Lateral manipulation modes

Fig. 3. A sphere model (a) illustrates the tip paths encountered during the lateral manipulation on a fcc(lll) metal surface, (b) Single atom manipulation signals taken on a Ag(lll) surface show a sudden transition from various pulling modes to a sliding mode at = 30° [5],...

The manipulation mode refers to operations of relocating or removing atoms on a surface. Figure 5.3 illustrates relocating an adatom (an atom attached to the surface) by vertical and lateral manipulation. In vertical manipulation, an adatom is transferred from the surface to the probe tip, and then is deposited at another location. The attachment and detachment of the atom to and from the tip is controlled by voltage pulses. In lateral manipulation, an adatom remains adsorbed on the surface and is moved laterally by the tip when there is a weak bond between the adatom and the tip. This technique has been used for serious as well as fanciful work. For example, a scientist at the IBM Corporation made an IBM symbol with a few atoms using the manipulation mode in an STM. 

Figure 5.3 Manipulation mode in the STM (a) vertical manipulation, where an adatom forms a strong bond with the tip and is detached from the surface, then it is transported by the tip and redeposited on the surface and (b) lateral manipulation where the tip forms a weak bond with an adatom and moves it along the line of manipulation. (Reproduced with kind permission of Springer Science and Business Media from E. Meyer, J.H. Hug, and R. Bennewitz, Scanning Probe Microscopy the Lab on a Tip, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 2004 Springer-Verlag GmbH.)...

For better comparison of theoretical predictions for different-order processes, we have plotted the quantum Fano factors for both interacting modes in the no-energy-transfer regime with N = 2 — 5 and r = 5 in Fig. 7. One can see that all curves start from F w(0) = 1 for the input coherent fields and become quasistationary after some relaxations. The quantum and semiclassical Fano factors coincide for high-intensity fields and longer times, specifically for t > 50/(Og), where il will be defined later by Eq. (54). In Fig. 17, we observe that all fundamental modes remain super-Poissonian [F (t) >1], whereas the iVth harmonics become sub-Poissonian (F (t) < 1). The most suppressed noise is observed for the third harmonic with the Fano factor 0.81. In Fig. 7, we have included the predictions of the classical trajectory method (plotted by dotted lines) to show that they properly fit the exact quantum results (full curves) for the evolution times t > 50/(Og). The small residual differences result from the fact that the amplitude r was chosen to be relatively small (r = 5). This value does not precisely fulfill the condition r> 1. We have taken r = 5 as a compromise between the asymptotic value r oo and computational complexity to manipulate the matrices of dimensions 1000 x 1000. Unfortunately, we cannot increase amplitude r arbitrary due to computational limitations. 

To apply control to a process, one measures the controlled variable and compares it to the setpoint and, based on this comparison, typically uses the actuator to make adjustments to the flow rate of the manipulated variable. The industrial practice of process control is highly dependent upon the performance of the actuator system (final control element) and the sensor system as well as the controller. If either the final control element or the sensor is not performing satisfactorily, it can drastically affect control performance regardless of controller action. Each of these systems (i.e., the actuator, sensor, and controller) is made up of several separate components therefore, the improper design or application of these components, or an electrical or mechanical failure of one of them, can seriously affect the resulting performance of the entire control loop. The present description of these devices focuses on their control-relevant aspects. Later, troubleshooting approaches and control loop component failure modes are discussed. 

From a materials engineering perspective, what is needed in order to completely characterize these capsular structures, is a tool with which to probe their mechanical properties - an ability to manipulate individual giant lipid vesicles capsules and cells, that can not only apply well defined stresses for each of the three basic modes of deformation, (dilational, shear, and bending), but that can also measure the strain resulting from the applied stress, and therefore characterize the material behavior in terms of elastic moduli and viscous coefficients. The micropipet technique, initiated by Rand and Burton [92] and later perfected by Evans and Hochmuth [16], provides such an ability. It has been used extensively since the late 1970s to measure and characterize the material properties of red cells, white cells, and giant vesicles as reviewed in several recent publications [30,69,82]. 

---