-substituted carbonyl compounds due to their low Lewis acidity87. To attain chelation control, the application of allylsilanes (Section 1.3.3.3.5.2.2.) and allylstannanes (Section I.3.3.3.6.I.3.2.) in the presence of bidentate Lewis acids like titanium(IV) chloride, tin(lV) chloride or magnesium bromide are the better options. 

With titanium enolates it was found that use of excess (3 equiv.) of the titanium reagent reversed facial selectivity of oxazolidinone enolates.140 This was attributed to generation of a chelated TS in the presence of the excess Lewis acid. The chelation rotates the oxazolidinone ring and reverses the facial preference, while retaining the Z-configuration syn diastereoselectivity. 

These examples and those in Scheme 2.6 illustrate the key variables that determine the stereochemical outcome of aldol addition reactions using chiral auxiliaries. The first element that has to be taken into account is the configuration of the ring system that is used to establish steric differentiation. Then the nature of the TS, whether it is acyclic, cyclic, or chelated must be considered. Generally for boron enolates, reaction proceeds through a cyclic but nonchelated TS. With boron enolates, excess Lewis acid can favor an acyclic TS by coordination with the carbonyl electrophile. Titanium enolates appear to be somewhat variable but can be shifted to chelated TSs by use of excess reagent and by auxiliaries such as oxazolidine-2-thiones that enhance the tendency to chelation. Ultimately, all of the factors play a role in determining which TS is favored. 

TS, which is usually based on the chair (Zimmerman-Traxler) model. This pattern is particularly prevalent for the allylic borane reagents, where the Lewis acidity of boron promotes a tight cyclic TS, but at the same time limits the possibility of additional chelation. The dominant factors in these cases are the E- or Z-configuration of the allylic reagent and the conformational preferences of the reacting aldehyde (e.g., a Felkin-type preference.)... 

Aldol addition and related reactions of enolates and enolate equivalents are the subject of the first part of Chapter 2. These reactions provide powerful methods for controlling the stereochemistry in reactions that form hydroxyl- and methyl-substituted structures, such as those found in many antibiotics. We will see how the choice of the nucleophile, the other reagents (such as Lewis acids), and adjustment of reaction conditions can be used to control stereochemistry. We discuss the role of open, cyclic, and chelated transition structures in determining stereochemistry, and will also see how chiral auxiliaries and chiral catalysts can control the enantiose-lectivity of these reactions. Intramolecular aldol reactions, including the Robinson annulation are discussed. Other reactions included in Chapter 2 include Mannich, carbon acylation, and olefination reactions. The reactivity of other carbon nucleophiles including phosphonium ylides, phosphonate carbanions, sulfone anions, sulfonium ylides, and sulfoxonium ylides are also considered. 

Indolizidine alkaloids. The key step in a new stereocontrolled synthesis of these alkaloids, such as castanospermine (5), depends upon the diastereoselective reaction of an azagluco aldehyde with allylmetal reagents catalyzed by Lewis acids (12, 21-22). Thus reaction of allyltrimethylsilane with the aldehyde 1 and TiCL, (excess) in CH2C12 at - 85° results in the product 2, formed by selective chelation of the ot-amino aldehydo group with TiCl4. The product can be converted into 5... 

Extension of the scope of the method by full control of the stereoselectivity failed because the use of Lewis acids as chelating agents to induce the syn addition of 25a to aldehydes produced instead a substantia] desilylation of the reagent. A remedy to this limitation was provided by the conversion of the anti adduct into the syn isomer by an oxidation-reduction sequence [43J (Scheme 10). 

---