Leaf glass fiber

Glass fiber leaf separators in the USA -especially at one large manufacturer-were for over a decade, between 1980 and 1995, an intermediate in the transition from conventional leaf separator to microporous pocket. The web is produced... 

Microfiber glass fleece mats are typically produced from a blend of 20 - 30 percent glass microfibers <1 //m in diameter, with the balance of the glass fibers thicker (3 - 10 //m) and longer (cf. Fig. 1), on a specialized paper machine (Fou-drinier), since this is the only way of achieving the desired tensile strength without binder. The material is supplied in roll form, even though it is normally not processed into pockets, which are not required due to the absence of free electrolyte. The classification here as a leaf separator should be seen in this sense. 

Table 7.15 Glass fiber-epoxy RP leaf spring design...

Epoxy Adhesive, automotive leaf springs (with glass fiber), bicycle frames (with carbon fiber), etc. 

Reinforcement of thermoplastic and thermosetting composites with cellulose fibers is increasingly regarded as an alternative to glass fiber reinforcement. The enviromnental issues in combination with their low cost have recently generated considerable interest in cellulose fibers such as isora, jute, flax, hemp, kenaf, pineapple leaf, and man-made cellulose fibers as fillers for polymer matrices-based composites. 

Polyethylene pocket separators Sintered PVC separators Cellulosic separators Cellulosic/ glass mix separators Glass fiber leaf separators... 

In order to eliminate the hemiceUulose component and, consequently, to increase the water absorption resistance, alkah treatment of natural fibers has often been conducted in diverse biocomposite systems, for example, sisal/phenolic [120] and natural fiber/glass fiber hybrid UPE [76]. Mishra et al. [76] reported that the water absorption of pineapple leaf fiber/glass hybrid and sisal/glass hybrid composites was 7% less than that of the unhybridized composites and the absorption was further reduced by 6% by fiber surface treatments before composite processing, compared with the untreated fiber/glass hybrid composites. 

---