Layered polymers, glass transition

Phase III was divided into three parts by Alexander and Napper namely into a period of smooth monomer supply of the active centres from aqueous phase and from monomer-rich particle layers, a period of viscosity increase in the particles (by affecting monomer diffusion, viscosity begins to control the reaction rate) and the period of approach to the polymer glass transition [126,145,146]. 

The residual monomer content will by external plasticization cause a considerable lowering of the polymer glass transition temperature. A correlation between stability and softness of the polymer particles may exist. The hydrophobic part of the emulsifier molecules may partly penetrate the particle surface and thus be anchored to the surface to some extent. The resistance to deformation of such a stabilizing layer, when subjected to mechanical shear, is assumed to be dependent on the polymer particle softness. With soft particles polymer chain entanglement may also occur on particle-to-particle contact, making redispersion of agglomerates more unlikely. 

Some orientation was retained on thermal polymerization of p-benz-amidostyrene when polymerization was carried out below the polymer glass transition temp>erature 66). Again the monomer crystal has a layer structure separating reactive radicals. The reaction proceeded in successive layers of the monomer crystal form the outside to the inside without induction period. However, the retained orientation detected by optical microscopy and infrared dichroism disappeared above the glass transition temperature of the polymer. Again no path to a polymer crystal structure seems to be available in this reaction. The polymer produced is slightly less dense than the monomer crystal since it is amorphous (6K5). Similar orientation in the amorphous state was found on polymerization of terephthalonitril oxide aystals 67). 

It was earlier shown that a layer of epoxy polymer on a metal siuface does not change the polymer condition [422, 423]. Treatment of the basalt surface with surfactant affects the glass-transition temperature of the polymer. As seen from Fig. 9.1, for a low-energy siuface (basalt, treated with surfactant) the polymer glass-transition temperature does not depend on variation of the thickness of the pol5rmer layer. 

A poly(arylene ether sulfone) (22) containing TPD moieties was synthesized by the reaction of the corresponding bisphenol with 4,4 -difluorodiphenylsulfone [99]. The weight average molecular weight of the polymer (22) was determined to be 9300. Its thermal properties are excellent for the appKcation in electroluminescent devices as hole transport layer. The glass transition temperature of the polymer (22) is 190 °C. 

We present here a simple experiment, conceived to test both the reptation model and the minor chain model, by Welp et al. [50] and Agrawal et al. [51-53]. Consider the HDH/DHD interface formed with two layers of polystyrene with chain architectures shown in Fig. 5. In one of the layers, the central 50% of the chain is deuterated. This constitutes a triblock copolymer of labeled and normal polystyrene, which is, denoted HDH. In the second layer, the labeling has been reversed so that the two end fractions of the chain are deuterated, denoted by DHD. At temperatures above the glass transition temperature of the polystyrene ( 100°C), the polymer chains begin to interdiffuse across the... 

This variation in the properties of polymers along their interfaces with inclusions is extended to layers of a sometimes significant thickness. This follows from the fact that, if only a thin surface-layer of the polymer was affected by its contact with the other phase, then the change in Tg should be insignificant, since the level of the glass transition temperature is associated with the bulk of the polymer, or, at least, with a large portion of it. 

Moreover, in many cases, a shift of Tg to lower values of temperature has been detected, but in these cases the quality of adhesion between phases may be the main reason for the reversing of this attitude 11,14). If calorimetric measurements are executed in the neighbourhood of the glass transition zone, it is easy to show that jumps of energies appear in this neighbourhood. These jumps are very sensitive to the amount of filler added to the matrix polymer and they were used for the evaluation of the boundary layers developed around fillers. 

The dynamic mechanical thermal analyzer (DMTA) is an important tool for studying the structure-property relationships in polymer nanocomposites. DMTA essentially probes the relaxations in polymers, thereby providing a method to understand the mechanical behavior and the molecular structure of these materials under various conditions of stress and temperature. The dynamics of polymer chain relaxation or molecular mobility of polymer main chains and side chains is one of the factors that determine the viscoelastic properties of polymeric macromolecules. The temperature dependence of molecular mobility is characterized by different transitions in which a certain mode of chain motion occurs. A reduction of the tan 8 peak height, a shift of the peak position to higher temperatures, an extra hump or peak in the tan 8 curve above the glass transition temperature (Tg), and a relatively high value of the storage modulus often are reported in support of the dispersion process of the layered silicate. 

---