Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Level schemes ruthenium

Figure 3.32. Energy level scheme of the device in Figure 3.31. Photoinduced electron transfer takes place from the photoexcited ruthenium dye into the Ti02 conduction band. The recombination directly back to the dye has to be suppressed. Instead, the current is directed through the circuit to the counterelectrode and the hole conductor that brings the electrons back via hopping transport. HTM hole transport material. Figure 3.32. Energy level scheme of the device in Figure 3.31. Photoinduced electron transfer takes place from the photoexcited ruthenium dye into the Ti02 conduction band. The recombination directly back to the dye has to be suppressed. Instead, the current is directed through the circuit to the counterelectrode and the hole conductor that brings the electrons back via hopping transport. HTM hole transport material.
The level schemes for [Ru(phen)3] and [Os(phen)3] (phen == 1,10-phenanthroline) are representative of the clusters of low lying electronic states that arise from dv configurations of many ruthenium (II), osmium (II), and iridium (III) complexes. They are highly unusual since they have decay parameters that lie between the ranges expected for conventional singlet and triplet states and because of the magnitudes of the splittings themselves. These parameters control the nature of dir" ... [Pg.152]

More recently, using the cyclometallated iridium C,(7-benzoate derived from allyl acetate, 4-methoxy-3-nitrobenzoic acid and BIPHEP, catalytic carbonyl crotylation employing 1,3-butadiene from the aldehyde, or alcohol oxidation was achieved under transfer hydrogenation conditions [274]. Carbonyl addition occurs with roughly equal facility from the alcohol or aldehyde oxidation level. However, products are obtained as diastereomeric mixtures. Stereoselective variants of these processes are under development. It should be noted that under the conditions of ruthenium-catalyzed transfer hydrogenation, conjugated dienes, including butadiene, couple to alcohols or aldehydes to provide either products of carbonyl crotylation or p,y-enones (Scheme 16) [275, 276]. [Pg.122]

Ruthenium(II) complexes may also be used to oxidize N-Boc hydroxylamine in the presence of tert-butylhydroperoxide (TBHP) to the corresponding nitroso dieno-phile, which is subsequently trapped by cyclohexa-1,3-diene to give the hetero Diels-Alder adduct (Entry 1, Scheme 10.26) [51]. A triphenylphosphine oxide-stabilized ruthenium(IV) oxo-complex was found to be the catalytically active species. Use of a chiral bidentate bis-phosphine-derived ruthenium ligand (BINAP or PROPHOS) result in very low asymmetric induction (8 and 11%) (Entry 2, Scheme 10.26). The low level of asymmetric induction is explained by the reaction conditions (in-situ oxidation) that failed to produce discrete, stable diastereomerically pure mthenium complexes. It is shown that ruthenium(II) salen complexes also catalyze the oxidation of N-Boc-hydroxylamine in the presence of TBHP, to give the N-Boc-nitroso compound which can be efficiently trapped with a range of dienes from cyclohepta-1,3-diene (1 h, r.t., CH2CI2, 71%) to 9,10-dimethylanthracene (96 h, r.t., CH2CI2,... [Pg.273]

Recyclable imidazolium-tagged ruthenium catalysts 89 and 90 have been developed to perform olefin RCM and CM in ILs [bmimJpF ] and [bmim][Tf2N]. A high level of recyclability combined with a high reactivity were obtained in the RCM of various di- or tri-substituted and/or oxygen-containing dienes (Scheme 1.53). Extremely low residual ruthenium levels were detected in the RCM products (average of 7.3 ppm per run). ... [Pg.57]

Hamada et al. have reported the enantioselective, photocatalytic oxidation of (R)-and (S)-l,l -bi-2-naphthol (2 and 3) with [Ru(menbpy)3] 12 a chiral ruthenium complex [93]. A-12 was photoexcited using filtered visible light (X > 400 nm), and the excited complex oxidized by [Co(acac)3], before returning to its ground state oxidation level through reaction with the diol. The (5)-diol was found to be the most reactive of the two enantiomers, and after 13.8% conversion, 2 was present in 15.2% ee (Scheme 10). However, this value was observed to decrease steadily as the percentage conversion increased. [Pg.96]

While copper and iron Lewis acids are the most prominent late transition metal Diels-Alder catalysts, there are reports on the use of other chiral complexes derived from ruthenium [97,98],rhodium [99],andzinc [100] in enantioselective cycloaddition reactions, with variable levels of success. As a comparison study, the reactions of a zinc(II)-bis(oxazoline) catalyst 41 and zinc(II)-pyridylbis(ox-azoline) catalyst 42 were evaluated side-by-side with their copper(II) counterparts (Scheme 34) [101]. The study concluded that zinc(II) Lewis acids catalyzed a few cycloadditions selectively, but, in contrast to the [Cu(f-Bubox)](SbFg)2 complex 31b (Sect. 3.2.1), enantioselectivity was not maintained over a range of temperatures or substitution patterns on the dienophile. An X-ray crystal structure of [Zn(Ph-box)] (01)2 revealed a tetrahedral metal center the absolute stereochemistry of the adduct was consistent with the reaction from that geometry and opposite that obtained with Cu(II) complex 31. [Pg.1143]

There remain over the low-level radioactive wastes, largely ruthenium, mercury, and chromium. These metals are in the form of soluble nitrates The problem is that any disposal scheme that allows the material to reach the ground water may result in contamination. Were those nitrates to be reduced eventually to ammonia and even molecular nitrogen, this would remove the hazard (Hobbs and White, 1992). If the economics justified it, some of the metals would be recovered. The rest would be stored as oxides. [Pg.37]

Nevertheless there remains several possible routes to the formation of ethyl esters from CO/H2 (see Scheme A). The direct production of ethanol (path c) can be discounted in our systems since both methanol and ethanol are generated in significant concentrations at high propionic acid conversions (see Table VI, expt. 2 and 8). Path (d) appears less likely in view of the relatively slow rates of I-free, ruthenium-catalyzed, methanol homologation (55), relative to esterification. Path (a), also eq. 24, and (b), however, could represent parallel reaction paths where at high acid levels (and therefore low acid conversions) the ester route (a) might be expected to predominate (we see little or no evidence for methanol under those conditions). Preliminary results with stronger aliphatic acid coreactants, such as trifluoroacetic acid, are also in accord with these conclusions. [Pg.31]


See other pages where Level schemes ruthenium is mentioned: [Pg.155]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.669]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.715]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.888]    [Pg.49]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.102 , Pg.312 ]




SEARCH



Level scheme

© 2024 chempedia.info