Laminar flow scale

The pressure drop across a packed bed in laminar flow scales like the pressure drop across an open tube in laminar flow. In the turbulent limit, the Ergun equation predicts... 

Figure 5-18. Laminar flow mixing. For known impeller type, diameter, speed, and viscosity, this nomograph will give power consumption. Connect RPM and diameter, also viscosity and impeller scale. The intersection of these two separate lines with alpha and beta respectively is then connected to give horsepower on the HP scale. By permission, Quillen, C. S., Chem. Engr., June 1954, p. 177 [15].

The calculation of heat transfer film coefficients in an air-lift bioreactor is more complex, as small reactors may operate under laminar flow conditions whereas large-scale vessels operate under turbulent flow conditions. It has been found that under laminar flow conditions, the fermentation broths show non-Newtonian behaviour, so the heat transfer coefficient can be evaluated with a modified form of the equation known as the Graetz-Leveque equation 9... 

In our analysis, we discuss experimental results of heat transfer obtained by previous investigators and related to incompressible fluid flow in micro-channels of different geometry. The basic characteristics of experimental conditions are given in Table 4.1. The studies considered herein were selected to reveal the physical basis of scale effect on convective heat transfer and are confined mainly to consideration of laminar flows that are important for comparison with conventional theory. 

Solution The approach is similar to that in Example 3.7. The unknowns are Sl and (Em)2. Set (Poudi = (Pout) - Equation (3.40) is used to calculate iPm)2 nd Equation (3.41) is used to calculate Sl- Results are given in Table 3.2. The results are qualitatively similar to those for the turbulent flow of a gas, but the scaled reactors are longer and the pressure drops are lower. In both cases, the reader should recall that the ideal gas law was assumed. This may become unrealistic for higher pressures. In Table 3.2 we make the additional assumption of laminar flow in both the large and small reactors. This assumption will be violated if the scaleup factor is large. 

This equation has the same functional dependence on p (namely none) and m as the Poiseuille equation that governs laminar flow in an empty tube. Thus, laminar flow packed beds scale in series exactly like laminar flow in empty tubes. See the previous sections on series scaleup of liquids and gases in laminar flow. 

The case of a compressible fluid is more complicated since it is the inventory and not the volume that scales with A. The case of laminar flow is the simplest and is one where scaling with geometric similarity can make sense. 

The same result is obtained when the fluid is compressible, as may be seen by substituting Sr = Si = S into Equations (3.40) and (3.41). Thus, using geometric similarity to scale isothermal, laminar flows gives constant pressure drop provided the flow remains laminar upon scaleup. The large and small reactors will have the same inlet pressure if they are operated at the same outlet pressure. The inventory and volume both scale as S. 

Constant-Pressure Scaleups for Laminar Flows in Tubes. As shown in the previous section, scaling with geometric similarity, Sr = Sr = 5 /, gives... 

As a general rule, scaled-down reactors will more closely approach isothermal operation but will less closely approach ideal piston flow when the large reactor is turbulent. Large scaledowns will lead to laminar flow. If the large system is laminar, the scaled-down version will be laminar as well and will more closely approach piston flow due to greater radial diffusion. 

Chapter 3 introduced the basic concepts of scaleup for tubular reactors. The theory developed in this chapter allows scaleup of laminar flow reactors on a more substantive basis. Model-based scaleup supposes that the reactor is reasonably well understood at the pilot scale and that a model of the proposed plant-scale reactor predicts performance that is acceptable, although possibly worse than that achieved in the pilot reactor. So be it. If you trust the model, go for it. The alternative is blind scaleup, where the pilot reactor produces good product and where the scaleup is based on general principles and high hopes. There are situations where blind scaleup is the best choice based on business considerations but given your druthers, go for model-based scaleup. 

The temperature counterpart of Q>aVR ccj-F/R and if ccj-F/R is low enough, then the reactor will be adiabatic. Since aj 3>a, the situation of an adiabatic, laminar flow reactor is rare. Should it occur, then T i, will be the same in the small and large reactors, and blind scaleup is possible. More commonly, ari/R wiU be so large that radial diffusion of heat will be significant in the small reactor. The extent of radial diffusion will lessen upon scaleup, leading to the possibility of thermal runaway. If model-based scaleup predicts a reasonable outcome, go for it. Otherwise, consider scaling in series or parallel. 

Polymerizations often give such high viscosities that laminar flow is inevitable. A t5rpical monomer diffusivity in a polymerizing mixture is 1.0 X 10 ° m/s (the diffusivity of the polymer will be much lower). A pilot-scale reactor might have a radius of 1 cm. What is the maximum value for the mean residence time before molecular diffusion becomes important What about a production-scale reactor with R= 10 cm ... 

For most medium- and large-scale micromanifold structures, where one passage feeds multiple parallel channels, flow traverses through turbulent and transition flows in the micromanifold region. This fluid in turbulent to transition flow also turns in the micromanifold region as it drops flow into parallel microchannels, which are primarily in the laminar flow regime. 

Cherry and Papoutsakis [33] refer to the exposure to the collision between microcarriers and influence of turbulent eddies. Three different flow regions were defined bulk turbulent flow, bulk laminar flow and boundary-layer flow. They postulate the primary mechanism coming from direct interactions between microcarriers and turbulent eddies. Microcarriers are small beads of several hundred micrometers diameter. Eddies of the size of the microcarrier or smaller may cause high shear stresses on the cells. The size of the smallest eddies can be estimated by the Kolmogorov length scale L, as given by... 

Confined flows typically exhibit laminar-flow regimes, i.e. rely on a diffusion mixing mechanism, and consequently are only slowly mixed when the diffusion distance is set too large. For this reason, in view of the potential of microfabrication, many authors pointed to the enhancement of mass transfer that can be achieved on further decreasing the diffusional length scales. By simple correlations based on Fick s law, it is evident that short liquid mixing times in the order of milliseconds should result on decreasing the diffusion distance to a few micrometers. 

The complete expression for the effective diffusion, under laminar flow conditions, has been derived by Van den Broeck [24] for both short (t < a2/ D) time scales... 

A flow pattern in which the various fluid elements follow different paths without mutual mixing on a microscopic scale. An example of this case is laminar flow. 

This expression applies to the transport of any conserved quantity Q, e.g., mass, energy, momentum, or charge. The rate of transport of Q per unit area normal to the direction of transport is called the flux of Q. This transport equation can be applied on a microscopic or molecular scale to a stationary medium or a fluid in laminar flow, in which the mechanism for the transport of Q is the intermolecular forces of attraction between molecules or groups of molecules. It also applies to fluids in turbulent flow, on a turbulent convective scale, in which the mechanism for transport is the result of the motion of turbulent eddies in the fluid that move in three directions and carry Q with them. 

---