Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Lewis acid-base reactions, definition

Many of the d-block elements form characteristically colored solutions in water. For example, although solid copper(II) chloride is brown and copper(II) bromide is black, their aqueous solutions are both light blue. The blue color is due to the hydrated copper(II) ions, [Cu(H20)fJ2+, that form when the solids dissolve. As the formula suggests, these hydrated ions have a specific composition they also have definite shapes and properties. They can be regarded as the outcome of a reaction in which the water molecules act as Lewis bases (electron pair donors, Section 10.2) and the Cu2+ ion acts as a Lewis acid (an electron pair acceptor). This type of Lewis acid-base reaction is characteristic of many cations of d-block elements. [Pg.788]

According to the Lewis definition, an acid is an electron pair acceptor and a base is an electron pair donor. All Bronsted-Lowry bases are also Lewis bases. However, Lewis acids include many species that are not proton acids instead of H+, they have some other electron-deficient species that acts as the electron pair acceptor. An example of a Lewis acid-base reaction is provided by the following equation. In this reaction the boron of BF3 is electron/deficient (it has only six electrons in its valence shell). The oxygen of the ether is a Lewis base and uses a pair of electrons to form a bond to the boron, thus completing boron s octet. [Pg.106]

The Lewis acid-base definitions include reactions having nothing to do with protons. Following are some examples of Lewis acid-base reactions. Notice that the common Br0nsted-Lowry acids and bases also fall under the Lewis definition, with a proton serving as the electrophile. Curved arrows (red) are used to show the movement of electrons, generally from the nucleophile to the electrophile. [Pg.31]

The next step involves the addition of nonanoyl chloride and is also understood using the Lewis definition. The carbonyl (C = 0) group on nonanoyl chloride is very polar, yielding an electron-deficient carbon, which is then a Lewis acid. The negative cholesterol ion is an electron donor, or Lewis base, and reacts with the positive carbon center to form a new bond and release a chloride ion. This chloride ion is then neutralized by the pyridinium ion in another Lewis acid-base reaction to form pyridine hydrochloride. Pyridine hydrochloride is soluble in water, while the newly synthesized cholesteryl nonanoate is not. Addition of the reaction mixture to aqueous sulfuric acid causes only the desired product, cholesteryl nonanoate. [Pg.462]

The Lewis bonding model with its electron pairs can be used to define a more general kind of acid-base behavior of which the Arrhenius and Bronsted-Lowry definitions are special cases. A Lewis base is any species that donates lone-pair electrons, and a Lewis acid is any species that accepts such electron pairs. The Arrhenius acids and bases considered so far fit this description (with the Lewis acid, H, acting as an acceptor toward various Lewis bases such as NH3 and OH , the electron pair donors). Other reactions that do not involve hydrogen ions can still be considered Lewis acid-base reactions. An example is the reaction between electron-deficient BF3 and electron-rich NH3 ... [Pg.627]

The Usanovich definition of acids and bases has not been widely used, probably because of (I) the relative inaccessibility of the original to non-Russian-reading chemists and (2) the awkwardness and circularity of Usanovich s original definition. The Usanovich definition includes all reactions of Lewis acids and bases and extends the latter concept by removing the restriction that the donation or acceptance of electrons be as shared pairs. The complete definition is as follows An add is any chemical species which reacts with bases, gives up cations, or accepts anions or electrons, and, conversely, a base is any chemical species which reacts with acids, gives up anions or electrons, or combines with cations. Although perhaps unnecessarily complicated, this definition simply includes all Lewis acid-base reactions plus redox reactions, which may consist of complete transfer of one or more electrons. Usanovich also stressed unsaturation involved in certain acid-base reactions ... [Pg.697]

The American chemist G. N. Lewis formulated such a definition. He defined what we now call a Lewis base as a substance that can donate a pair of electrons. A. Lewis acid is a substance that can accept a pair of electrons. For example, in the protonation of ammonia, NH3 acts as a Lewis base because it donates a pair of electrons to the proton H, which acts as a Lewis acid by accepting the pair of electrons. A Lewis acid-base reaction, therefore, is one that involves the donation of a pair of electrons from one species to another. Such a reaction does not produce a salt and water. [Pg.631]

