Lagrangian equation limits

The variational formalism makes it possible to postulate a relativistic Lagrangian that is Lorentz invariant and reduces to Newtonian mechanics in the classical limit. Introducing a parameter m, the proper mass of a particle, or mass as measured in its own instantaneous rest frame, the Lagrangian for a free particle can be postulated to have the invariant form A = mulxiilx = — mc2. The canonical momentum is pf, = iiiuj, and the Lagrangian equation of motion is... 

So far, the Lagrangian density for a homogenous problem (no sink or source term in the diffusion equation) has been considered, subject to the requirement that the approximate trial function, ip, can be forced to satisfy the boundary conditions. In this sub-section, these limitations are removed and the Lagrangian density for the Green s function developed. The Green s functions for the forward and backward time process satisfy the equations... 

Sample Computation Results. The Lagrangian scheme of Equation (9) to (15) was used to compute the steady state response to sinusoidal excitation of an anechoic coating glued on a steel plate shown in Figure 1. Symmetry considerations permit the calculations to be limited to the regions between the dotted lines, the unit cell. 

In order to prove equation (6), it is more convenient to work from equation (3) than from the limiting relation given in equation (5) and also to introduce the Lagrangian representation [10]. For any continuum X, let the three parameters af identify the individual point particles of continuum K for... 

For mathematical convenience, boundary conditions and initial conditions must be prescribed. For the simple marine propeller problem, a Lagrangian viewpoint was adopted. The frame of reference was attached to the propeller so that the propeller was fixed but the vessel was rotating. The boundary condition was then a zero velocity on the impeller, while the vessel wall rotated at -Qimpdier- The free surface was considered to be fiat, therefore the normal velocity was zero and a shear-free condition was assumed. It should be noted that in the Lagrangian viewpoint, the frame of reference is in rotation. The fluid is therefore subjected to a constant acceleration and the momentum conservation equation [Eq. (6)] must be modified to account for centrifugal forces and Coriolis forces.An advantage is, however, that the flow can be solved numerically at steady state provided the flow is fully periodic, which limits the computational efforts significantly. 

The Shliomis Stepanov approach [9] to the ferrofluid relaxation problem, which is based on the Fokker Planck equation, has come to be known in the literature on magnetism as the egg model. Yet another treatment has recently been given by Scherer and Matuttis [42] using a generalized Lagrangian formalism however, in the discussion of the applications of their method, they limited themselves to a frozen Neel and a frozen Brownian mechanism, respectively. 

With this state vector the system Lagrangian is formed in the limit of narrow Gaussian wave packets, i.e., for w O. The Euler-Lagrange equations... 

We note that the above results are not limited to the case of linear decay, but also apply to any kind of decay-type or stable reaction dynamics in a flow with chaotic advection (Chertkov, 1999 Hernandez-Garcfa et ah, 2002). In such systems where the reaction dynamics is nonlinear, the decay rate b should be replaced by the absolute value of the negative Lyapunov exponent of the Lagrangian chemical dynamics given by the second equation in (6.25), that represents the average decay rate of small perturbations in the chemical concentration along the trajectory of a fluid element. 

The use of functionals and their derivatives is not limited to density-functional theory, or even to quantum mechanics. In classical mechanics, e.g., one expresses the Lagrangian C in terms of of generalized coordinates q(x,t) and their temporal derivatives q(x,t), and obtains the equations of motion from extremizing the action functional 4[g] = J C q, q t)dt. The resulting equations of motion are the well-known Euler-Lagrange equations 0 = = fy — > which are a special case of Eq. (14). 

The above considerations leads to the somewhat troubling question of whether (128) represents the true non-relativistic limit of the Dirac equation in the presence of external fields. Referring back to (110) we have certainly obtained the non-relativistic limit of the free-particle part Lm, but we have in fact retained the interaction term as well as the Lagrangian of the free field. In order to obtain the proper non-relativistic limit, we must consider what is the non-relativistic limit of classical electrodynamics. This task is not facilitated by the fact that, contrary to purely mechanical systems, the laws of electrodynamics appear in different unit systems in which the speed of light appears differently. In the Gaussian system Maxwell s laws are given as... 

The expression containing the T functions or factorials is valid only in the so-called weak-coupling limit where the coupling constant gj = mjtOjARj/ 2h, describing the changes in the equilibrium position ARj, is smaller than unity. For displaced (AR 0) oscillators, the Lagrangian parameter t, which controls the optimum distribution, must be determined from the equation [14]... 

Having demonstrated that exact solution for the mean concentrations (c, (x, t j) even of inert species in a turbulent fluid is not possible in general by either the Eulerian or Lagrangian approaches, we now consider what assumptions and approximations can be invoked to obtain practical descriptions of atmospheric diffusion. In Section 18.4 we shall proceed from the two basic equations for (c,), (18.4) and (18.8), to obtain the equations commonly used for atmospheric diffusion. A particularly important aspect is the delineation of the assumptions and limitations inherent in each description. 

---