The significance of the Lewis concept is that it is much more general than other definitions. Lewis acid-base reactions include many reactions that do not involve Brpnsted acids. Consider, for example, the reaction between boron trifluoride (BF3) and ammonia to form an adduct compound (Figure 15.11) ... [Pg.631]

In Section 10.4 we saw that the B atom in BF3 is xp -hybridized. The vacant, unhybridized 2p orbital accepts the pair of electrons from NH3. So BF3 functions as an acid according to the Lewis definition, even though it does not contain an ionizable proton. Note that a coordinate covalent bond is formed between the B and N atoms, as is the case in all Lewis acid-base reactions. [Pg.631]

In 1923, Gilbert Newton Lewis defined an acid as an electron pair acceptor and a base as an electron pair donor. This definition is even more inclusive than the previous one because it includes all Bronsted-Lowry acids and bases as a subset and provides the foundation for the field of coordination chemistry. A coordination compound is the product of a Lewis acid-base reaction, such as the one shown in Equation (14.11) and Figure 14.5, in which the metal ion (Lewis acid) and ligand (Lewis base) are held together by a coordinate covalent bond. [Pg.459]

You have reviewed the Bronsted-Lowry definition of acids and bases and the meanings of pH and pTQ. You have learned to identify the most acidic hydrogen atoms in a molecule based on a comparison of pIQ values. You will see in many cases that Brensted—Lowry acid-base reactions either initiate or complete an organic reaction, or prepare an organic molecule for further reaction. The Lewis definition of acids and bases may have been new to you. However, you will see over and over again that Lewis acid—base reactions which involve either the donation of an electron pair to form a new covalent bond or the departure of an electron pair to break a covalent bond are central steps in many organic reactions. The vast majority of organic reactions you will study are either Bronsted-Lowry or Lewis acid—base reactions. [Pg.137]

While the Bronsted acid/base terms specifically refer to proton donors and acceptors, respectively, the Lewis approach (named after G. N. Lewis, who introduced the idea in 1923) greatly broadens the definitions of what is an acid and what is a base. Recall that a Lewis acid is an electron pair acceptor and a Lewis base is an electron pair donor. All common organic reactions that do not involve radicals or concerted pericyclic processes can in some manner be discussed as Lewis acid-base reactions. Similarly, all these reactions can be considered to be occurring between electrophiles and nucleophiles. Recall that an electrophile is any species seeking electrons and a nucleophile is any species seeking a nucleus (or positive charge) toward which it can donate its electrons. In this context, a Lewis base is synonymous with a nucleophile, and a Lewis acid is synonymous with an electrophile it just de-... [Pg.288]

There are at least three different definitions and vantage points that chemists use to expand upon the electrostatic paradigm. They are nucleophile-electrophile combinations, Lewis acid-base reactions, and donor-acceptor orbital interactions. We have used these terms repeatedly throughout this book because they are presented in introductory organic chemistry classes, but here we give them strict definitions. Each of these definitions is a subtle variation on the other, and often it is essentially a case of semantics to decide which best describes a particular reaction. [Pg.539]

Lewis acid-base behaviour is a simple extension of this idea, with one species providing both electrons and the other species providing a pair of holes (the absence of two electrons in a cloud), so when complex formation occurs, both the former electrons plug the double hole and form a bond. Lewis acid-base reactions are indeed acid-base reactions (with our new definition of acids and bases). [Pg.177]

The Lewis definitions of acids and bases provide for a more general view of acid-base reactions than either the Arrhenius or Br0nsted-Lowry pic ture A Lewis acid is an electron pair acceptor A Lewis base is an electron pair donor The Lewis approach incorporates the Br0nsted-Lowry approach as a subcategory m which the atom that accepts the electron pair m the Lewis acid is a proton... [Pg.50]

The fact that a Lewis acid is able to accept an electron pair means that it must have either a vacant, low-energy orbital or a polar bond to hydrogen so that it can donate H+ (which has an empty7 Is orbital). Thus, the Lewis definition of acidity includes many species in addition to H+. For example, various metal cations, such as Mg2+, are Lewis acids because they accept a pair of electrons when they form a bond to a base. We ll also see in later chapters that certain metabolic reactions begin with an acid-base reaction between Mg2+ as a Lewis acid and an organic diphosphate or triphosphate ion as the Lewis base. [Pg.57]

Thus an acid-base reaction involves the transfer of an oxide ion (compared with the transfer of a proton in the Bronsted theory) and the theory is particularly applicable in considering acid-base relationships in oxide, silicate and aluminosilicate glasses. However, we shall find that it is subsumed within the Lewis definition. [Pg.17]

It is better than the Lewis theory for describing acid-base cements, for it avoids the awkwardness that the Lewis definition has with protonic acids. However, as Day Selbin (1969) have observed, the generality of the theory is such that it includes nearly all chemical reactions, so that acid-base reactions could simply be termed chemical reactions . [Pg.19]

Comparison of Bronsted reaction 4.48 with Lewis reaction 4.49 shows that the Lewis theory is more generally applicable, but its interpretation is different in terms of the definition of acids and complexes. In fact, the Lewis theory is valid for all acid-base reactions (cf., eqns. 4.39 and 4.40). [Pg.266]

The hydrogen ion accepts the lone pair of electrons from the ammonia to form the ammonium ion. The hydrogen ion, because it accepts a pair of electrons, is the Lewis acid. The ammonia, because it donates a pair of electrons, is the Lewis base. This reaction is also a Brpnsted-Lowry acid-base reaction. This illustrates that a substance may be an acid or a base by more than one definition. All Brpnsted-Lowry acids are Lewis acids, and all Brpnsted-Lowry bases are Lewis bases. However, the reverse is not necessarily true. [Pg.227]

In 1923 the American chemist G.N. Lewis provided a broad definition of acids and bases, which covered acid-base reactions not involving the traditional proton transfer an acid is an electron-pair acceptor (Lewis acid) and a base is an electron-pair donor (Lewis base). The concept was extended to metal-ligand interactions with the ligand acting as donor, or Lewis base, and the metal ion as acceptor, or Lewis acid. [Pg.15]

Thus, Lewis s definition is a much broader definition that includes coordination compound formation as acid-base reactions, besides Arrhenius and Lowry-Bronsted acids and bases. Examples ... [Pg.97]

In the same year that Bronsted and Lowry proposed their definition of acids and bases, an American chemist named Gilbert Lewis proposed an alternative definition that not only encompassed Bronsted-Lowry theory but also accounted for acid-base reactions in which a hydrogen ion isn t exchanged. Lewis s definition relies on tracking lone pairs of electrons. Under his theory, a base is any substance that donates a pair of electrons to form a coordinate covalent bond with another substance, while an acid is a substance that accepts that electron pair in such a reaction. As we explain in Chapter 5, a coordinate covalent bond is a covalent bond in which both of the bonding electrons are donated by one of the atoms forming the bond. [Pg.225]

All Br0nsted-Lowry acids are Lewis acids, but in practice, the term Lewis acid is generally reserved for Lewis acids that don t also fit the Bronsted-Lowry definition. The best way to spot a Lewis acid-base pair is to draw a Lewis dot structure of the reacting substances, noting the presence of lone pairs of electrons. (We introduce Lewis structures in Chapter 5.) For example, consider the reaction between ammonia (NH3) and boron trifluoride (BFj) ... [Pg.226]


See other pages where Lewis acid-base reactions, definition is mentioned: [Pg.708]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.708]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.204]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.169 ]




SEARCH



Acid base reactions

Acid-base definitions

Acidity Lewis definition

Acidity definitions

Acids definition

Base, definition

Bases Lewis definition

Bases, acid-base reactions

Lewis Acid-Base

Lewis acid, definition

Lewis acid-base definition

Lewis acid-base reactions

Lewis base reactions

Lewis definition

Lewis reactions

Reaction definition

© 2024 chempedia.info